Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Second harmonic generation in reverse proton exchanged Lithium Niobate waveguides

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We investigate efficient second harmonic generation in reverse proton exchanged Lithium Niobate waveguides. In z-cut crystals, the resulting buried and surface guides support TM and TE polarizations, respectively, and are coupled through the d31 nonlinear element. Numerically estimated conversion efficiencies in planar structures operating at 1.32µm reach 90% in 2cm or a normalized 14% µm/Wcm.

©2001 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Highly efficient second-harmonic generation in buried waveguides formed by annealed and reverse proton exchange in periodically poled lithium niobate

Krishnan R. Parameswaran, Roger K. Route, Jonathan R. Kurz, Rostislav V. Roussev, Martin M. Fejer, and Masatoshi Fujimura
Opt. Lett. 27(3) 179-181 (2002)

Anisotropic model for the fabrication of annealed and reverse proton exchanged waveguides in congruent lithium niobate

Francesco Lenzini, Sachin Kasture, Ben Haylock, and Mirko Lobino
Opt. Express 23(2) 1748-1756 (2015)

Second harmonic generation from radiation to guided modes for the characterization of reverse-proton-exchanged waveguides

M. Marangoni, R. Osellame, R. Ramponi, and E. Giorgetti
Opt. Express 12(2) 294-298 (2004)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. RPE geometry with graphs of ordinary and extraordinary index distributions in z-cut LN.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Computed SHG conversion efficiency versus input power for a 1cm sample at 25°C. (a) CMT and (b) EFDBPM results in case of Gaussian excitation.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Contour maps of (a) FF and (b) SH intensity versus z and y for a Gaussian input at 10W/µm in a sample at temperature 25°C.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Phase-matching diagram at 25°C versus modal order m at SH. The horizontal lines refer to the FF modes, TE0 and leaky (or quasi-mode), respectively. The inset shows the corresponding TMm-TE0 overlap integral.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Contour maps of (a) FF and (b) SH intensity versus z and y for a TE0 input at 10W/µm.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Conversion efficiency versus input FF power (TE0 excitation) at (a) 25 and (b) 85°C, for samples 1cm (dashed line) and 2cm (solid line) in length.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Conversion efficiency versus temperature (TE0 excitation) at input powers of (a) 1W/µm and (b) 10W/µm, for samples 1cm (dashed line) and 2cm (solid line) in length.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E TE ω ( z , y ) = A ( y ) f ω ( z ) e i k 0 N ω y , E TM 2 ω ( z , y ) = ν B ν ( y ) f 2 ω ν ( z ) e i 2 k 0 N 2 ω ν y
2 E TE ω y 2 + 2 E TE ω z 2 + k 0 2 ( n o ω ( z ) ) 2 E TE ω + 2 k 0 2 d 15 E TM 2 ω ( E TE ω ) * = 0
2 E TM 2 ω y 2 + ( n es 2 ω ) 2 ( n os 2 ω ) 2 2 E TM 2 ω z 2 + 4 k 0 2 ( n e 2 ω ( z ) ) 2 E TM 2 ω + 4 k 0 2 d 31 ( E TE ω ) 2 = 0
n o , e ( z ) = n os , es + Δ n o , e exp ( z z 0 σ oi , ei ) 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.