Effect of metal complexation on the nonlinear optical response of a conjugated ligand

F. Khammar; A. P. Kerasidou; K. Iliopoulos; P. Savel; H. Akdas-Kilig; Y. Hamaizi; J.-L. Fillaut; B. Sahraoui

doi:10.1364/JOSAB.31.001555

Journal of the Optical Society of America B
Vol. 31,
Issue 7,
pp. 1555-1560
(2014)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.31.001555

Effect of metal complexation on the nonlinear optical response of a conjugated ligand

F. Khammar, A. P. Kerasidou, K. Iliopoulos, P. Savel, H. Akdas-Kilig, Y. Hamaizi, J.-L. Fillaut, and B. Sahraoui

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
F. Khammar, A. P. Kerasidou, K. Iliopoulos, P. Savel, H. Akdas-Kilig, Y. Hamaizi, J.-L. Fillaut, and B. Sahraoui, "Effect of metal complexation on the nonlinear optical response of a conjugated ligand," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 1555-1560 (2014)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

Organic nonlinear optical materials are widely investigated materials for fabricating optoelectronic devices. Particularly organic $π$ -conjugated systems as well as transition metal complex compounds are studied in this direction because of the strong electronic coupling between the ligand and the metal, their excellent chemical stability, and their rich photochemical and photophysical properties. In this work, comparative studies of the third-order nonlinear optical susceptibilities of a bipyridine ligand (4-(N,N-dibutylamino)- $4^{'}$ -(5-ethynyl- $2, 2^{'}$ -bipyridine)-azobenzene (A) and of the corresponding heteroleptic ruthenium complex ( $Ru {(bpy)}_{2} (La) {({PF}_{6})}_{2}$ (B) (La signifies the ligand) are presented. The NLO properties were investigated by means of the Z-scan technique using a 30 ps mode-locked $Nd - {YVO}_{4}$ laser at 532 nm with a repetition rate of 10 Hz. Our results show that the introduction of the metal in the organic complex results in a significant modification of the third-order nonlinear optical response.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

Nonlinear absorption reversing between an electroactive ligand and its metal complexes

Konstantinos Iliopoulos, Abdelkrim El-Ghayoury, Hasnaa El Ouazzani, Mindaugas Pranaitis, Esmah Belhadj, Emilie Ripaud, Miloud Mazari, Marc Sallé, Denis Gindre, and Bouchta Sahraoui
Opt. Express 20(23) 25311-25316 (2012)

Two-photon absorption characterization and comparison of Au(I) fluorenyl benzothiazole complexes in the visible wavelength regime

Trenton R. Ensley, Ryan M. O’Donnell, Joseph J. Mihaly, Joy E. Haley, Tod A. Grusenmeyer, and Thomas G. Gray
Appl. Opt. 60(25) G199-G206 (2021)

Third-order nonlinear optical response and optical limiting of colloidal carbon dots

Panagiotis Aloukos, Irini Papagiannouli, Athanasios B. Bourlinos, Radek Zboril, and Stelios Couris
Opt. Express 22(10) 12013-12027 (2014)

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (6)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

	Solvent	$λ_{abs}$ (nm)	$ε \cdot 10^{- 2} (L \cdot {mol}^{- 1} \cdot {cm}^{- 1})$
A	DCM	343, 472	25, 29
B	DCM	289, 321, 353, 487	73, 30, 27, 42

C(mM)	$β (\times 10^{- 11} m / W)$	$γ^{'} (\times 10^{- 18} m^{2} / W)$	$Im χ^{(3)} (\times 10^{- 13} esu)$	$Re χ^{(3)} (\times 10^{- 13} esu)$	$γ (\times 10^{- 31} esu)$
0.25	$0.38 \pm 0.07$	$- 2.36 \pm 0.14$	$0.21 \pm 0.04$	$- 3.03 \pm 0.18$	$6.9 \pm 0.7$
0.50	$0.78 \pm 0.23$	$- 3.75 \pm 0.35$	$0.43 \pm 0.12$	$- 4.82 \pm 0.45$
1.00	$1.42 \pm 0.33$	$- 8.61 \pm 0.11$	$0.77 \pm 0.18$	$- 11.06 \pm 0.14$
1.50	$2.59 \pm 0.70$	$- 12.35 \pm 0.28$	$1.41 \pm 0.38$	$- 15.86 \pm 0.35$
2.00	$3.37 \pm 0.70$	$- 19.16 \pm 0.65$	$1.83 \pm 0.38$	$- 24.59 \pm 0.83$

C (mM)	$β (\times 10^{- 1} m / w)$	$Im χ^{(3)} (\times 10^{- 13} esu)$	$γ (Im γ) (\times 10^{- 13} esu)$
0.05	$- 0.36 \pm 0.15$	$- 0.19 \pm 0.15$	$1.9 \pm 0.5$
0.10	$- 0.70 \pm 0.26$	$- 0.38 \pm 0.17$
0.15	$- 0.97 \pm 0.30$	$- 0.53 \pm 0.19$
0.20	$- 1.33 \pm 0.50$	$- 0.72 \pm 0.27$
0.25	$- 1.70 \pm 0.53$	$- 0.92 \pm 0.30$

	Solvent	$λ_{abs}$ (nm)	$ε \cdot 10^{- 2} (L \cdot {mol}^{- 1} \cdot {cm}^{- 1})$
A	DCM	343, 472	25, 29
B	DCM	289, 321, 353, 487	73, 30, 27, 42

C(mM)	$β (\times 10^{- 11} m / W)$	$γ^{'} (\times 10^{- 18} m^{2} / W)$	$Im χ^{(3)} (\times 10^{- 13} esu)$	$Re χ^{(3)} (\times 10^{- 13} esu)$	$γ (\times 10^{- 31} esu)$
0.25	$0.38 \pm 0.07$	$- 2.36 \pm 0.14$	$0.21 \pm 0.04$	$- 3.03 \pm 0.18$	$6.9 \pm 0.7$
0.50	$0.78 \pm 0.23$	$- 3.75 \pm 0.35$	$0.43 \pm 0.12$	$- 4.82 \pm 0.45$
1.00	$1.42 \pm 0.33$	$- 8.61 \pm 0.11$	$0.77 \pm 0.18$	$- 11.06 \pm 0.14$
1.50	$2.59 \pm 0.70$	$- 12.35 \pm 0.28$	$1.41 \pm 0.38$	$- 15.86 \pm 0.35$
2.00	$3.37 \pm 0.70$	$- 19.16 \pm 0.65$	$1.83 \pm 0.38$	$- 24.59 \pm 0.83$

Abstract

Cited By

Figures (6)

Tables (3)

Equations (3)

Journal of the Optical Society of America B