Abstract
The point-scanned dual-axis confocal (PS-DAC) microscope has been shown to exhibit superior capability to reject out-of-focus and multiply scattered light in comparison to its conventional single-axis counterpart. However, the slow frame rate (typically ) resulting from point-by-point data collection makes these systems vulnerable to motion artifacts. While video-rate point-scanned confocal microscopy is possible, a line-scanned dual-axis confocal (LS-DAC) microscope provides a simpler means of achieving high-speed imaging through line-by-line data collection, but sacrifices contrast due to loss of confocality along one dimension. Here we evaluate the performance trade-offs between an LS-DAC and PS-DAC microscope with identical spatial resolutions. Characterization experiments of the LS-DAC and PS-DAC microscopes with tissue phantoms, in reflectance mode, are shown to match results from Monte Carlo scattering simulations of the systems. Fluorescence images of mouse brain vasculature, obtained using resolution-matched LS-DAC and PS-DAC microscopes, demonstrate the comparable performance of LS-DAC and PS-DAC microscopy at shallow depths.
© 2013 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
C. Yin, A.K. Glaser, S. Y. Leigh, Y. Chen, L. Wei, P. C. S. Pillai, M. C. Rosenberg, S. Abeytunge, G. Peterson, C. Glazowski, N. Sanai, M. J. Mandella, M. Rajadhyaksha, and J. T. C. Liu
Biomed. Opt. Express 7(2) 251-263 (2016)
D. Wang, D. Meza, Y. Wang, L. Gao, and J. T. C. Liu
Opt. Lett. 39(18) 5431-5434 (2014)
Ye Chen, Danni Wang, and Jonathan T. C. Liu
Opt. Lett. 37(21) 4495-4497 (2012)