OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 37, Iss. 27 — Sep. 20, 1998
  • pp: 6468–6479

Lidar-signal compression by photomultiplier gain modulation: influence of detector nonlinearity

Michael P. Bristow  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 37, Issue 27, pp. 6468-6479 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.006468


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (236 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The application of photomultiplier gain modulation to the compression of wide-dynamic-range lidar signals is investigated in relation to the effect of the gain level on anode-signal linearity. Gain reduction is achieved by the coupling of modulation signals through either multidynode or focus-grid gating networks. This technique facilitates signal recovery and prevents detector nonlinearity and dynode damage caused by high near-field lidar signals. The measurements were performed in the current mode primarily on a 50-mm-diameter, 12-stage photomultiplier (EMI 9214) with a bialkali photocathode. With 3- or 4-dynode-based modulation made at a photomultiplier voltage of 1300 V and a gain of 1 × 107, signals of ∼6 mA can be maintained at the 1% linearity limit from 100% to 0.2% modulation, corresponding to a 500-fold reduction in the lidar-signal dynamic range. A significant advantage to dynode modulation is that it preserves the shot-signal-to-noise ratio of the incoming signal, which is not true for focus-grid modulation or external predetection schemes such as controlled obscuration or Pockels-cell modulation that attenuate the as-yet unamplified signal.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.5250) Detectors : Photomultipliers
(120.0280) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Remote sensing and sensors
(230.5160) Optical devices : Photodetectors
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors

History
Original Manuscript: October 27, 1997
Revised Manuscript: April 9, 1998
Published: September 20, 1998

Citation
Michael P. Bristow, "Lidar-signal compression by photomultiplier gain modulation: influence of detector nonlinearity," Appl. Opt. 37, 6468-6479 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-37-27-6468


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Shimizu, Y. Sasano, H. Nakane, N. Sugimoto, I. Matsui, N. Takeuchi, “Large scale laser radar for measuring aerosol distribution over a wide area,” Appl. Opt. 24, 617–626 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. S. Lehmann, V. Wulfmeyer, J. Bösenberg, “Time-dependent attenuator for dynamic range reduction of lidar signals,” Appl. Opt. 36, 3469–3474 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. P. Bristow, D. H. Bundy, A. G. Wright, “Signal linearity, gain stability, and gating in photomultipliers: application to differential adsorption lidar,” Appl. Opt. 34, 4437–4452 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. R. A. Kaplan, R. J. Daly, “Performance limits and design procedure for all-weather terrestrial rangefinders,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE3, 428–435 (1967). [CrossRef]
  5. V. Cohen, “Gain correction in laser rangefinders,” Electron. Eng. 40, 260–262 (1968).
  6. R. J. Allen, W. E. Evans, “Laser radar (LIDAR) for mapping aerosol structure,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 1422–1432 (1972). [CrossRef]
  7. E. V. Browell, A. F. Carter, S. T. Shipley, R. J. Allen, C. F. Butler, M. N. Mayo, J. H. Siviter, W. H. Hall, “NASA multipurpose airborne DIAL system and measurements of ozone aerosol profiles,” Appl. Opt. 22, 522–534 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. H. Edner, K. Fredriksson, A. Sunesson, S. Svanberg, L. Unéus, W. Wendt, “Mobile remote sensing system for atmospheric monitoring,” Appl. Opt. 26, 4330–4338 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. H. J. Kölsch, P. Rairoux, J. P. Wolf, L. Wöste, “Simultaneous NO and NO2 DIAL measurement using BBO crystals,” Appl. Opt. 28, 2052–2056 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. U. Kempfer, W. Carnuth, R. Lotz, T. Trickl, “A wide-range ultraviolet lidar system for tropospheric ozone measurements: development and application,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 3145–3164 (1994). [CrossRef]
  11. “Photomultiplier tubes: principles and applications,” Publ. D-PMT-AB/USA (Philips Photonics, Slaterville, R.I., 1994).
  12. R. W. Engstrom, “RCA photomultiplier handbook,” Publ. PMT-62, 1980 (available from Burle Industries, Inc., Lancaster, Pa., as Publ. TP-136, 1989).
  13. J. P. Boutot, J. Nussli, D. Vallat, “Recent trends in photomultipliers for nuclear physics,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, P. W. Hawkes, ed. (Academic, New York, 1983), Vol. 60, pp. 223–305. [CrossRef]
  14. “Light sources, monochromators, spectrographs, detectors, and fiber optics,” Oriel Catalogue (Oriel Corp., Stratford, Conn., 1994), Vol. 2, pp. 4–7.
  15. C. G. Morgan, Y. Hua, A. C. Mitchell, J. G. Murray, A. D. Boardman, “A compact frequency domain fluorometer with a directly modulated deuterium light source,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 41–47 (1996). [CrossRef]
  16. R. W. Engstrom, E. Fischer, “Effects of voltage-divider characteristics on multiplier phototube response,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 28, 525–527 (1957). [CrossRef]
  17. “Voltage divider design,” Applications Note R/P 069 (Thorn EMI Electron Tubes, Ltd., Ruislip, Middlesex, UK, 1982).
  18. Y. K. Semertzidis, F. J. M. Farley, “Effect of light flash on photocathodes,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 394, 7–12 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. Photomultiplier Catalogue, Publ. PMC/93 (Thorn EMI Electron Tubes, Ltd., Ruislip, Middlesex, UK, 1993).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited