OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 38, Iss. 12 — Apr. 20, 1999
  • pp: 2377–2383

Spectral Dependence of the Scattering Coefficient in Case 1 and Case 2 Waters

Richard W. Gould Jr., Robert A. Arnone, and Paul M. Martinolich  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 38, Issue 12, pp. 2377-2383 (1999)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (201 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



An approximate linear relationship between the scattering coefficient and the wavelength of light in the visible is found in case 1 and case 2 waters. From this relationship, we estimate scattering at an unknown wavelength from scattering at a single measured wavelength. This approximation is based on measurements in a 1.5-m-thick surface layer collected with an AC9 instrument at 63 stations in the Arabian Sea, northern Gulf of Mexico, and coastal North Carolina. The light-scattering coefficient at 412 nm ranged from 0.2 to 15.1 m<sup>−1</sup> in these waters, and the absorption coefficient at 412 nm ranged from 0.2 to 4.0 m<sup>−1</sup>. A separate data set for 100 stations from Oceanside, California, and Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, was used to validate the relationship. Although the Oceanside waters were considerably different from the developmental data set (based on absorption-to-scattering ratios and single-scattering albedos), the average error between modeled and measured scattering values was 6.0% for the entire test data set over all wavelengths (without regard to sign). The slope of the spectral scattering relationship decreases progressively from high-scattering, turbid waters dominated by suspended sediments to lower-scattering, clear waters dominated by phytoplankton.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.4450) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Oceanic optics
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.5820) Scattering : Scattering measurements
(290.5850) Scattering : Scattering, particles

Richard W. Gould Jr., Robert A. Arnone, and Paul M. Martinolich, "Spectral Dependence of the Scattering Coefficient in Case 1 and Case 2 Waters," Appl. Opt. 38, 2377-2383 (1999)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. A. Morel and B. Gentili, “Diffuse reflectance of oceanic waters. III. Implication of bidirectionality for the remote-sensing problem,” Appl. Opt. 35, 4850–4862 (1996).
  2. A. Morel and L. Prieur, “Analysis of variations in ocean color,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 709–722 (1977).
  3. Z. P. Lee, K. L. Carder, S. K. Hawes, R. G. Steward, T. G. Peacock, and C. O. Davis, “Model for the interpretation of hyperspectral remote-sensing reflectance,” Appl. Opt. 33, 5721–5732 (1994).
  4. S. A. Garver and D. A. Siegel, “Inherent optical property inversion of ocean color spectra and its biogeochemical interpretation. 1. Time series from the Sargasso Sea,” J. Geophys. Res. 102, 18,607–18,625 (1997).
  5. H. R. Gordon and G. C. Boynton, “Radiance–irradiance inversion algorithm for estimating the absorption and backscattering coefficients of natural waters: homogeneous waters,” Appl. Opt. 36, 2636–2641 (1997).
  6. Z. P. Lee, K. L. Carder, T. G. Peacock, C. O. Davis, and J. L. Mueller, “Method to derive ocean absorption coefficients from remote-sensing reflectance,” Appl. Opt. 35, 453–462 (1996).
  7. C. S. Roesler and M. J. Perry, “In situ phytoplankton absorption, fluorescence emission, and particulate backscattering spectra determined from reflectance,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13,279–13,294 (1995).
  8. M. Sydor, R. A. Arnone, R. W. Gould, Jr., G. E. Terrie, S. D. Ladner, and C. G. Wood, “Remote sensing technique for determination of volume absorption coefficient of turbid water,” Appl. Opt. 37, 4944–4950 (1998).
  9. H. R. Gordon and A. Morel, Remote Assessment of Ocean Color for Interpretation of Satellite Visible Imagery: A Review (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983).
  10. A. Morel, “Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (case I waters),” J. Geophys. Res. 93, 10,749–10,768 (1988).
  11. A. Bricaud, A. Morel, and L. Prieur, “Optical efficiency factors of some phytoplankters,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 28, 816–832 (1983).
  12. D. Stramski and D. A. Kiefer, “Light scattering by microorganisms in the open ocean,” Prog. Oceanogr. 28, 343–383 (1991).
  13. D. Stramski and C. D. Mobley, “Effects of microbial particles on oceanic optics: a database of single-particle optical properties,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 538–549 (1997).
  14. A. Morel and Y.-H. Ahn, “Optical efficiency factors for free-living marine bacteria: influence of bacterioplankton upon the optical properties and particulate organic carbon in oceanic waters,” J. Mar. Res. 48, 145–175 (1990).
  15. A. Morel and Y.-H. Ahn, “Optics of heterotrophic nanoflagellates and ciliates: a tentative assessment of their scattering role in oceanic waters compared to those of bacterial and algal cells,” J. Mar. Res. 49, 177–202 (1991).
  16. W. S. Pegau, J. S. Cleveland, W. Doss, C. D. Kennedy, R. A. Maffione, J. L. Mueller, R. Stone, C. C. Trees, A. D. Weidemann, W. H. Wells, and J. R. V. Zaneveld, “A comparison of methods for the measurement of the absorption coefficient in natural waters,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13,201–13,220 (1995).
  17. T. J. Petzold, “Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters,” Scripps Institution of Oceanography Ref. 72–78, 79 pp. (1972).
  18. R. W. Austin and T. J. Petzold, “Spectral dependence of the diffuse attenuation coefficient of light in ocean waters,” in Ocean Optics VII, M. A. Blizzard, ed., Proc. SPIE 489, 168–178 (1984).
  19. WETLabs, Inc., “AC9 Protocol Manual,” www.wetlabs.com (1998).
  20. J. R. V. Zaneveld, J. C. Kitchen, and C. Moore, “The scattering error correction of reflecting-tube absorption meters,” in Ocean Optics XII, J. S. Jaffe, ed., Proc. SPIE 2258, 44–55 (1994).
  21. R. M. Pope and E. S. Fry, “Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements,” Appl. Opt. 36, 8710–8723 (1997).
  22. R. C. Smith and K. S. Baker, “Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200–800 nm),” Appl. Opt. 20, 177–184 (1981).
  23. A. H. Barnard, W. S. Pegau, and J. R. V. Zaneveld, “Global relationships of the inherent optical properties of the oceans,” J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24,955–24,968 (1998).
  24. M. Sydor and R. A. Arnone, “Effect of suspended particulate and dissolved organic matter on remote sensing of coastal and riverine waters,” Appl. Opt. 36, 6905–6912 (1997).
  25. W. M. Balch, P. M. Holligan, S. G. Ackleson, and K. J. Voss, “Biological and optical properties of mesoscale coccolithophore blooms in the Gulf of Maine,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 629–643 (1991).
  26. R. A. Maffione and D. R. Dana, “Instruments and methods for measuring the backward-scattering coefficient of ocean waters,” Appl. Opt. 36, 6057–6067 (1997).
  27. A. Morel and A. Bricaud, “Theoretical results concerning the optics of phytoplankton, with special reference to remote sensing applications,” in Oceanography from Space, J. F. R. Gower, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1981), pp. 313–327.
  28. C. H. Whitlock, L. R. Poole, and W. M. Houghton, “Spectral scattering properties of turbid waters,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 81–84 (1980).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited