OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 39, Iss. 34 — Dec. 1, 2000
  • pp: 6360–6365

Use of confocal microscopes in conoscopy and ellipsometry. 1. Electromagnetic theory

Peter Varga  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 39, Issue 34, pp. 6360-6365 (2000)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (95 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



An optical system consisting of two objective lenses in a confocal arrangement is examined. It is shown that a simple algebraic relation exists between the electric field in the back focal plane of the first objective lens, which focuses the incident light, and the Fourier transform of the electric field in the focal plane of the same lens. The relation holds for high angles. If a thin object is placed in the focal plane it is possible to write the electric field by use of a Fourier transform relation at the exit aperture of the second lens. The theory is generalized for objects that are positioned at oblique angles with respect to the optical axis of the system. This configuration is clearly identical to the setup of a spatially resolving ellipsometer.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(050.1960) Diffraction and gratings : Diffraction theory
(180.0180) Microscopy : Microscopy
(260.0260) Physical optics : Physical optics
(260.2110) Physical optics : Electromagnetic optics
(260.2130) Physical optics : Ellipsometry and polarimetry

Original Manuscript: March 22, 2000
Revised Manuscript: July 18, 2000
Published: December 1, 2000

Peter Varga, "Use of confocal microscopes in conoscopy and ellipsometry. 1. Electromagnetic theory," Appl. Opt. 39, 6360-6365 (2000)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. Erman, J. B. Theeten, “Spatially resolved ellipsometry,” J. Appl. Phys. 60, 859–873 (1986). [CrossRef]
  2. K. K. Svitashev, A. I. Semenko, L. V. Semenko, V. K. Sokolov, “Ellipsometer based on convergent light beam,” Opt. Spectrosc. 34, 542–544 (1973).
  3. B. Richards, E. Wolf, “Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems. II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 253, 358–379 (1959). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Török, P. Varga, Z. Laczik, R. Booker, “Electromagnetic diffraction of light focused through a planar interface between materials of mismatched refractive indices: an integral representation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 325–332 (1995). [CrossRef]
  5. P. Török, P. D. Higdon, T. Wilson, “On the general properties of polarised light conventional and confocal microscopes,” Opt. Commun. 148, 300–315 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. V. S. Ignatovsky, “Diffraction by a paraboloidal mirror with arbitrary aperture,” Trans. Opt. Inst. 1(5), 1–30 (1920).
  7. P. Varga, P. Török, “Focusing of electromagnetic waves by paraboloidal mirrors. I. Theory,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (to be published).
  8. P. Török, “Focusing of electromagnetic waves through a dielectric interface by lenses of finite Fresnel number,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 3009–3015 (1998). [CrossRef]
  9. C. J. R. Sheppard, P. Török, “Dependence of Fresnel number on aperture stop position,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 3016–3019 (1998). [CrossRef]
  10. C. J. R. Sheppard, T. Wilson, “The image of a single point in microscopes of large numerical aperture,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 379, 145–158 (1982). [CrossRef]
  11. S. Shatalin, R. Juškaitis, J. B. Tan, T. Wilson, “Reflection conoscopy and microellipsometry of isotropic thin film structures,” J. Microsc. 179, 241–252 (1995). [CrossRef]
  12. P. Török, P. D. Higdon, T. Wilson, “Theory for confocal and conventional microscopes imaging small dielectric scatterers,” J. Mod. Opt. 45, 1681–1698 (1998). [CrossRef]
  13. J. J. Stamnes, D. Jiang, “Focusing of electromagnetic waves into a uniaxial crystal,” Opt. Commun. 150, 251–262 (1998). [CrossRef]
  14. D. Jiang, J. J. Stamnes, “Numerical and asymptotic results for focusing of two-dimensional waves in uniaxial crystals,” Opt. Commun. 163, 55–71 (1999). [CrossRef]
  15. P. Török, P. D. Higdon, R. Juškaitis, T. Wilson, “Optimising the image contrast of conventional and confocal optical microscopes imaging finite sized spherical gold scatterers,” Opt. Commun. 155, 335–341 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. P. D. Higdon, P. Török, T. Wilson, “Imaging properties of high aperture multiphoton fluorescence scanning microscopes,” J. Microsc. 193, 127–141 (1999). [CrossRef]
  17. P. Török, “Imaging of small birefringent objects by polarised light conventional and confocal microscopy,” Opt. Commun. 181, 7–18 (2000). [CrossRef]
  18. C. J. R. Sheppard, P. Török, “An electromagnetic theory of imaging in fluorescence microscopy and imaging in polarization fluorescence microscopy,” Bioimag. 5, 205–218 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. J. J. Stamnes, Waves in Focal Regions (Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1986).
  20. R. K. Luneburg, Mathematical Theory of Optics, 2nd ed. (U. of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1996).
  21. W. Wang, A. T. Friberg, E. Wolf, “Structure of focused fields in systems with large Fresnel numbers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1947–1953 (1995). [CrossRef]
  22. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 1st ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  23. L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1985).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1 Fig. 2

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited