OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 41, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 2002
  • pp: 7092–7101

Effect of suspended particulate-size distribution on the backscattering ratio in the remote sensing of seawater

Dubravko Risović  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 41, Issue 33, pp. 7092-7101 (2002)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (186 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Mie theory is used to study the influence of the particle-size distribution (PSD) on the backscattering ratio for case 1 and 2 waters. Several in situ measured PSDs from coastal water and the open ocean, representing typical case 2 and 1 waters, were used in this investigation. Calculation of the backscattering ratio requires integration of the PSD over a much broader size range than is usually measured. Consequently extrapolation from fitted data is necessary. To that purpose the measured data are fitted with hyperbolic (Junge) and the two-component model of the PSD. It is shown that the result of extrapolation, hence the backscattering ratio, critically depends on the chosen PSD model. For a particular PSD model the role of submicrometer particles and the applied integration limits on the backscattering ratio is discussed. The use of the hyperbolic PSD model largely overestimates the number of small (submicrometer) particles that significantly contribute to backscattering and consequently leads to an erroneously high backscattering ratio. The two-component model proves to be an adequate PSD model for use in backscattering/scattering calculations providing satisfactory results complying with experimental data. The results are relevant for the inversion of remotely sensed data and the prediction of optical properties and the concentration of phytoplankton pigments, suspended sediment, and yellow substance.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.4450) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Oceanic optics
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors
(290.1350) Scattering : Backscattering
(290.4020) Scattering : Mie theory
(290.5850) Scattering : Scattering, particles

Dubravko Risović, "Effect of suspended particulate-size distribution on the backscattering ratio in the remote sensing of seawater," Appl. Opt. 41, 7092-7101 (2002)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. L. Prieur and S. Sathyendranath, “An optical classification of coastal and oceanic waters based on the specific spectral absorption of phytoplankton pigments, dissolved organic matter, and other particulate materials,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 671–689 (1981).
  2. H. R. Gordon and A. Morel, “Remote assessment of ocean color for interpretation of satellite visible imagery: a review,” in Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies, M. Bowman, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983).
  3. J. R. V. Zaneveld, “Remotely sensed reflectance and its dependence on vertical structure: theoretical derivation,” Appl. Opt. 21, 4146–4150 (1982).
  4. H. R. Gordon, O. B. Brown, and M. M. Jacobs, “Computed relationship between the inherent and apparent optical properties of flat homogenous ocean,” Appl. Opt. 14, 417–427 (1975).
  5. H. R. Gordon, “Ocean color remote sensing: influence of the particle phase function and the solar zenith angle,” Eos (Trans. Am. Geophys. Union) 14, 1055–1061 (1986).
  6. A. Morel and B. Gentili, “Diffuse reflectance of oceanic waters. III Implication of bidirectionality for the remote-sensing problem,” Appl. Opt. 35, 4850–4862 (1996).
  7. A. Morel and L. Prieur, “Analysis of variations in ocean color,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 709–722 (1977).
  8. J. R. V. Zaneveld, “A theoretical derivation of the dependence of the remotely sensed reflectance of the ocean on the inherent optical properties,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13,135–13,142 (1995)
  9. R. W. Gould, Jr., R. A. Arnone, and P. M. Martinolich, “Spectral dependence of the scattering coefficient in case 1 and case 2 waters,” Appl. Opt. 38, 2377–2383 (1999).
  10. S. Tassan “Local algorithms using SeaWiFS data for the retrieval of phytoplankton, pigments, suspended sediment, and yellow substance in coastal waters,” Appl. Opt. 33, 2369–2378 (1994).
  11. A. H. Barnard, J. R. V. Zaneveld, and W. S. Pegau, “In situ determination of the remotely sensed reflectance and the absorption coefficient: closure and inversion,” Appl. Opt. 38, 5108–5117 (1999).
  12. J. E. O’Reilly, S. Maritorena, B. G. Mitchell, D. A. Siegel, K. L. Carder, S. A. Garver, M. Mahru, and C. McClain, “Ocean color chlorophyll algorithms for SeaWiFS,” J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24,937–24,953 (1998).
  13. Z. Lee and K. L. Carder, “Band-ratio or spectral-curvature algorithms for satellite remote sensing?” Appl. Opt. 39, 4377–4380 (2000).
  14. W. Spinrad, ed., Ocean Optics (Wiley, New York, 1994).
  15. M. Sydor and R. A. Arnone, “Effect of suspended particulate and dissolved organic matter on remote sensing of coastal and riverine waters,” Appl. Opt. 36, 6905–6912 (1997).
  16. A. Bricaud, A. Morel, M. Babin, K. Allali, and H. Claustre, “Variations of light absorption by suspended particles with chlorophyll-a concentration in oceanic (case 1) waters: analysis and implications for bio-optical models,” J. Geophys. Res. 103, 31,033–31,044 (1998).
  17. O. Ulloa, S. Sathyendranath, and T. Platt, “Effect of the particle-size distribution on the backscattering ratio in seawater,” Appl. Opt. 33, 7070–7077 (1994).
  18. R. P. Stumpf and J. R. Pennock, “Remote estimation of the diffuse attenuation coefficient in a moderately turbid estuary,” Remote Sens. Environ. 38, 183–191 (1991).
  19. H. Bader, “The hyperbolic distribution of particle sizes,” J. Geophys. Res. 75, 2822–2830 (1970)
  20. C. E. Junge, Air Chemistry and Radioactivity (Academic, New York, 1963), p.382
  21. D. Risović and M. Martinis, “A comparative analysis of sea-particle-size distribution models,” Fiz. B 4 (2), 111–120 (1995).
  22. D. Risović, “Two component model of the sea particle size distribution,” Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Papers 40, 1459–1473 (1993).
  23. R. C. Smith and K. S. Baker, “Optical properties of the clearest natural waters (200–800 nm),” Appl. Opt. 20, 177–184 (1981).
  24. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  25. R. Reuter, “Characterization of marine particle suspensions by light scattering I (1980). Numerical predictions from Mie theory,” Oceanologica Acta 3, 317–332 (1980).
  26. J. E. Harris, “Characterization of suspended matter in the Gulf of Mexico—II Particle size analysis of suspended matter from deep water,” Deep-Sea Res. 24, 1055–1061 (1977).
  27. J. C. Kitchen and J. R. Zaneveld, “On the noncorrelation of the vertical structure of light scattering and chlorophyll a in case I waters,” J. Geophys. Res. 95, 20,237–20,246 (1990).
  28. H. J. Pak, R. V. Zaneveld, and G. F. Beardsley, Jr., “Mie scattering by suspended clay particles,” J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5065–5069 (1971).
  29. H. J. Pak, R. V. Zaneveld, and G. F. Beardsley, Jr., “Particle size distribution in the Eastern equatorial Pacific,” J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5070–5077 (1971).
  30. M. Jonasz and G. Fournier, “Approximation of the size distribution of marine particles by a sum of lognormal functions,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 744–754 (1996).
  31. M. Jonasz, “Particle size distributions in the Baltic,” Tellus Ser B 35, 345–358 (1983).
  32. M. Jonasz and H. Prandtke, “Comparison of measured and computed light scattering in the Baltic,” Tellus Ser. B 38, 144–157 (1986).
  33. D. Stramski and D. A. Kiefer, “Light scattering by microorganisms in the open ocean,” Prog. Oceanogr. 28, 343–383 (1991).
  34. R. W. Sheldon, A. Prakash, and W. H. Sutclife, Jr., “The size distribution of particles in the ocean,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 327–340 (1972).
  35. R. W. Sheldon, Government of Canada, Fisheries and Oceans, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, St. John’s, Newfoundland, A1C5x1 (personal communication, 1990).
  36. J. R. V. Zaneveld, D. M. Roach, and H. Pak, “The determination of the index of refraction of particles suspended in the ocean,” J. Geophys. Res. 77, 2677–2680 (1974).
  37. A. Bricaud and A. Morel, “Light attenuation and scattering by phytoplanktonic cells: a theoretical modeling,” Appl. Opt. 25, 571–580 (1986).
  38. R. W. Spinrad and J. F. Brown, “Relative real refractive index of marine microorganisms: a technique for flow cytometric estimation,” Appl. Opt. 25, 1930–1934 (1986).
  39. M. S. Twardowski, E. Boss, J. B. Macdonald, W. S. Pegau, A. H. Barnard, and R. V. Zaneveld, “A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in Case I and II waters,” J. Geophys. Res. 106, (C7), 14,129–14,142 (2001).
  40. J. B. Macdonald, M. S. Twardowski, W. S. Pegau, A. H. Barnard, E. Boss, and R. V. Zaneveld, “Characterization of spectral backscattering in the Gulf of California,” Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 80 (49), OS22E-12 (2000). Ocean Sci. Meet. Suppl.
  41. T. J. Petzold, “Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters”, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Rep. 72–78 (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Calif., 1972).
  42. R/V Barnes cruise (August 1998), http://ocean.washington.edu/data.
  43. A. Morel, “Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (Case I waters),” J. Geophys. Res. 93, 10,749–10,768 (1988).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited