OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 44, Iss. 9 — Mar. 21, 2005
  • pp: 1614–1624

Comparison of relative signal-to-noise ratios of different classes of imaging spectrometer

R. Glenn Sellar and Glenn D. Boreman  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 44, Issue 9, pp. 1614-1624 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.001614


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (148 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The continued development of new and fundamentally different classes of imaging spectrometer has increased both the scope and the complexity of comparisons of their relative signal-to-noise ratios. Although the throughput and multiplex advantages of Fourier-transform spectrometers were established in the early 1950s, the application of this terminology to imaging spectrometers is often ambiguous and has led to some confusion and debate. For comparisons of signal-collection abilities to be useful to a system designer, they must be based on identical requirements and constraints. We present unambiguous definitions of terminology for application to imaging spectrometers and comparisons of signal-collection abilities and signal-to-noise-ratios on a basis that is useful to a systems designer and inclusive of six fundamentally different classes (both traditional and novel) of imaging spectrometers.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: January 19, 2004
Revised Manuscript: June 22, 2004
Manuscript Accepted: November 19, 2004
Published: March 20, 2005

Citation
R. Glenn Sellar and Glenn D. Boreman, "Comparison of relative signal-to-noise ratios of different classes of imaging spectrometer," Appl. Opt. 44, 1614-1624 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-44-9-1614


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. G. Sellar, G. D. Boreman, “Classification of imaging spectrometers for remote sensing applications,” Opt. Eng. (to be published).
  2. P. Jacquinot, C. Dufour, “Condition optique d’emploi des cellules photo-électriques dans les spectrographes et les interférometrès,” J. Rech. Centre Nat. Rech. Sci. Lab. Bellevue 6, 91–103 (1948).
  3. P. Jacquinot, “The etendue advantage,” presented at the Seventeenth XVII Meeting of Congrès du Groupment avancement des méthodes d’analyse spectrométriques (Paris, 1954).
  4. P. Jacquinot, “Caractères communs aux nouvelles méthodes de spectroscopie interférentielle; facteur de mérite,” J. Phys. Radium 19, 223–229 (1958). [CrossRef]
  5. P. B. Fellgett, “The multiplex advantage,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 1951).
  6. P. B. Fellgett, “Multi-channel spectrometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 872 (1952).
  7. M. R. Descour, “Throughput advantage in imaging Fourier-transform spectrometers,” in Imaging Spectrometry II, M. R. Descour, J. M. Mooney, eds., Proc. SPIE2819, 285–290 (1996). [CrossRef]
  8. L. W. Schumann, T. S. Lomheim, “Infrared hyperspectral imaging Fourier transform and dispersive spectrometers: comparison of signal-to-noise based performance,” in Imaging Spectrometry VII, M. R. Descour, S. S. Shen, eds., Proc. SPIE4480, 1–14 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. E. L. Dereniak, G. D. Boreman, Infrared Detectors and Systems (Wiley, New York, 1996), pp. 45–48.
  10. J. C. Demro, R. Hartshorne, L. M. Woody, “Design of a multispectral, wedge filter, remote sensing instrument incorporating a multi-port, thinned, CCD area array,” in Imaging Spectroscopy, M. R. Descour, J. M. Mooney, D. L. Perry, L. R. Illing, eds., Proc. SPIE2480, 280–294 (1995).
  11. R. F. Horton, “Optical design for a high-etendue imaging Fourier-transform spectrometer,” in Imaging Spectrometry II, M. R. Descour, J. M. Mooney, eds., Proc. SPIE2819, 300–315 (1996). [CrossRef]
  12. Ref. 9, p. 165.
  13. F. D. Kahn, “The signal–noise ratio of a suggested spectral analyzer,” Astrophys. J. 129, 518–521 (1959). [CrossRef]
  14. S. P. Davis, M. C. Abrams, J. W. Brault, Fourier Transform Spectrometry (Academic, New York, 2001).
  15. P. J. Miller, A. R. Harvey, “Signal to noise analysis of various imaging systems,” in Biomarkers and Biological Spectral Imaging, G. H. Bearman, D. J. Bornhop, R. M. Levenson, eds., Proc. SPIE4259, 16–21 (2001). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited