OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: James C. Wyant
  • Vol. 47, Iss. 32 — Nov. 10, 2008
  • pp: 6033–6039

Compensating the intensity fall-off effect in cone-beam tomography by an empirical weight formula

Zikuan Chen, Vince D. Calhoun, and Shengjiang Chang  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 47, Issue 32, pp. 6033-6039 (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.006033


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (3020 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The Feldkamp–David–Kress (FDK) algorithm is widely adopted for cone-beam reconstruction due to its one-dimensional filtered backprojection structure and parallel implementation. In a reconstruction volume, the conspicuous cone-beam artifact manifests as intensity fall-off along the longitudinal direction (the gantry rotation axis). This effect is inherent to circular cone-beam tomography due to the fact that a cone-beam dataset acquired from circular scanning fails to meet the data sufficiency condition for volume reconstruction. Upon observations of the intensity fall-off phenomenon associated with the FDK reconstruction of a ball phantom, we propose an empirical weight formula to compensate for the fall-off degradation. Specifically, a reciprocal cosine can be used to compensate the voxel values along longitudinal direction during three-dimensional backprojection reconstruction, in particular for boosting the values of voxels at positions with large cone angles. The intensity degradation within the z plane, albeit insignificant, can also be compensated by using the same weight formula through a parameter for radial distance dependence. Computer simulations and phantom experiments are presented to demonstrate the compensation effectiveness of the fall-off effect inherent in circular cone-beam tomography.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(100.6950) Image processing : Tomographic image processing
(110.6960) Imaging systems : Tomography

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: April 23, 2007
Revised Manuscript: July 29, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: September 14, 2008
Published: November 5, 2008

Virtual Issues
Vol. 4, Iss. 1 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Zikuan Chen, Vince D. Calhoun, and Shengjiang Chang, "Compensating the intensity fall-off effect in cone-beam tomography by an empirical weight formula," Appl. Opt. 47, 6033-6039 (2008)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-47-32-6033


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Z. Chen, R. Ning, and D. Conover, “Accurate perspective projection calculation using a pixel-pyramid model for iterative cone-beam reconstruction,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 728-39 (2003).
  2. Z. Chen and R. Ning, “Pixel-pyramid model for divergent projection geometry,” Opt. Eng. 44, 027002 (2005).
  3. K. Mueller, R. Yagel, and J. J. Wheller, “Anti-aliased three-dimensional cone-beam reconstruction of low-contrast objects with algebraic methods,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18519-537 (1999).
  4. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging (IEEE, 1999).
  5. H. Turbell, “Cone-beam reconstruction using filtered backprojection,” Ph.D. thesis (Linkoping University, 2001).
  6. X. Wang and R. Ning, “A cone-beam reconstruction algorithm for circle-plus-arc data-acquisition geometry,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18, 815-824 (1999).
  7. Z. Chen, R. Ning, Y. Yu, and D. Conover, “3D PSF characterization of circle-plus-arc cone-beam tomography,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 664-675 (2005).
  8. P. Grangeat, “Mathematical framework of cone beam 3D reconstruction via the first derivative of the Radon transform,” in Mathematical Methods in Tomography, Vol. 1497 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, G.T.Herman, A. K. Louis, and F. Natterer, eds. (Springer-Verlag, 1991), pp. 66-97.
  9. H. K. Tuy, “An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 43, 546-552 (1983). [CrossRef]
  10. G. L. Zeng, R. Clack, and G. T. Gullberg, “Implementation of Tuy's cone-beam inversion formula,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 493-507 (1994). [CrossRef]
  11. X. Tang, J. Hsieh, A. Hagiwara, R. Nilsen, J. Thibault, and E. Drapkin, “A three-dimensional weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT under a circular source trajectory,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 3889-905 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 612-619 (1984).
  13. R. Ning, X. Tang, D. Conover, and R. Yu, “Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study,” Med. Phys. 30, 1694-1705 (2003). [CrossRef]
  14. R. Ning, B. Chen, R. Yu, D. Conover, X. Tang, and Y. Ning, “Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 19, 9494-963 (2000).
  15. M. Defrise and R. Clack, “A cone-beam reconstruction algorithm using shift-variant filtering and cone-beam backprojection,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 13, 186-195 (1994).
  16. Z. Chen and R. Ning, “Filling the Radon domain of computed tomography by local convex combination,” Appl. Opt. 42, 7043-7051 (2003). [CrossRef]
  17. C. Axelsson and P. Danielsson, “Three-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam data in O(N3log⁡N) time,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 477-491 (1994). [CrossRef]
  18. S. Schaller, T. Flohr, and P. Steffen, “An efficient Fourier method for 3D Radon inversion in exact cone-beam CT reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 17, 244-250 (1998).
  19. N. J. Dusaussoy, “Voir: A volumetric image reconstruction algorithm based on Fourier techniques for inversion of the 3-D Radon transform,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5, 121-131(1996). [CrossRef]
  20. D. Gottlieb, B. Gustafsson, and P. Forssen, “On the direct Fourier method for computer tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 19, 223-232 (2000).
  21. Z. Chen and R. Ning, “Super-gridded cone-beam reconstruction and its application to point-spread function calculation,” Appl. Opt. 44, 4615-4624 (2005). [CrossRef]
  22. Z. Chen and R. Ning, “Volume fusion of two-circular-orbits cone-beam tomography,” Appl. Opt. 45, 5960-5966(2006). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited