OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 48, Iss. 13 — May. 1, 2009
  • pp: 2585–2594

Shear stress in magnetorheological finishing for glasses

Chunlin Miao, Shai N. Shafrir, John C. Lambropoulos, Joni Mici, and Stephen D. Jacobs  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 48, Issue 13, pp. 2585-2594 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.002585


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (699 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We report in situ, simultaneous measurements of both drag and normal forces in magnetorheological finishing (MRF) for what is believed to be the first time, using a spot taking machine (STM) as a test bed to take MRF spots on stationary parts. The measurements are carried out over the entire area where material is being removed, i.e., the projected area of the MRF removal function/spot on the part surface, using a dual force sensor. This approach experimentally addresses the mechanisms governing material removal in MRF for optical glasses in terms of the hydrodynamic pressure and shear stress, applied by the hydrodynamic flow of magnetorheological fluid at the gap between the part surface and the STM wheel. This work demonstrates that the volumetric removal rate shows a positive linear dependence on shear stress. Shear stress exhibits a positive linear dependence on a material figure of merit that depends upon Young’s modulus, fracture toughness, and hardness. A modified Preston’s equation is proposed that better estimates MRF material removal rate for optical glasses by incorporating mechanical properties, shear stress, and velocity.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(160.4670) Materials : Optical materials
(220.4610) Optical design and fabrication : Optical fabrication
(220.5450) Optical design and fabrication : Polishing

ToC Category:
Optical Design and Fabrication

History
Original Manuscript: February 24, 2009
Revised Manuscript: April 1, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: April 1, 2009
Published: April 29, 2009

Citation
Chunlin Miao, Shai N. Shafrir, John C. Lambropoulos, Joni Mici, and Stephen D. Jacobs, "Shear stress in magnetorheological finishing for glasses," Appl. Opt. 48, 2585-2594 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-48-13-2585


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. D. Jacobs, D. Golini, Y. Hsu, B. E. Puchebner, D. Strafford, Wm. I. Kordonski, I. V. Prokhorov, E. Fess, D. Pietrowski, and V. W. Kordonski, “Magnetorheological finishing: A deterministic process for optics manufacturing,” Proc. SPIE 2576, 372-382 ( 1995). [CrossRef]
  2. S. D. Jacobs, S. Arrasmith, I. A. Kozhinova, L. L. Gregg, A. B. Shorey, H. J. Romanofsky, D. Golini, W. I. Kordonski, P. Dumas, and S. Hogan, “An overview of magnetorheological finishing (MRF) for precision optics manufacturing,” Ceramic Trans. 102, 185-199 (1999).
  3. F. W. Preston, “The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines,” J. Soc. Glass Technol. 11, 214-256 (1927).
  4. A. B. Shorey, “Mechanisms of material removal in magnetorheological finishing (mrf) of glass,” Ph.D. dissertation (Department of Mechancial Engineering, Materials Science Program, University of Rochester, 2000).
  5. V. H. Bulsara, Y. Ahn, S. Chandrasekar, and T. N. Farris, “Mechanics of polishing,” Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech. 65, 410-416 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. V. W. Kordonski and D. Golini, “Progress update in magnetorheological finshing,” in 6th International Conference on Electro-Rheological Fluid, Magnetorheological Suspensions and Their Applications (Yonezava, 1997).
  7. D. Golini, H. M. Pollicove, G. Platt, S. D. Jacobs, and W. Kordonsky, “Computer control makes asphere production run of the mill,” Laser Focus World 31(9), 83-86 (1995).
  8. A. B. Shorey, S. D. Jacobs, W. E. Kordonski, and R. F. Gans, “Experiments and observations regarding the mechanisms of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing,” Appl. Opt. 40, 20-33 (2001). [CrossRef]
  9. J. E. DeGroote, “Surface interactions between nanodiamonds and glass in magnetorheological finishing (MRF),” Ph.D. dissertation (The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, 2007).
  10. J. E. DeGroote, A. E. Marino, J. P. Wilson, A. L. Bishop, J. C. Lambropoulos, and S. D. Jacobs, “Removal rate model for magnetorheological finishing of glass,” Appl. Opt. 46, 7927-7941 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. C. Miao, S. N. Shafrir, H. J. Romanofsky, J. Mici, J. C. Lambropoulos, and S. D. Jacbos, “Frictional investigation for magnetorheological finishing (mrf) of optical ceramcis and hard metals,” in Optical Fabrication and Testing, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2008), paper OThB4.
  12. J. C. Lambropoulos, S. D. Jacobs, and J. Ruckman, “Material removal mechanisms from grinding to polishing,” Ceramic Trans. 102, 113-128 (1999).
  13. A. G. Evans, “Fracture toughness: The role of indentation techniques,” in Fracture Mechanics Applied to Brittle Materials, S. W. Fierman, ed. (American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979), Vol. 678, pp. 112-135. [CrossRef]
  14. Zygo Mark IV xp Interferometer (Zygo Corp., Middlefield, Conn.). This instrument is a 4 in. He-Ne Fizeau interferometer with a wavelength of 632.8 nm. pv for surface flatness and ddp of the spot were measured in micrometers.
  15. Zygo NewView 5000 noncontact white light interferometer, Zygo Corp., Middlefield, Conn. Average microroughness data (pv and rms) were obtained under the following conditions: 20× Mirau objective; 20 μm bipolar scan length; min/mod 5%, unfiltered. This instrument has a lateral resolution of ~1 μm and a vertical resolution of ~0.3 nm.
  16. Single Axis Slim Line Compressive (K9133B21) Force Sensor Measuring System (Kistler Instrument Corp.).
  17. Single Axis Slim Line Shear (K9143B21) Force Sensor Measuring System (Kistler Instrument Corp.).
  18. Labview (National Instruments Corporation, Austin, Texas). The Labview interface was written by S. Russell and S. N. Shafrir (2008, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York).
  19. “MetroPro Reference Guide” (Zygo Corporation).
  20. M. Schinhaerl, C. Vogt, A. Geiss, R. Stamp, P. Sperber, L. Smith, and R. Rascher, “Forces acting between polishing tool and workpiece surface in magnetorheological finishing,” Proc. SPIE 7060, 706006 (2008).
  21. B. Bhushan and B. K. Gupta, “Friction, wear, and lubrication,” Handbook of Triboloty: Materials, Coatings, and Surface Treatments (Krieger, 1997), Chap. 2, p. 2.11, Table 2.
  22. J. M. Steigerwald, S. P. Murarka, and R. J. Gutmann, Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials (Wiley, 1997). [CrossRef]
  23. J. C. Lambropoulos, Su Xu, and Tong Fang, “Loose abrasive lapping hardness of optical glasses and its interpretation,” Appl. Opt. 36, 1501-1516 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. T. S. Izumitani, “Polishing rate of optical glass,” in Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop Digest (Optical Society of America, 1982), pp. 1-4.
  25. T. S. Izumitani, “Polishing mechanism of fused silica glass,” in Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop Diegest (Optical Society of America, 1984), pp. TuB-A1-1-TuB-A1-3.
  26. M. J. Cumbo, “Chemo-mechanical interactions in optical polishing,” Doctor of Philosophy, Ph.D. dissertation (The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, 1993).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited