OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 48, Iss. 30 — Oct. 20, 2009
  • pp: 5793–5801

Photometric model of diffuse surfaces described as a distribution of interfaced Lambertian facets

Lionel Simonot  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 48, Issue 30, pp. 5793-5801 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.005793


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (421 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The Lambertian model for diffuse reflection is widely used for the sake of its simplicity. Nevertheless, this model is known to be inaccurate in describing a lot of real-world objects, including those that present a matte surface. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a photometric model where the surfaces are described as a distribution of facets where each facet consists of a flat interface on a Lambertian background. Compared to the Lambertian model, it includes two additional physical parameters: an interface roughness parameter and the ratio between the refractive indices of the background binder and of the upper medium. The Torrance–Sparrow model—distribution of strictly specular facets—and the Oren–Nayar model—distribution of strictly Lambertian facets—appear as special cases.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.5240) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Photometry
(240.5770) Optics at surfaces : Roughness
(290.1990) Scattering : Diffusion
(330.1690) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color
(290.1483) Scattering : BSDF, BRDF, and BTDF

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: July 24, 2009
Revised Manuscript: September 15, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: September 21, 2009
Published: October 15, 2009

Citation
Lionel Simonot, "Photometric model of diffuse surfaces described as a distribution of interfaced Lambertian facets," Appl. Opt. 48, 5793-5801 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-48-30-5793


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. H. Lambert, Photometria Sive de Mensure de Gratibus Luminis, Colorum Umbrae (Eberhard Klett, 1760).
  2. M. Oren and S. K. Nayar, “Generalization of the Lambertian model and implications for machine vision,” Int. J. Comput. Vis. 14, 227-251 (1995). [CrossRef]
  3. K. E. Torrance and E. M. Sparrow, “Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1105-1114 (1967). [CrossRef]
  4. L. B. Wolff, “Diffuse-reflectance model for smooth dielectric surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2956-2968 (1994). [CrossRef]
  5. H. Ragheb and E. R. Hancock, “Surface radiance correction for shape shading,” Pattern Recogn. 38, 1574-1595 (2005). [CrossRef]
  6. L. Simonot, M. Hébert, and R. Hersch, “Extension of the Williams-Clapper model to stacked nondiffusing colored layers with different refractive indices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1432-1441 (2006). [CrossRef]
  7. L. Simonot and G. Obein, “Geometrical considerations in analyzing isotropic or anisotropic surface reflections,” Appl. Opt. 46, 2615-2623 (2007). [CrossRef]
  8. F. E. Nicodemus, J. C. Richmond, J. J. Hsia, I. W. Ginsber, and T. Limperis, “Geometrical consideration and nomenclature for reflectance,” Natl. Bur. Stand. Monogr. 160, 1-52 (1977).
  9. W. R. McCluney, Introduction to Radiometry and Photometry (Artech, 1994).
  10. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principle of Optics, 7th ed. (Pergamon, 1999).
  11. D. B. Judd, “Fresnel Reflection of Diffusely Incident Light,” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 29, 329-332 (1942).
  12. M. Hébert and R. D. Hersch, “Classical print reflection models: a radiometric approach,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 48, 363-374 (2004).
  13. M. Elias, L. Simonot, and M. Menu, “Bidirectional reflectance of a diffuse background covered by a partly absorbing layer,” Opt. Commun. 191, 1-7 (2001). [CrossRef]
  14. J. L. Saunderson, “Calculation of the color pigmented plastics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 32, 727-729 (1942). [CrossRef]
  15. C. Bruegge, N. Chrien, and D. Haner, “A spectralon BRF data base for MISR calibration applications,” Remote Sens. Environ. 77, 354-366 (2001). [CrossRef]
  16. D. Haner, B. McGuckin, and C. Bruegge, “Polarization characteristics of spectralon illuminated by coherent light,” Appl. Opt. 38, 6350-6356 (1999). [CrossRef]
  17. G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed. (Wiley Interscience, 1982).
  18. Commission of Illumination, “Colorimetry,” 3rd ed., Tech. Rep. CIE 15:2004 (CIE, 2004).
  19. L. Simonot and M. Elias, “Color change due to surface state modification,” Color Res. Appl. 28, 45-49 (2003). [CrossRef]
  20. L. Simonot and M. Elias, “Color change due to a varnish layer,” Color Res. Appl. 29, 196-204 (2004). [CrossRef]
  21. M. Elias and L. Simonot, “Bi-directional reflectance of a varnished painting Part 1: influence of the refractive indices without using the approximations of Saunderson correction--exact computation,” Opt. Commun. 231, 17-24 (2004). [CrossRef]
  22. M. Elias, L. Simonot, M. Thoury, J. M. Frigerio, “Bi-directional reflectance of a varnished painting Part 2: comparison between the effects of the refractive indices of the surface states and of the absorption of the varnish--experiments and simulations,” Opt. Commun. 231, 25-33 (2004). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited