OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 49, Iss. 7 — Mar. 1, 2010
  • pp: 1139–1150

Smart agile lens remote optical sensor for three-dimensional object shape measurements

Nabeel A. Riza and Syed Azer Reza  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 49, Issue 7, pp. 1139-1150 (2010)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (972 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We demonstrate what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first electronically controlled variable focus lens (ECVFL)-based sensor for remote object shape sensing. Using a target illuminating laser, the axial depths of the shape features on a given object are measured by observing the intensity profile of the optical beam falling on the object surface and tuning the ECVFL focal length to form a minimum beam spot. Using a lens focal length control calibration table, the object feature depths are computed. Transverse measurement of the dimensions of each object feature is done using a surface-flooding technique that completely illuminates a given feature. Alternately, transverse measurements can also be made by the variable spatial sampling scan technique, where, depending upon the feature sizes, the spatial sampling spot beam size is controlled using the ECVFL. A proof-of-concept sensor is demonstrated using an optical beam from a laser source operating at a power of 10 mW and a wavelength of 633 nm . A three-dimensional (3D) test object constructed from LEGO building blocks forms has three mini-skyscraper structures labeled A, B, and C. The ( x , y , z ) dimensions for A, B, and C are ( 8 mm , 8 mm , 124.84 mm ), ( 24.2 mm , 24.2 mm , 38.5 mm ), and ( 15.86 mm , 15.86 mm , 86.74 mm ), respectively. The smart sensor experimentally measured ( x , y , z ) dimensions for A, B, C are ( 7.95 mm , 7.95 mm , 120 mm ), ( 24.1 mm , 24.1 mm , 37 mm ), and ( 15.8 mm , 15.8 mm , 85 mm ), respectively. The average shape sensor transverse measurement percentage errors for A, B, and C are ± 0.625 % , ± 0.41 % , and ± 0.38 % , respectively. The average shape sensor axial measurement percentage errors for A, B, and C are ± 4.03 % , ± 3.9 % , and ± 2.01 % , respectively. Applications for the proposed shape sensor include machine parts inspection, 3D object reconstruction, and animation

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.4820) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optical systems
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors
(280.4788) Remote sensing and sensors : Optical sensing and sensors

ToC Category:
Remote Sensing and Sensors

Original Manuscript: November 25, 2009
Revised Manuscript: January 19, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: January 22, 2010
Published: February 24, 2010

Nabeel A. Riza and Syed Azer Reza, "Smart agile lens remote optical sensor for three-dimensional object shape measurements," Appl. Opt. 49, 1139-1150 (2010)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. F. Chen, G. M. Brown, and M. Song, “Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods,” Opt. Eng. 39, 10-22 (2000). [CrossRef]
  2. P. J. Besl, “Active optical range imaging sensors,” in Machine Vision and Applications (Springer, 1988), Vol. 1, pp. 127-152. [CrossRef]
  3. H. J. Tiziani and H. M. Uhde, “Three-dimensional image sensing by chromatic confocal microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 33, 1838-1843 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. N. A. Riza and Y. Huang, “High speed optical scanner for multi-dimensional beam pointing and acquisition,” in Lasers and Electro-Optics Society 12th Annual Conference Proceedings, L. Goldberg, ed. (IEEE, 1999), pp. 184-185.
  5. N. A. Riza, “Multiplexed optical scanner technology,” U.S. patent 6,687,036 (3 Feb. 2004).
  6. S. D. Cochran and G. Medioni, “3-D surface description from binocular stereo,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 14, 981-994 (1992). [CrossRef]
  7. G. Häusler and D. Ritter, “Parallel three-dimensional sensing by color-coded triangulation,” Appl. Opt. 32, 7164-7169(1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. K. D. Moore, “Intercalibration method for underwater three-dimensional mapping laser line scan systems,” Appl. Opt. 40, 5991-6004 (2001). [CrossRef]
  9. X. X. Cheng, X. Y. Su, and L. R. Guo, “Automated measurement method for 360° profilometry of 3-D diffuse objects,” Appl. Opt. 30, 1274-1278 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. C. Reich, R. Ritter, and J. Thesing, “3-D shape measurement of complex objects by combining photogrammetry and fringe projection,” Opt. Eng. 39, 224-231 (2000). [CrossRef]
  11. H. Takasaki, “Moiré topology,” Appl. Opt. 9, 1467-1472 (1970). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. S. Wei, S. Wu, I. Kao, and F. P Chiang, “Measurement of wafer surface using shadow moiré technique with Talbot effect,” J. Electron. Packag. 120, 166-170 (1998). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Anand, V. Chhaniwal, P. Almoro, G. Pedrini, and W. Osten, “Shape and deformation measurements of 3D objects using volume speckle field and phase retrieval,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1522-1523 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Leica Geosystems HDS 3000 3-D Laser Scanner System 2009 Data Sheet.
  15. A. J. Makynen, J. T. Kostamovaara, and R. A. Myllyla, “A high-resolution lateral displacement sensing method using active illumination of a cooperative target and a focused four-quadrant position-sensitive detector,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 44, 46-52 (1995). [CrossRef]
  16. B. Nilsson and T. E. Carlsson, “Direct three-dimensional shape measurement by digital light-in-flight holography,” Appl. Opt. 37, 7954-7959 (1998). [CrossRef]
  17. C. Wagner, W. Osten, and S. Seebacher, “Direct shape measurement by digital wavefront reconstruction and multiwavelength contouring,” Opt. Eng. 39, 79-85 (2000). [CrossRef]
  18. N. A. Riza, “Digital control polarization-based optical scanner,” U.S. patent 6,031,658 (29 Feb. 2000).
  19. S. A. Khan and N. A. Riza, “Confocal microscopy based agile optical endoscope using liquid crystals,” in IEEE LEOS Biophotonics Summer Topical Meeting Digest (IEEE, 2004), pp. 10-11. [CrossRef]
  20. N. A. Riza and S. A. Reza, “Non-contact distance sensor using spatial signal processing,” Opt. Lett. 34, 434-436(2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. N. A. Riza and F. Perez, patent pending.
  22. H. Kogelnik and T. Li, “Laser beams and resonators,” Appl. Opt. 5, 1550-1567 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. E. Friedman and J. L. Miller, Photonics Rules of Thumb: Optics, Electro-Optics, Fiber Optics, and Lasers, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2004), p. 170.
  24. L. Saurei, J. Peseux, F. Laune, and B. Berge, “Tunable liquid lens based on electrowetting technology: principle, properties and applications,” in 10th Annual Micro-optics Conference (Elsevier, 2004), p. E-1.
  25. Model Arctic 320 liquid lens technical datasheet: optical and opto-mechanical data (Varioptic SA, 2006), pp. 1-7.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited