OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 50, Iss. 9 — Mar. 20, 2011
  • pp: 1220–1226

Research on reducing the edge effect in magnetorheological finishing

Hao Hu, Yifan Dai, Xiaoqiang Peng, and Jianmin Wang  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 50, Issue 9, pp. 1220-1226 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.001220


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1660 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The edge effect could not be avoided in most optical manufacturing methods based on the theory of computer controlled optical surfacing. The difference between the removal function at the workpiece edge and that inside it is also the primary cause for edge effect in magnetorheological finishing (MRF). The change of physical dimension and removal ratio of the removal function is investigated through experiments. The results demonstrate that the situation is different when MRF “spot” is at the leading edge or at the trailing edge. Two methods for reducing the edge effect are put into practice after analysis of the processing results. One is adopting a small removal function for dealing with the workpiece edge, and the other is utilizing the removal function compensation. The actual processing results show that these two ways are both effective on reducing the edge effect in MRF.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(220.0220) Optical design and fabrication : Optical design and fabrication
(220.4610) Optical design and fabrication : Optical fabrication
(220.5450) Optical design and fabrication : Polishing

ToC Category:
Optical Design and Fabrication

History
Original Manuscript: November 24, 2010
Revised Manuscript: January 17, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: January 17, 2011
Published: March 10, 2011

Citation
Hao Hu, Yifan Dai, Xiaoqiang Peng, and Jianmin Wang, "Research on reducing the edge effect in magnetorheological finishing," Appl. Opt. 50, 1220-1226 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-50-9-1220


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. D. Jacobs, W. I. Kordonski, I. V. Prokhorov, D. Golini, G. R. Gorodkin, and T. D. Strafford, “Deterministic magnetorheological finishing,” U.S. patent 5,795,212 (18 August 1998).
  2. D. Golini, W. I. Kordonski, P. Dumas, and S. Hogan, “Magnetorheological finishing (MRF) in commercial precision optics manufacturing,” Proc. SPIE 3782, 80–91 (1999). [CrossRef]
  3. P. Guo, H. Fang, and J. Yu, “Edge effect in fluid jet polishing,” Appl. Opt. 45, 6729–6735 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. Cordero-Dávila, J. González-García, M. Pedrayes-López, L. A. Aguilar-Chiu, J. Cuautle-Cortés, and C. Robledo-Sánchez, “Edge effects with the Preston equation for a circular tool and workpiece,” Appl. Opt. 43, 1250–1254 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. Shorey, A. Jones, P. Dumas, and M. Tricard, “Improved edge performance in magnetorheological finishing (MRF)” (QED Technologies, Inc.), http://optics.nasa.gov/tech_days/tech_days_2004/docs/17%20Aug%202004/15%20QED%20Edge%20Effects.pdf.
  6. A. B. Shorey, “Mechanisms of material removal in magnetorheological finishing (MRF) of glass,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Rochester, 2000).
  7. D. W. Kim, W. H. Park, S. W. Kim, and J. H. Burge, “Parametric modeling of edge effects for polishing tool influence functions,” Opt. Express 17, 5656–5665 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. M. Schinhaerl, G. Smith, R. Stamp, R. Rascher, L. Smith, E. Pitschke, P. Sperber, and Andreas Geiss, “Mathematical modelling of influence functions in computer-controlled polishing,” Appl. Math. Model. 32, 2888–2924 (2008). [CrossRef]
  9. H. Hao, P. Xiaoqiang, D. Yifan, and S. Feng, “Algorithm and implementation of magnetorheological finishing with spiral scan mode,” J. Natl. Univ. Defense Technol. 31, 5–9 (2009) (in Chinese).
  10. Hao Hu, Y. Dai, and X. Peng, “Restraint of tool path ripple based on surface error distribution and process parameters in deterministic finishing,” Opt. Express 18, 22973–22981(2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited