OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 51, Iss. 29 — Oct. 10, 2012
  • pp: 7103–7114

Relationship between the charge-coupled device signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range with respect to the analog gain

Dejiang Wang, Tao Zhang, and Haipeng Kuang  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 51, Issue 29, pp. 7103-7114 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.007103


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1472 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The signal-to-noise ratio and the dynamic range are the two key parameters characterizing CCD performance, especially in remote sensing applications. After exploring the possible sources of CCD noise, this paper analyzes the impacts of the analog gain on the two parameters, respectively, and establishes the mathematical models describing their relationships. Then the platforms including the CCD radiometric calibration and imaging in practice are constructed to test the proposed models based on two situations, considering the influence of the quantization noise. Finally, the design trade-off between the signal-to-noise ratio and the dynamic range is presented, such that the CCD signal-to-noise ratio will be improved as much as possible, while the dynamic range degradation becomes acceptable.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.1520) Detectors : CCD, charge-coupled device
(100.2980) Image processing : Image enhancement
(110.4280) Imaging systems : Noise in imaging systems
(010.0280) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Remote sensing and sensors

ToC Category:
Detectors

History
Original Manuscript: August 10, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: September 6, 2012
Published: October 10, 2012

Citation
Dejiang Wang, Tao Zhang, and Haipeng Kuang, "Relationship between the charge-coupled device signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range with respect to the analog gain," Appl. Opt. 51, 7103-7114 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-51-29-7103


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. R. Janesick, Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices (SPIE Press, 2001).
  2. G. C. Holst, CMOS/CCD Sensor and Camera Systems (SPIE Press, 2007).
  3. M. Iyenqar and D. Lange, “The Goodrich 3rd generation DB-110 system: operational on tactical and unmanned aircraft,” Proc. SPIE 6209, 620909 (2006). [CrossRef]
  4. R. D. Fiete and T. Tantalo, “Comparison of SNR image quality metrics for remote sensing systems,” Opt. Eng. 40, 574–585 (2001). [CrossRef]
  5. N. J. Miller, M. P. Dierking, and B. D. Duncan, “Optical sparse aperture imaging,” Appl. Opt. 46, 5933–5943 (2007). [CrossRef]
  6. S. L. Smith, J. Mooney, T. Tantalo, and R. D. Fiete, “Understanding image quality losses due to smear in high-resolution remote sensing imaging systems,” Opt. Eng. 38, 821–826 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. D. J. Wang, T. Zhang, and H. P. Kuang, “Clocking smearing analysis and reduction for multi phase TDI CCD in remote sensing system,” Opt. Express 19, 4868–4880 (2011). [CrossRef]
  8. A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing (Prentice Hall, 2009).
  9. F. Devaux, J. L. Blanchet, and E. Lantz, “Effective signal-to-noise ratio improvement by parametric image amplification,” Opt. Lett. 32, 175–177 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. R. H. Kingston, Detection of Optical and Infrared Radiation (Springer-Verlag, 1978).
  11. G. C. Holst, CCD Arrays, Cameras, and Displays (SPIE Press, 1998).
  12. P. X. Silveira and R. Narayanswamy, “Signal-to-noise analysis of task-based imaging systems with defocus,” Appl. Opt. 45, 2924–2934 (2006). [CrossRef]
  13. L. F. Chen, X. S. Zhang, J. M. Lin, and D. G. Sha, “Signal-to-noise evaluation of a CCD camera,” Opt. Laser Technol. 41, 574–579 (2009). [CrossRef]
  14. G. E. Healey and R. Kondepudy, “Radiometric CCD camera calibration and noise estimation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 16, 267–276 (1994). [CrossRef]
  15. G. Zonios, “Noise and stray light characterization of a compact CCD spectrophotometer used in biomedical applications,” Appl. Opt. 49, 163–169 (2010). [CrossRef]
  16. K. Irie, A. E. Mckinnon, K. Unsworth, and I. M. Woodhead, “A technique for evaluation of CCD video camera noise,” IEEE Trans. Circuit Syst. Video Technol. 18, 280–284(2008). [CrossRef]
  17. D. J. Wang and T. Zhang, “Noise analysis and measurement of time delay and integration charge coupled device,” Chin. Phys. B 20, 1–6 (2011). [CrossRef]
  18. G. C. Holst, Electro-Optical Imaging System Performance (SPIE Press, 2008).
  19. G. C. Holst, “Imaging system performance based upon Fλ/d,” Opt. Eng. 46, 103204 (2007). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited