OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 51, Iss. 31 — Nov. 1, 2012
  • pp: 7668–7673

Target acquisition performance in a cluttered environment

Qian Li, Cui Yang, and Jian-Qi Zhang  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 51, Issue 31, pp. 7668-7673 (2012)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (511 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Most existing target acquisition (TA) models neglect the influence of background clutter, which results in inaccurate prediction of TA performance in a complicated environment. In this paper, all the background clutter is first quantitatively characterized by the distribution of edge clutter metric, and its effects on the target detection probability are analyzed. Further, a novel TA model is developed by combining this proposed clutter metric and the target task performance metric based on probability statistics theory. Moreover, this proposed model is validated by the search_2 dataset, and experiment results show that it is more consistent with the subjective detection probability than other models.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.1880) Detectors : Detection
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(100.2960) Image processing : Image analysis
(110.2970) Imaging systems : Image detection systems

ToC Category:
Imaging Systems

Original Manuscript: March 7, 2012
Revised Manuscript: September 30, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 12, 2012
Published: October 30, 2012

Qian Li, Cui Yang, and Jian-Qi Zhang, "Target acquisition performance in a cluttered environment," Appl. Opt. 51, 7668-7673 (2012)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. B. D. Vaughan, “Soldier-in-the-loop target acquisition performance prediction through 2001: integration of perceptual and cognitive models,” Army Resrach Lab Technical Report ARL-TR-3883 (Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 2006).
  2. L. B. Scott and J. A. D’Agostino, “NVEOD FLIR’92 thermal imaging systems performance model,” Proc. SPIE 1689, 194–203 (1992). [CrossRef]
  3. W. Wittenstein, “Thermal range model TRM3,” Proc. SPIE 3436, 413–424 (1998). [CrossRef]
  4. Night Vision Thermal Imaging Systems Performance Model (U.S. Army Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, 2001).
  5. P. Bijl and J. M. Valeton, “TOD: a new method to characterize electro-optical system performance,” Proc. SPIE 3377, 182–193 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. T. C. Edwards, R. H. Vollmerhausen, and R. G. Drigger, “NVESD time-limited search model,” Proc. SPIE 5076, 53–59 (2003). [CrossRef]
  7. R. H. Vollmerhausen, E. Jacobs, and R. G. Driggers, “New metric for predicting target acquisition performance,” Opt. Eng. 43, 2806–2818 (2004).
  8. R. H. Vollmerhausen and E. Jacobs, “The targeting task performance (TTP) metric: a new model for predicting target acquisition performance,” Technical Report AMSEL-NV-TR-230 (Modeling and Simulation Division, Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, U. S. Army CERDEC, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 2004).
  9. R. K. Moore, H. A. Camp, S. Moyer, and C. E. Halford, “Masked target transform volume clutter metric applied to vehicle search,” Proc. SPIE 7662, 76620M (2010). [CrossRef]
  10. H. A. Camp, S. Moyer, and R. K. Moore, “Comparing masked target transform volume (MTTV) clutter metric to human observer evaluation of visual clutter,” Proc. SPIE 7662, 76620A (2010). [CrossRef]
  11. D. E. Schmieder and M. R. Weathersby, “Detection performance in clutter with variable resolution,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 19, 622–630 (1983). [CrossRef]
  12. T. Meitzler, G. Gerhart, and H. Singh, “A relative clutter metric,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 34, 968–976 (1998). [CrossRef]
  13. C. Yang, J.-Q. Zhang, and X. Xu, “Quaternion phase-correlation-based clutter metric for color images,” Opt. Eng. 46, 127008 (2007). [CrossRef]
  14. H. Chang and J. Zhang, “New metrics for clutter affecting human target acquisition,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 42, 361–368 (2006). [CrossRef]
  15. C. Yang, J. Wu, Q. Li, and J.-Q. Zhang, “Sparse-representation-based clutter metric,” Appl. Opt. 50, 1601–1605 (2011). [CrossRef]
  16. Q. Li, J.-Q. Zhang, and C. Yang, “Structure of edge background clutter metric,” J. Xidian Univ. 39, 95–99 (2012).
  17. P. Bijl and M. A. Hogervorst, “NVThermIP vs TOD: matching the target acquisition range criteria,” Proc. SPIE 6543, 65430C (2007). [CrossRef]
  18. R. H. Vollmerhausen and A. L. Robinson, “Modeling target acquisition tasks associated with security and surveillance,” Appl. Opt. 46, 4209–4221 (2007). [CrossRef]
  19. R. H. Vollmerhausen, S. Moyer, K. Krapels, R. G. Driggers, J. G. Hixson, and A. L. Robinson, “Predicting the probability of facial identification using a specific object model,” Appl. Opt. 47, 751–759 (2008). [CrossRef]
  20. P. G. J. Barten, Contrast Sensitivity of the Human Eye and its Effects on Image Quality (SPIE, 1999).
  21. A. Toet, P. Bijl, and J. M. Valeton, “Image dataset for testing search and detection models,” Opt. Eng. 40, 1760–1767 (2001). [CrossRef]
  22. A. Toet, P. Bijl, F. L. Kooi, and J. M. Valeton, “A high-resolution image data set for testing search and detection models,” Report TM-98-A020 (TNO Human Factors Research Institute, 1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited