OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 52, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 2013
  • pp: 8154–8160

Cavity length measurement: bias from misalignment and mismatching

Robert D. Reasenberg  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 52, Issue 33, pp. 8154-8160 (2013)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (177 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



SR-POEM, the sounding rocket principle of equivalence measurement, uses a set of six tracking-frequency laser gauges operating in Fabry–Perot cavities to determine the relative acceleration of two test masses (TMs) that are chemically different. One end of each cavity is a flat mirror on a TM; the other end is a concave coupling mirror mounted to a common reference plate. The tracking-frequency laser gauges work by locking a variable frequency laser to the cavity by the method of Pound, Drever, and Hall. Because the TMs are unconstrained, they are expected to rotate slightly during measurement. Although the distance measurements are intended to be based on the TEM00 cavity mode, any misalignment will couple into higher-order transverse modes, particularly the TEM10 and TEM01. Light thus coupled will contribute a spurious signal to the cavity locking servo that causes a bias (i.e., a systematic error) in the length determination. The spurious signal proportional to the misalignment has an antisymmetric distribution at the detector and thus has a zero average, but causes a distance bias because of the inhomogeneity of the detector responsivity. To prevent such bias, SR-POEM includes a servo to keep the incoming laser beam aligned with the cavity. The required performance of that alignment servo is less stringent than has already been achieved by other projects. There is also a spurious signal proportional to the square of the misalignment that produces a symmetric distribution at the detector. This signal is also made unimportant by the operation of an alignment servo, even when operating well above the shot noise limit. We also look at the locking of a laser to a high finesse cavity and conclude that the alignment quality sets a bound on the ratio of measurement accuracy to cavity linewidth.

OCIS Codes
(120.2230) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Fabry-Perot
(120.3940) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Metrology
(140.0140) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers and laser optics
(120.6085) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Space instrumentation

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

Original Manuscript: July 31, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 22, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 22, 2013
Published: November 20, 2013

Robert D. Reasenberg, "Cavity length measurement: bias from misalignment and mismatching," Appl. Opt. 52, 8154-8160 (2013)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. R. D. Reasenberg, B. R. Patla, J. D. Phillips, and R. Thapa, “Design and characteristics of a WEP test in a sounding-rocket payload,” Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 184013 (2012). [CrossRef]
  2. R. Thapa, J. D. Phillips, E. Rocco, and R. D. Reasenberg, “Subpicometer length measurement using semiconductor laser tracking frequency gauge,” Opt. Lett. 36, 3759–3761 (2011). [CrossRef]
  3. J. D. Phillips and R. D. Reasenberg, “Semiconductor laser tracking frequency distance gauge,” Proc. SPIE 7436, 74360T (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. S. Schlamminger, K.-Y. Choi, T. A. Wagner, J. H. Gundlach, and E. G. Adelberger, “Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 041101 (2008). [CrossRef]
  5. T. A. Wagner, S. Schlamminger, J. H. Gundlachand, and E. G. Adelberger, “Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle,” Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 184002 (2012). [CrossRef]
  6. N. A. Robertson, J. R. Blackwood, S. Buchman, R. L. Byer, J. Camp, D. Gill, J. Hanson, S. Williams, and P. Zhou, “Kelvin probe measurements: investigations of the patch effect with applications to ST-7 and LISA,” Class. Quantum Grav. 23, 2665–2680 (2006). [CrossRef]
  7. R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley, and H. Ward, “Laser phase, and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator,” Appl. Phys. B 31, 97–105 (1983). [CrossRef]
  8. D. Z. Anderson, “Alignment of resonant optical cavities,” Appl. Opt. 23, 2944–2949 (1984). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Yariv, Introduction to Optical Electronics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976).
  10. T. C. Larason and S. S. Bruce, “Spatial uniformity of responsivity for silicon, gallium nitride, germanium, and indium gallium arsenide photodiodes,” Metrologia 35, 491–496 (1998). [CrossRef]
  11. N. M. Sampasand and D. Z. Anderson, “Stabilization of laser beam alignment to an optical resonator by heterodyne detection of off-axis modes,” Appl. Opt. 29, 394–403 (1990). [CrossRef]
  12. D. Babusci, H. Fang, G. Giordano, G. Matone, L. Matone, and V. Sannibale, “Alignment procedure for the VIRGO interferometer: experimental results from the Frascati prototype,” Phys. Lett. A 226, 31–40 (1997). [CrossRef]
  13. R. D. Reasenberg, “Aligning a reflection cavity by Anderson’s method,” Appl. Opt. 51, 3132–3136 (2012). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited