OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Editor: Joseph N. Mait
  • Vol. 53, Iss. 24 — Aug. 20, 2014
  • pp: 5460–5464

Measuring very low optical powers with a common camera

Silviu T. Popescu, Petronela S. Gheorghe, and Adrian Petris  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 53, Issue 24, pp. 5460-5464 (2014)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (498 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We introduce a procedure to calibrate an inexpensive, commercial camera for optical power measurements. This allows the use of the camera as a very sensitive optical power meter that is able to measure powers down to the femtowatt level. A windowing technique, based on the selection of a region of interest from the total sensor area, is used to maintain a good signal-to-noise ratio over a large range of the measured optical powers. The increase of the exposure time of the camera shifts its detection limit to lower powers. Using this calibration procedure and the windowing technique, we measured 25 fW of optical power with a common complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor camera.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.0040) Detectors : Detectors
(040.1490) Detectors : Cameras
(120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology

ToC Category:

Original Manuscript: June 19, 2014
Revised Manuscript: July 14, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: July 18, 2014
Published: August 15, 2014

Silviu T. Popescu, Petronela S. Gheorghe, and Adrian Petris, "Measuring very low optical powers with a common camera," Appl. Opt. 53, 5460-5464 (2014)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. S. Cova, M. Ghioni, A. Lacaita, C. Samori, and F. Zappa, “Avalanche photodiodes and quenching circuits for single-photon detection,” Appl. Opt. 35, 1956–1976 (1996). [CrossRef]
  2. J. M. Roth, T. E. Murphy, and C. Xu, “Ultrasensitive and high-dynamic-range two-photon absorption in a GaAs photomultiplier tube,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2076–2078 (2002). [CrossRef]
  3. D. Renker, “Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes, history, properties and problems,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 567, 48–56 (2006). [CrossRef]
  4. J. Janesick, J. Pinter, R. Potter, T. Elliot, J. Andrews, J. Tower, J. Cheng, and J. Bishop, “Fundamental performance differences between CMOS and CCD imagers: part III,” Proc. SPIE 7439, 743907 (2009). [CrossRef]
  5. L. Blockstein and O. Yadid-Pecht, “Crosstalk quantification, analysis, and trends in CMOS image sensors,” Appl. Opt. 49, 4483–4488 (2010). [CrossRef]
  6. J. Joubert, Y. Sabharwal, and D. Sharma, “Digital camera technologies for scientific bio-imaging part 2: sampling and signal,” Microsc. Anal. 26, S4–S8 (2012).
  7. Thorlabs DCC1545M CMOS Camera Operation Manual, http://www.thorlabs.de/thorcat/25000/DCC1545M-Manual.pdf .

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited