OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 13, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 1974
  • pp: 2609–2613

Optimum Adaptive Imaging Through Atmospheric Turbulence

Jeffrey H. Shapiro  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 13, Issue 11, pp. 2609-2613 (1974)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.13.002609


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (567 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Recent results for the atmospheric mode decomposition are applied to an idealized imaging problem in which the receiver has a priori knowledge of the channel impulse response and mode decomposition. It is shown that a channel-matched filter receiver is essentially optimum and, on the average, achieves diffraction-limited performance. Furthermore, when the transmitting aperture lies within a single isoplanatic patch, this system may be realized without a priori channel knowledge by transmitted reference techniques.

© 1974 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: February 4, 1974
Published: November 1, 1974

Citation
Jeffrey H. Shapiro, "Optimum Adaptive Imaging Through Atmospheric Turbulence," Appl. Opt. 13, 2609-2613 (1974)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-13-11-2609


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. H. Shapiro, Appl. Opt. 13, 2714 (1974).
  2. The far-field case is not of interest here, because in the far field the transmitter appears to the receiver as an unresolved point source.
  3. C. K. Rushforth, R. W. Harris, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 539 (1968). [CrossRef]
  4. G. Toraldo di Francia, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 799 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. J. D. Gaskill, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 600 (1968). [CrossRef]
  6. H. T. Yura, Appl. Opt. 12, 1188 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Because∑m=1∞ηm=∫R2dr¯′∫R1dr¯|h21(r¯′,r¯)|2,we have∑m=1∞ηm<∞,with probability 1, when both apertures have finite diameters.
  8. H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I (Wiley, New York, 1968), pp. 34–36.
  9. Ref. 8, pp. 68–69.
  10. We should note, however, that there are special circumstances under which we may reliably estimate em for m > Df for atmospheric propagation, or m > Dfo for free-space propagation, e.g., if we have a priori information that em is such that No/ηmem2 ≪ 1, despite ηm being very small. For free-space imaging, this leads to studies of analytic continuation and/or extrapolation using the prolate spheroidal wave functions. In this paper we assume no a priori knowledge of Ei, and hence we discount the possibility of reliably estimating mode-amplitudes associated with very small eigenvalues.
  11. C. W. Helstrom, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 297 (1967). [CrossRef]
  12. J. L. Horner, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 553 (1969). [CrossRef]
  13. J. M. Wozencraft, I. M. Jacobs, Principles of Communication Engineering (Wiley, New York, 1965), pp. 239–244.
  14. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), p. 80.
  15. B. L. McGlammery, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 293 (1967). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited