OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 19, Iss. 4 — Feb. 15, 1980
  • pp: 561–573

Ellipsometry of rough surfaces

T. V. Vorburger and K. C. Ludema  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 561-573 (1980)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.19.000561


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1686 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Ellipsometry measurements on several different kinds of rough surfaces were compared with stylus measurements of the surface texture. For steeply sloped periodic surfaces, the ellipsometric angles Δ and ψ varied rapidly as the angle of incidence was varied near a diffraction minimum. This effect is interpreted in terms of the Kirchhoff theory and is ascribed to interference between singly and doubly reflected light waves. For a set of Ni replicas of machined surfaces with random surface profiles, Δ and ψ varied systematically with surface texture. These variations persisted even after the surface composition was changed by evaporating first Al then Au on the surfaces. The systematic effects due to surface roughness are in disagreement with those of a previous experiment and are not readily explainable in terms of the Kirchhoff theory. The possible reasons for this are discussed along with the prospects for using ellipsometry as a tool for measuring surface roughness.

© 1980 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: August 31, 1979
Published: February 15, 1980

Citation
T. V. Vorburger and K. C. Ludema, "Ellipsometry of rough surfaces," Appl. Opt. 19, 561-573 (1980)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-19-4-561


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. For an extensive review of the subject see R. M. A. Azzam, N. M. Bashara, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).
  2. F. L. McCrackin, E. Passaglia, R. R. Stromberg, H. L. Steinberg, J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. Sect. A: 67, 363 (1963). [CrossRef]
  3. R. J. Archer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 970 (1962). [CrossRef]
  4. Ref. 1, Chap. 4.
  5. J. Kruger, P. C. S. Hayfield, in Handbook on Corrosion Testing and Evaluation, W. H. Ailor, Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1971), p. 783.
  6. Ref. 1, p. 419.
  7. K. Vedam, Surf. Sci. 56, 221 (1976). [CrossRef]
  8. F. Meyer, E. E. Kluizenaar, D. den Engelsen, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 529 (1973). [CrossRef]
  9. Y. J. Van der Meulen, N. C. Hien, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 804 (1974). [CrossRef]
  10. H. Yokota, H. Sakata, M. Nishibori, K. Kinosita, Surf. Sci. 16, 265 (1969). [CrossRef]
  11. W. Primak, Surf. Sci. 16, 398 (1969). [CrossRef]
  12. K. Vedam, S. S. So, Surf. Sci. 29, 379 (1972). [CrossRef]
  13. M. M. Ibrahim, N. M. Bashara, Sur. Sci. 30, 632 (1972). [CrossRef]
  14. J. M. Elson, J. M. Bennett, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 31 (1979). [CrossRef]
  15. C. A. Fenstermaker, F. L. McCrackin, Surf. Sci. 16, 85 (1969). [CrossRef]
  16. I. Ohlidal, F. Lukes, Opt. Acta 19, 817 (1972); I. Ohlidal, F. Lukes, K. Navratil, Surf. Sci. 45, 91 (1974). [CrossRef]
  17. F. L. McCrackin, Natl. Bur. Stand. U.S. Tech. Note 479 (1969).
  18. E. L. Church, J. M. Zavada, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 1136A (1976); Appl. Opt. 14, 1788 (1975). [PubMed]
  19. P. Beckmann, A. Spizzichino, The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces (Pergamon, New York, 1963), Chap. 3.
  20. T. Smith, Surf. Sci. 56, 252(1976). [CrossRef]
  21. P. M. Lonardo, Ann. CIRP 23, 189 (1974); P. Chiesorin, P. M. Lonardo, Tech. Pap. Soc. Manuf. Eng. MS77–216 (1977); P. M. Lonardo, Ann. CIRP 27, 531 (1978).
  22. For a discussion of surface roughness parameters see American National Standards Institute B46.1-1978, Surface Texture (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1978), p. 27.
  23. T. Smith, G. Lindberg, Surf. Technol. 8, 1 (1979). [CrossRef]
  24. R. M. A. Azzam, N. M. Bashara, Phys. Rev. B: 58, 4721 (1972). [CrossRef]
  25. A similar system is discussed by detail by E. C. Teague, Natl. Bur. Stand. U.S. Tech. Note 902 (1976).
  26. The present system is discussed briefly by T. V. Vorburger, E. C. Teague, F. E. Scire, Dimensions/NBS 62, 18 (1978).
  27. J. Peklenik, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. London Part 3 182, 108 (1967). [CrossRef]
  28. See, for example, D. J. Whitehouse, J. F. Archard, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A: 316, 97 (1970). [CrossRef]
  29. J. Peklenik, Ann. CIRP 15, 381 (1967).
  30. M. C. Hutley, V. M. Bird, Opt. Acta 20, 771 (1973). [CrossRef]
  31. V. Twersky, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 145 (1962). [CrossRef]
  32. A. Hessel, A. A. Oliner, Appl. Opt. 4, 1275 (1965). [CrossRef]
  33. Ref. 19, Chap. 5.
  34. S. Silver, Microwave Antenna Theory and Design (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949), p. 161.
  35. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975), p. 435.
  36. Ref. 34, p. 74.
  37. Ref. 19, Chap. 4.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited