OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 20, Iss. 11 — Jun. 1, 1981
  • pp: 1959–1966

Visibility of rms slope variations on the sea surface

R. D. Chapman  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 20, Issue 11, pp. 1959-1966 (1981)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1059 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A model relating viewing geometry, sky conditions, and statistical sea surface parameters to the luminance of the sea surface is developed. The model is used to estimate the relative visibility of surface perturbations manifested by a variation in the rms surface slope. These estimates are presented for a variety of geometries in the solar plane using two sky conditions (clear and overcast) and two wind speeds (∼2 and 7 m/sec). The results of this analysis, applicable to a unidirectional radiometer with no temporal averaging, show comparable extrema in the visibility of surface perturbations for both the overcast and clear sky models. The visibility of surface perturbations is shown to be maximized by geometries with either large gradients in the slope-to-luminance transfer functions (within the glitter pattern for the clear sky and near the horizon for both sky models) or very small gradients in the slope-to-luminance transfer functions (90° away from the glitter pattern for the clear sky and nadir directed for the overcast sky). It is shown that improvements in the estimated values of the luminance SNR sensitivity to rms surface slope variations can be obtained through spatial and/or temporal averaging.

© 1981 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: December 15, 1980
Published: June 1, 1981

R. D. Chapman, "Visibility of rms slope variations on the sea surface," Appl. Opt. 20, 1959-1966 (1981)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. E. C. LaFond, in The Sea, Vol. 1, M. N. Hill, Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1962), p. 745.
  2. J. A. Shand, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 34, 899 (1953).
  3. R. S. Dietz, Sea Front. 359 (Nov.–Dec. 1974).
  4. J. R. Apel et al., J. Geophys. Res. 80, No. 6, 865 (20Feb.1975). [CrossRef]
  5. B. A. Hughes, H. L. Grant, J. Geophys. Res. 83, No. C1, 443 (Jan. 1978). [CrossRef]
  6. B. A. Hughes, J. Geophys. Res. 83, No. C1, 455 (Jan.1978). [CrossRef]
  7. C. Cox, W. Munk, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 838 (1954). [CrossRef]
  8. P. M. Saunders, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 4643 (1967). [CrossRef]
  9. R. G. Hopkinson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 455 (1954). [CrossRef]
  10. F. W. Reidel, “Analytical Investigation of a Simplified Model to Study Sun Glitter Temporal Fluctuations,” American Geophysical Union Spring Meeting, Washington, D.C., May 1979.
  11. G. N. Plass et al., Appl. Opt. 14, 1924 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. G. N. Plass et al., Appl. Opt. 15, 3161 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited