OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 20, Iss. 11 — Jun. 1, 1981
  • pp: 2011–2016

Impact of sampled data on an optical joint transform correlator

D. F. Elliott and I. L. Ayala  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 20, Issue 11, pp. 2011-2016 (1981)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.002011


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (760 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Coherent optical systems are well known for performing certain operations such as Fourier and Fresnel transformation and pattern recognition. The basis for pattern recognition in many coherent optical systems is the correlator. This paper discusses the effect of undersampling in an optical joint transform correlator which has a sampled-data input, detectors of size 1 × i resolution elements in the Fourier plane, and detectors of size 1 × 1 resolution elements in the correlation plane, where i is an integer. After the undersampling, it is shown that the correlation plane still contains the needed data, the shape of the correlation surfaces are unchanged, and the different correlation terms just move closer together. It is shown that the penalty for undersampling is that the amount of input data must be reduced by a factor of i. It is also shown that a digital simulation using a discrete Fourier transform gives an accurate prediction of the optical correlator performance. Results from the simulation are given to verify the theory.

© 1981 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: November 19, 1980
Published: June 1, 1981

Citation
D. F. Elliott and I. L. Ayala, "Impact of sampled data on an optical joint transform correlator," Appl. Opt. 20, 2011-2016 (1981)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-20-11-2011


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Vander Lugt, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-10, 139 (1964). [CrossRef]
  2. E. N. Leith, J. Upatnieks, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1123 (1962). [CrossRef]
  3. C. S. Weaver et al., Appl. Opt. 9, 1672 (1970). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. W. Goodman, Proc. IEEE 65, 29 (1977). [CrossRef]
  5. D. Casasent, Proc. IEEE 67, 813 (1979). [CrossRef]
  6. J. Rau, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1490 (1966). [CrossRef]
  7. D. Casasent, A. Furman, Appl. Opt. 17, 3418 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. Casasent, Proc. IEEE 65, 143 (1977). [CrossRef]
  9. L. Flores, D. Hecht, Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 118, 182 (1977).
  10. D. F. Elliott, “Relationships of DFT Filter Shapes,” in Proceedings, Twenty-First Midwest Symposiums, Circuits and Systems, 14–15 Aug. 1978, (Iowa State U.), pp. 364–368.
  11. D. Casasent, A. Furman, Appl. Opt. 16, 285 (1977). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited