OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 22, Iss. 23 — Dec. 1, 1983
  • pp: 3771–3777

Ground reflectance measurement techniques: a comparison

M. J. Duggin and T. Cunia  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 22, Issue 23, pp. 3771-3777 (1983)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.22.003771


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (812 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The relative accuracies of reflectance factor measurement methods involving the simultaneous, as compared to the sequential, measurement of irradiance on and radiance reflected from the target are discussed. Data are presented to support a statistical demonstration that the simultaneous measurement technique is the more accurate.

© 1983 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: April 12, 1983
Published: December 1, 1983

Citation
M. J. Duggin and T. Cunia, "Ground reflectance measurement techniques: a comparison," Appl. Opt. 22, 3771-3777 (1983)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-22-23-3771


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. J. Duggin, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 48, 142 (1982).
  2. M. J. Duggin, Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 356, 150 (1982).
  3. M. J. Duggin, Appl. Opt. 20, 3816 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. G. H. Suits, Remote Sensing Environ. 2, 117 (1972). [CrossRef]
  5. G. H. Suits, Remote Sensing Environ. 2, 175 (1972). [CrossRef]
  6. J. A. Smith, R. E. Oliver, “Plant Canopy Models for Simulating Composite Scene Spectroradiance in the 0.4–1.05 Micrometer Region,” Proceedings, Eighth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, (Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1972), pp. 1333–1353.
  7. W. Verhoef, N. J. J. Bunnik, NIWARS Tech. Report. No. 35 (Delft, Netherlands, 1976).
  8. E. J. Milton, Int. J. Remote Sensing 1, 153 (1980).
  9. E. J. Milton, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 47, 1223 (1981).
  10. E. J. Milton, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 48, 1474 (1982).
  11. C. J. Tucker, Appl. Opt. 16, 1151 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. C. J. Tucker, B. N. Holben, J. H. Elgin, J. E. McMurtry, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 46, 657 (1980).
  13. M. J. Duggin, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 46, 643 (1980).
  14. D. S. Kimes, V. A. Kirchner, W. W. Newcomb, Appl. Opt. 22, 8 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J. A. Kirchner, S. Youkhana, J. A. Smith, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 48, 955 (1982).
  16. K. T. Kriebel, Remote Sensing Environ. 4, 257 (1976). [CrossRef]
  17. D. S. Kimes, J. A. Smith, K. J. Ransom, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 46, 1563 (1980).
  18. C. S. T. Daughtry, V. C. Vanderbilt, V. J. Pollara, “Variability of Reflectance Measurements With Sensor Altitude and Canopy Type,” NASA Report NAS 9-15466 (U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C., 1981).
  19. M. J. Duggin, “On the Natural Limitations of Target Differentiation by Spectral Discrimination Techniques,” in Proceedings, Ninth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1974), pp. 499–516.
  20. M. J. Duggin, W. R. Philipson, Appl. Opt. 21, 2833 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. M. J. Duggin, Appl. Opt. 16, 521 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. O. L. Davies, Statistical Methods in Research and Production (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1961), p. 41.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited