OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 23, Iss. 15 — Aug. 1, 1984
  • pp: 2503–2506

Wind measurement accuracy of the NOAA pulsed infrared Doppler lidar

Freeman F. Hall, Jr., R. Milton Huffaker, R. Michael Hardesty, M. E. Jackson, T. Rhidian Lawrence, Madison J. Post, R. A. Richter, and B. F. Weber  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 23, Issue 15, pp. 2503-2506 (1984)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.002503


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (505 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Wind fields measured with a pulsed infrared (CO2) Doppler lidar are compared with measurements by in situ anemometers, balloons, and radar. Radial winds were measured at slant ranges between 1.5 and 12 km during the various comparisons. The standard deviation of the differences between the lidar and the other measurement methods varied from 0.34 m sec−1 for sonic anemometer comparisons to 2.5 m sec−1 for balloon methods. Differences may be due to an inherent difficulty in comparing spatial and temporal averages of winds.

© 1984 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: January 20, 1984
Published: August 1, 1984

Citation
Freeman F. Hall, R. Milton Huffaker, R. Michael Hardesty, M. E. Jackson, T. Rhidian Lawrence, Madison J. Post, R. A. Richter, and B. F. Weber, "Wind measurement accuracy of the NOAA pulsed infrared Doppler lidar," Appl. Opt. 23, 2503-2506 (1984)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-23-15-2503


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. M. Lhermitte, D. Atlas, “Precipitation Motion by Pulse Doppler Radar Techniques,” in Proceedings, Ninth Weather Radar Conference, American Meteorological Society, Boston (1961), pp. 218–223.
  2. T. R. Lawrence, D. J. Wilson, C. E. Craven, I. P. Jones, R. M. Huffaker, J. A. L. Thomson, “A Laser Velocimeter for Remote Wind Sensing,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 512 (1972). [CrossRef]
  3. M. J. Post, R. L. Schwiesow, R. E. Cupp, D. A. Haugen, J. T. Newman, “A Comparison of Anemometer-and Lidar-Sensed Wind Velocity Data,” J. Appl. Meteorol. 17, 1179 (1978). [CrossRef]
  4. C. A. DiMarzio, J. W. Bilbro, “An Airborne Doppler Lidar,” in “Heterodyne Systems and Technology,” NASA Conf. Publ. 2138 (1980), pp. 529–540.
  5. T. R. Lawrence, R. M. Hardesty, M. J. Post, R. A. Richter, R. M. Huffaker, F. F. Hall, “Performance Characteristics of the NOAA Pulsed Doppler Lidar and its Application to Atmospheric Measurements,” in Preprint Volume Fifth Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation (American Meteorological Society, Boston, Mass., 1983), pp. 481–487.
  6. J. C. Kaimal, J. E. Gaynor, “The Boulder Atmospheric Observatory,” J. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 863 (1983). [CrossRef]
  7. W. E. Hoehne, “Precision of National Weather Service Upper Air Measurements,” NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS T&ED-16, Test and Evaluation Division, Sterling, Va. (1980).
  8. D. L. Johnson, W. W. Vaughan, “Sequential High-Resolution Wind Profile Measurements,” NASA Tech. Paper 1354, Marshall Space Flight Center, Ala. (1978).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited