OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 24, Iss. 21 — Nov. 1, 1985
  • pp: 3472–3475

Effect of pulse-pair correlation on differential absorption lidar

Russell E. Warren  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 24, Issue 21, pp. 3472-3475 (1985)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.003472


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (426 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Calculations are presented of the effect of pulse-pair correlation on the detection statistics of alarm systems using differential absorption lidar (DIAL) for the remote sensing of toxic gases. This experimentally observed correlation is found to have a significant beneficial effect on the performance of such systems. The calculations are performed for both coherent- and direct-detection DIAL systems using a statistical detection model that assumes a bivariate normal distribution for the on- and off-resonance returns.

© 1985 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: January 29, 1985
Published: November 1, 1985

Citation
Russell E. Warren, "Effect of pulse-pair correlation on differential absorption lidar," Appl. Opt. 24, 3472-3475 (1985)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-24-21-3472


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. C. Harney, “Laser prf Considerations in Differential Absorption Lidar Applications,” Appl. Opt. 22, 3747 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. P. Brockman, R. V. Hess, C. H. Bair, “CO2 DIAL Sensitivity Studies for Measurements of Atmospheric Trace Gases,” in Optical and Laser Remote Sensing, D. K. Killinger, A. Mooradian, Eds. (Springer, New York, 1983).
  3. R. M. Schotland, “Errors in the Lidar Measurement of Atmospheric Gases by Differential Absorption,” J. Appl. Meteorol. 13, 71 (1974). [CrossRef]
  4. D. K. Killinger, N. Menyuk, W. E. DeFeo, “Experimental Comparison of Heterodyne and Direct Detection for Pulsed Differential Absorption CO2 Lidar,” Appl. Opt. 22, 682 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. J. H. Shapiro, B. A. Capron, R. C. Harney, “Imaging and Target Detection with a Heterodyne-Reception Optical Radar,” Appl. Opt. 20, 3292 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Equation (6) assumes the on- and off-resonance signal-to-noise ratios are approximately equal as they would be for weak toxic gas absorption and equal atmospheric extinction. It also neglects pulse correlation which would introduce an additional factor 1−μ.
  7. In Eq. (7) it is intended that the N-pulse averaging takes place before ratioing or taking the logarithm. Computer simulations have shown that averaging the ratios of the individual pulses produces a biased estimator for CL while averaging the differences of the logarithms increases the variance in the estimator.
  8. M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1965).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited