OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 27, Iss. 3 — Feb. 1, 1988
  • pp: 552–556

Modal noise due to short-wavelength (780–900-nm) transmission in single-mode fibers optimized for 1300 nm

Santanu K. Das  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 552-556 (1988)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.27.000552


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (769 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The power penalty due to modal noise has been quantified and experimentally verified for single-mode fiber systems operating above their cutoff frequency. It is shown how the modal power distribution evolves from one connector/splice to the next and affects the degree of modal noise.

© 1988 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: June 16, 1987
Published: February 1, 1988

Citation
Santanu K. Das, "Modal noise due to short-wavelength (780–900-nm) transmission in single-mode fibers optimized for 1300 nm," Appl. Opt. 27, 552-556 (1988)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-27-3-552


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. L. Soderstrom, T. R. Block, D. L. Karst, T. Lu, “The Compact Disc (CD) Laser as a Low-Cost, High Performance Source for Fiber Optic Communication,” in Technical Digest, FOC/LAN 86, Orlando (1986), p.263.
  2. R. E. Epworth, “The phenomenon of Modal Noise in Analog and Digital Optical Fiber Systems,” in Technical Digest, Fourth European Conference on Optical Communication, Genoa (1978), p. 492.
  3. T. H. Wood, “Actual Modal Power Distributions in Multimode Optical Fibers and their Effect on Modal Noise,” Opt. Lett. 9, 102 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. T. H. Wood, L. A. Ewell, “Increased Received Power and Decreased Modal Noise by Preferential Excitation of Low-Order Modes in Multimode Optical Fiber Transmission Systems,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. LT-4, 391 (1986). [CrossRef]
  5. K. Petermann, “Nonlinear Distortions and Noise in Optical Communication Systems due to Fiber Connectors,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-16, 761 (1980). [CrossRef]
  6. I. A. White, S. C. Mettler, “Modal Analysis of Loss and Mode Mixing in Multimode Parabolic Index Splices,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 62, 1189 (1983).
  7. J. Sakai, T. Kimura, “Splice Loss Evaluation for Optical Fibers with Arbitrary Index Profile,” Appl. Opt. 17, 2848 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. F. T. Stone, “Modal Noise in Singlemode Fiber Communication System,” Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 500, 17 (1984).
  9. N. K. Cheung, A. Tomita, P. F. Glodis, “Observation of Modal Noise in Singlemode Fiber Transmission Systems,” Electron. Lett. 21, 5 (1985). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Heckmann, “Modal Noise in Singlemode Fibers Operated Slightly above Cutoff,” Electron. Lett. 17, 499 (1981). [CrossRef]
  11. F. M. Sears, I. A. White, R. B. Kummer, F. T. Stone, “Probability of Modal Noise in Single-Mode Lightguide Systems,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. LT-4, 652 (1986). [CrossRef]
  12. M. Stern, W. I. Way, V. Shah, M. B. Romeiser, W. C. Young, J. W. Krupsky, “800-nm Digital Transmission in 1300-nm Optimized Singlemode Fiber,” in Technical Digest, Optical Fiber Communication Conference–Sixth International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1987), paper MD2.
  13. D. Marcuse, “Loss Analysis of Singlemode Fiber Splices,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 56, 703 (1977).
  14. D. Gloge, “Offset and Tilt Loss in Optical Fiber Splices,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 55, 905 (1976).
  15. P. R. Couch, R. E. Epworth, J. M. T. Rowe, R. W. Musk, “The Modal Noise Characterization and Specification of Lasers with Fiber Tails,” in Technical Digest, Ninth European Conference on Optical Communication, Geneva (1983), p. 139.
  16. D. Uttam, “Measurement of Intermodal Delay in a Dual-Mode Optical Fiber,” Electron. Lett. 21, 1031 (1985). [CrossRef]
  17. D. Gloge, “Weakly Guiding Fibers,” Appl. Opt. 10, 2247 (1971).
  18. Actually there are two modes with orthogonal polarizations Ex and Ey, the term SMF thus applies to a given polarization of light power.
  19. Due to nonzero l, there are two orthogonal polarizations Ex and Ey, and two orientations coslϕ and sinlϕ.
  20. D. Marcuse, D. Gloge, E. A. J. Marcatili, “Guiding Properties of Fibers,” in Optical Fiber Telecommunications, S. E. Miller, A. G. Chynoweth, Eds. (Academic, New York, 1979), p. 45.
  21. S. Kawakami, S. Nishida, “Perturbation Theory of a Doubly Clad Optical Fiber with a Low-Index Inner Cladding,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-11, 130 (1975). [CrossRef]
  22. M. Monerie, “Propagation in Doubly Clad Single-Mode Fibers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-18, 535 (1982). [CrossRef]
  23. P. F. Glodis, M. J. Buckler, AT&T Bell Laboratories; private communication.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited