Abstract

Two algorithms for analyzing speckle photography fringes for spacing and orientation using a digital image processing system are compared. Each algorithm was tested for accuracy and computer run-time through a computer simulation which includes the degradation of data by noise.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

Digital processing of dual-plate speckle photography data

Guillermo H. Kaufmann and Gustavo E. Galizzi
Appl. Opt. 31(10) 1537-1541 (1992)

Two-dimensional digital processing of speckle photography fringes. 2: Diffraction halo influence for the noisy case

Saul A. Isacson and Guillermo H. Kaufmann
Appl. Opt. 24(10) 1444-1447 (1985)

Speckle photography fringe analysis: assessment of current algorithms

J. M. Huntley
Appl. Opt. 28(20) 4316-4322 (1989)

Two-dimensional digital processing of speckle photography fringes. 1: Diffraction halo influence for the noise-free case

S. A. Isacson and Guillermo H. Kaufmann
Appl. Opt. 24(2) 189-193 (1985)

Range and accuracy of speckle displacement measurement in double-exposure speckle photography

Jin Seung Kim
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6(5) 675-681 (1989)