OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 28, Iss. 6 — Mar. 15, 1989
  • pp: 1135–1144

Selective loss of pattern discrimination in early glaucoma

Bruce A. Drum, Matthew Severns, David K. O’Leary, Robert W. Massof, Harry A. Quigley, Michael E. Breton, and Theodore Krupin  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 1135-1144 (1989)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.28.001135


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1505 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A new perimetric pattern discrimination test was compared with conventional automated perimetry (Humphrey program 30-2 or Octopus program 32) in glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and control subjects. The new test is based on the rationale that a greater percentage of retinal ganglion cells should be needed to detect a stimulus by its shape, or pattern, than by its brightness. The pattern discrimination stimulus was a patch of nonrandom dots embedded in a surrounding random dot field of the same average density. Pattern discrimination thresholds were measured by changing the degree of regularity, or coherence, of the stimulus dots. The fully coherent target was a static, 1-s duration, 20 × 20-dot checkerboard. Using a criterion-free relative operating characteristic analysis, we estimated the ability of both the pattern discrimination and conventional tests to distinguish the normal data distribution from the suspect and glaucoma distributions. The pattern discrimination test appeared to produce separations greater than conventional perimetry for glaucoma suspects and separations equivalent to conventional perimetry for glaucoma patients.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: August 8, 1988
Published: March 15, 1989

Citation
Bruce A. Drum, Matthew Severns, David K. O’Leary, Robert W. Massof, Harry A. Quigley, Michael E. Breton, and Theodore Krupin, "Selective loss of pattern discrimination in early glaucoma," Appl. Opt. 28, 1135-1144 (1989)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-28-6-1135


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. A. Quigley, E. Addicks, R. W. Green, “Optic Nerve Damage in Human Glaucoma III. Quantitative Correlation of Nerve Fiber Loss and Visual Field Defect in Glaucoma, Ischemic Neuropathy, Papilledema, and Toxic Neuropathy,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 100, 135 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. H. B. Barlow, W. R. Levick, M. Yoon, “Responses to Single Quanta of Light in Retinal Ganglion Cells of the Cat,” Vision Res. Suppl. 3, 87 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. E. Kaplan, R. M. Shapley, “The Primate Retina Contains 2 Groups of Ganglion Cells, with High and Low Contrast Sensitivity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83, 2755 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. V. H. Perry, R. Oehler, A. Cowey, “Retinal Ganglion Cells that Project to the Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in the Macaque Monkey,” Neurosci. 12, 1101 (1984). [CrossRef]
  5. C. D. Phelps, P. Blondeau, B. Carney, “Acuity Perimetry: a Sensitive Test for the Detection of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Damage,” Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 42, 359 (1984). [CrossRef]
  6. L. Frisén, “A Computer-Graphics Visual Field Screener Using High-Pass Spatial Frequency Resolution Targets and Multiple Feedback Devices,” Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 49, 441 (1987). [CrossRef]
  7. L. Frisén, “Assessing Criterion Levels and ’Functional Channel Fractions’ in High-Pass Resolution Perimetry,” in Proceedings, Eighth IPS Symposium, E. Greve, A. Heijl, Eds. (Kugler, Amsterdam, 1989), in press.
  8. J.-L. Anctil, D. R. Anderson, “Early Foveal Involvement and Generalized Depression of the Visual Field in Glaucoma,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 102, 363 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. B. Drum, M. Breton, R. Massof, H. Quigley, T. Krupin, J. Leight, J. Mangat-Rai, D. O’Leary, “Pattern Discrimination Perimetry: a New Concept in Visual Field Testing,” Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 49, 433 (1987). [CrossRef]
  10. B. Drum, M. Breton, R. Massof, D. O’Leary, M. Severns, “Early Glaucoma Detection with Pattern Discrimination Perimetry,” in Technical Digest of Topical Meeting on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1987), p. 130.
  11. B. Drum, R. Massof, D. O’Leary, H. Quigley, M. Breton, T. Krupin, M. Severns, “Pattern Discrimination Test for Glaucoma,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 28, 62 (1987).
  12. B. Drum, M. Severns, D. O’Leary, R. Massof, M. Breton, H. Quigley, T. Krupin, “Pattern Discrimination Perimetry and Conventional Perimetry in Early Glaucoma Detection,” in Technical Digest of Topical Meeting on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1988), p. 172.
  13. B. Drum, M. Severns, D. O’Leary, R. Massof, H. Quigley, M. Breton, T. Krupin, “Pattern Discrimination and Light Detection Test Different Types of Glaucomatous Damage,” in Proceedings, Eighth IPS Symposium, E. Greve, A. Heijl, Eds. (Kugler, Amsterdam, 1989), in press.
  14. Cohn and Lasley [T. E. Cohn, D. J. Lasley, “Detectability of a Luminance Increment: Effect of Spatial Uncertainty,” J. Opt . Soc. Am. 64, 1715 (1974).] have shown that increasing spatial uncertainty unavoidably increases variability and lowers sensitivity in a similar type of task. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. P. Åsman, A. Heijl, “Background Luminance and Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 29, 240 (1988).
  16. R. W. Massof, T. C. Emmel, “Criterion-Free Parameter-Free Distribution-Independent Index of Diagnostic Test Performance,” Appl. Opt. 26, 1395 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. R. W. Massof, B. A. Drum, G. S. Rubin, “ROC Analysis Applied to Multivariate Diagnostic Tests,” in Technical Digest of Topical Meeting on Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System (Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1988), p. 102.
  18. D. M. Green, J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Krieger, New York, 1974), pp. 45–49.
  19. D. Bamber, “The Area Above the Ordinal Dominance Graph and the Area Below the Receiver Operating Characteristic Graph,” J. Math. Psychol. 12, 387 (1975). [CrossRef]
  20. J. A. Hanley, B. J. MacNeil, “The Meaning and Use of the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve,” Radiology 143, 29 (1982). [PubMed]
  21. Results of the PDP tests were stored on floppy disk on the Horizon computer. Data files were transferred to an IBM-PC/AT compatible computer for analysis via an RS-232 interface using an error-free protocol. Results from the Humphrey perimeter also were transferred to the IBM-PC/AT compatible computer via the RS-232 interface. Results from the Octopus perimeter were entered manually into the computer. All visual field data (PDP and CVF) were transformed to a right-eye format for analysis. PDP coherence thresholds were converted to sensitivities (sensitivity = 100% − threshold) for compatibility with the CVF log sensitivity data. The data were then analyzed using a combination of commercial statistical packages and custom software.
  22. E. Aulhorn, H. Karmeyer, “Frequency Distribution in Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects,” Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 14, 75 (1977).
  23. S. P. Nicholas, E. B. Werner, “Location of Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects,” Can. J. Ophthalmol. 15, 131 (1980). [PubMed]
  24. M. Coughlan, A. I. Friedmann, “The Frequency Distribution of Early Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma,” Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 26, 345 (1981). [CrossRef]
  25. A. Heijl, L. Lundqvist, “The Location of Earliest Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Documented by Automatic Perimetry,” Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Ser. 35, 153 (1983). [CrossRef]
  26. D. B. Henson, A. J. Hobley, “Frequency Distribution of Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 63, 455 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. J. Katz, A. Sommer, “Similarities Between the Visual Fields of Ocular Hypertensive and Normal Eyes,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 104, 1648 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited