OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 28, Iss. 7 — Apr. 1, 1989
  • pp: 1345–1355

Constrained eigenfunction method for the inversion of remote sensing data: application to particle size determination from light scattering measurements

Bill P. Curry  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 28, Issue 7, pp. 1345-1355 (1989)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1508 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The Fredholm equation representing light scattering by an ensemble of uniform dielectric spheres is inverted to obtain the particle size distribution responsible for the scattering features. The method of deconvolution involves a constrained expansion of the solution in Schmidt-Hilbert eigenfunctions of the scattering kernels. That solution is obtained which minimizes the sum of the squared residual errors subject to a trial function constraint. The method is, thus, dualistic to the well-known Phillips-Twomey method of constrained linear inversion for the solution by matrix techniques of a Fredholm equation of the first kind in the presence of error. The method is implemented in doubly iterative fashion, and test deconvolutions containing various levels of error are presented.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: January 13, 1988
Published: April 1, 1989

Bill P. Curry, "Constrained eigenfunction method for the inversion of remote sensing data: application to particle size determination from light scattering measurements," Appl. Opt. 28, 1345-1355 (1989)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. J. Mathews, R. L. Walker, Mathematical Methods of Physics (Benjamin, New York, 1964), pp. 292–297.
  2. C. D. Capps, R. L. Henning, G. M. Hess, “Analytic Inversion of Remote-Sensing Data,” Appl. Opt. 21, 3581 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. S. Twomey, H. B. Howell, “Some Aspects of the Optical Estimation of Microstructure in Fog and Cloud,” Appl. Opt. 6, 2125 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. G. Arfkin, Mathematical Methods for Physicists (Academic, New York, 1970).
  5. G. Viera, M. A. Box, “Information Content Analysis of Aerosol Remote-Sensing Experiments Using Singular Function Theory. 1: Extinction Measurements,” Appl. Opt. 26, 1312 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. S. Twomey, Introduction to the Mathematics of Inversion in Remote Sensing and Indirect Measurements (Elsevier, New York, 1979).
  7. M. Bertero, C. De Mol, E. R. Pike, “Particle Size Distributions from Spectral Turbidity: A Singular-System Analysis,” Inverse Problems 2, 249 (1986). [CrossRef]
  8. D. L. Phillips, “A Technique for the Numerical Solution of Certain Integral Equations of the First Kind,” J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 9, 84 (1962). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Twomey, “On the Numerical Solution of Fredholm Equations of the First Kind by the Inversion of the Linear System Produced by Quadrature,” J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 10, 97 (1963). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Twomey, “The Application of Numerical Filtering to the Solution of Integral Equations Encountered in Indirect Sensing Measurement,” J. Franklin Inst. 279, 95 (1965). [CrossRef]
  11. M. D. King, “Sensitivity of Constrained Linear Inversion to the Selection of the Lagrange Multiplier,” J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 1356 (1982). [CrossRef]
  12. M. D. King, D. M. Byrne, B. M. Herman, J. A. Reagan, “Aerosol Size Distributions Obtained by Inversion of Spectral Optical Measurements,” J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 2153 (1978). [CrossRef]
  13. P. Chylek, “Partial-Wave Resonances and the Ripple Structure in the Mie Normalized Extinction Cross Section,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 285 (1976). [CrossRef]
  14. C. F. Bohren, T. J. Nevitt, “Absorption by a Sphere: a Simple Approximation,” Appl. Opt. 22, 774 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. B. P. Curry, “Improvements in the Constrained Eigenfunction Expansion Method to Invert the Particle Size Distribution from Light Scattering Data,” in Proceedings, 1986 CRDEC Scientific Conference on Obscuration and Aerosol Research, R. H. Kohl, Ed., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, to be published.
  16. N. Wolfson, J. H. Joseph, Y. Mekler, “Comparative Study of Inversion Techniques. Part I: Accuracy and Stability,” J. Appl. Meteorol. 18, 543 (1978). [CrossRef]
  17. N. Wolfson, Y. Mekler, J. H. Joseph, “Comparative Study of Inversion Techniques. Part II: Resolving Power, Conservation of Normalization, and Superposition Principles,” J. Appl. Meteorol. 18, 556 (1978). [CrossRef]
  18. S. Twomey, “Information Content in Remote Sensing,” Appl. Opt. 13, 942 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. M. Kerker, The Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation (Academic, New York, 1969).
  20. J. R. Bottiger, “Intercomparison of Some Inversion Methods on Systems of Spherical Particles,” in Advances in Remote Sensing Retrieval Methods, A. Deepak, H. E. Fleming, M. T. Chahine, (Deepak Publishing, Hampton, VA, 1985).
  21. B. P. Curry, E. L. Kiech, “Determination of the Particle Size Distribution from Blind Inversion of Synthetic Data,” in Proceedings, 1985 Chemical Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Scientific Conference on Obscuration and Aerosol Research, R. H. Kohl, Ed., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, CRDEC-SP-86019 (July1986).
  22. W. A. Pearce, “Aerosol Size Distribution Determination from Scattering Matrix Data,” Applied Systems Department Report 00781, EG&G Washington Analytical Services Center (1982).
  23. R. L. Henning, “Comparative Evaluation of Optical Inversion Techniques,” Report D180-26400-1, Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle (1981).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 4

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited