OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 29, Iss. 22 — Aug. 1, 1990
  • pp: 3303–3315

Gated photomultiplier response characterization for DIAL measurements

H. Sang Lee, Geary K. Schwemmer, C. Laurence Korb, Mark Dombrowski, and Coorg Prasad  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 29, Issue 22, pp. 3303-3315 (1990)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.29.003303


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1562 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The characteristics of various detector responses are studied to understand the cause of various systematic biases and to minimize these undesirable effects in measurements of transient signals with large dynamic range. We quantitatively evaluated signal induced bias, gain variation, and the linearity of commonly used gated photomultipliers in the current integrating mode. Analysis of the results indicates that impurity ions inside the photomultiplier tube are the source of the signal induced bias and gain variation. Two different photomultiplier tubes used in this study show significant differences in the magnitude and decay behavior of signal induced bias. We found it can be minimized by using an external amplifier to reduce PMT gain, and by applying a low potential between the cathode and first dynode. The linearity of a photomultiplier tube is also studied over a large dynamic range of input intensities employing a new technique which does not require an absolute calibration. The result of this study shows that the photomultiplier response is linear only for a limited input intensity range below a certain anode current.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: February 3, 1989
Published: August 1, 1990

Citation
H. Sang Lee, Geary K. Schwemmer, C. Laurence Korb, Mark Dombrowski, and Coorg Prasad, "Gated photomultiplier response characterization for DIAL measurements," Appl. Opt. 29, 3303-3315 (1990)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-29-22-3303


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Fenster, J. C. Leblanc, W. B. Taylor, H. E. Johns, “Linearity and Fatigue in Photomultipliers,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 44, 689–694 (1973). [CrossRef]
  2. W. H. Hunt, S. K. Poultney, “Testing the Linearity of Response of Gated Photomultipliers in Wide Dynamic Range Laser Radar Systems,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS22, 116–120 (1975). [CrossRef]
  3. H. J. Lush, “Photomultiplier Linearity,” J. Sci. Instrum. 42, 597–602 (1965). [CrossRef]
  4. D. H. Hartman, “Pulse Mode Saturation Properties of Photomultiplier Tubes,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 49, 1130–1133 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. P. L. Land, “A Discussion of the Region of Linear Operation of Photomultipliers,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42, 420–425 (1971). [CrossRef]
  6. J. P. Keen, “Fatigue and Saturation in Photomultipliers,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 34, 1220–1222 (1963). [CrossRef]
  7. E. Pitz, “Nonlinearity Measurements on Photometric Devices,” Appl. Opt. 18, 1360–1362 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. C. L. Sanders, “Accurate Measurements of and Correction for Nonlinearities in Radiometers,” J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 76A, 437–453 (1972). [CrossRef]
  9. P. B. Coates, “The Origin of Afterpulses in Photomultipliers,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 6, 1159–1166 (1973). [CrossRef]
  10. P. B. Coates, “A Theory of Afterpulse Formation in Photomultipliers and the Pulse Height Distribution,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 6, 1862–1869 (1973). [CrossRef]
  11. R. J. Riley, A. G. Wright, “The Effect of Photomultiplier Afterpulse in Coincidence Systems,” J. Phys. E 10, 873–874 (1977). [CrossRef]
  12. M. Yamashita, O. Yura, Y. Kawada, “Probability and Time Distribution of Afterpulses in GaP First Dynode Photomultiplier Tubes,” Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. 196, 199–202 (1982). [CrossRef]
  13. D. P. Jones, G. S. Kent, “Measurement of Overload Effect in a Photomultiplier,” J. Phys. E 7, 744–746 (1974). [CrossRef]
  14. G. A. Akopdzhanov, A. V. Inyakin, P. S. Shuvalov, “Photomultiplier Short-term Instability,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 161, 247–257 (1979). [CrossRef]
  15. B. H. Candy, “Photomultiplier Characteristics and Practice Relevant to Photon Counting,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 183–193 (1985). [CrossRef]
  16. M. L. Mead, “Instrumentation Aspects of Photon Counting Applied to Photometry,” J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 14, 909–918 (1981). [CrossRef]
  17. G. K. Schwemmer, M. Dombrowski, C. L. Korb, J. Milrod, H. Walden, R. H. Kagann, “A Lidar System for Measuring Atmospheric Pressure and Temperature Profile,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 2226–2237 (1987). [CrossRef]
  18. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1986).
  19. C. L. Korb, G. K. Schwemmer, M. Dombrowski, C. Y. Weng, “Airborne and Ground Based Lidar Measurements of the Atmospheric Pressure Profile,” Appl. Opt. 28, 3015–3020 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. C. L. Korb, C. Y. Weng, “A Theoretical Study of a Two Wavelength Lidar Technique for the Measurement of Atmospheric Temperature Profiles,” J. Appl. Meteorol. 21, 1346–1355 (1982). [CrossRef]
  21. H. S. W. Massey, E. H. S. Burhop, Electronic and Ionic Impact Phenomena, Vol. 1 (Clarendon, Oxford, U.K., 1969), Chap. 3.
  22. Ya. B. Zeldovich, Yu. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic, New York, 1966).
  23. J. D. W. Barrick, “Gating Characteristics of Photomultiplier Tubes for Lidar Applications,” NASA Tech Memo. 8769S (1986).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited