Abstract
A letter by Mohebi et al. [ Opt. Lett. 13, 649– 651 ( 1988)] claims that the large value of n2 of CS2 at 10 μm (2.2 × 10−10 esu) measured by that group is due to electrostriction as opposed to the Kerr effect-induced n2 of 2.1 × 10−11 esu. We compare contributions of different nonlinear mechanisms to n2 and find that absorption-induced thermal nonlinearity should have been dominant in that experiment.
© 1990 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
M. Mohebi, M. J. Soileau, and E. W. Van Stryland
Opt. Lett. 13(8) 649-650 (1988)
I. Golub, Y. Beaudoin, and S. L. Chin
Opt. Lett. 13(6) 488-490 (1988)
Yuji Matsuura, Akihito Hongo, and Mitsunobu Miyagi
Appl. Opt. 29(15) 2213-2214 (1990)