OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 29, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 1990
  • pp: 5007–5013

Operating characteristics of a tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer using short-external-cavity and DFB laser diodes

Brian F. Ventrudo and Daniel T. Cassidy  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 29, Issue 33, pp. 5007-5013 (1990)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.29.005007


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1011 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Second harmonic detection at audio frequencies of isolated absorption lines with a laser absorption spectrometer employing AlGaAs and InGaAsP diode lasers, short external cavity (SXC) AlGaAs and InGaAsP diode lasers, and InGaAsP distributed feedback (DFB) diode lasers was investigated and compared. Noise levels equivalent to line center absorptions of ~3 × 10−6 were achieved with each source. Single mode tuning ranges of 20–50 cm−1 were obtained with both the SXC and DFB sources. The contamination of absorption spectra by suppressed laser side modes was identified and investigated as it relates to the identification of weak lines in the presence of strong lines.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: March 15, 1990
Published: November 20, 1990

Citation
Brian F. Ventrudo and Daniel T. Cassidy, "Operating characteristics of a tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer using short-external-cavity and DFB laser diodes," Appl. Opt. 29, 5007-5013 (1990)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-29-33-5007


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Sasada, “Stark Modulation Spectroscopy of NH3 with a 1.23-μm Semiconductor Laser,” Opt. Lett. 9, 448–450 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. D. T. Cassidy, “Trace Gas Detection Using 1.3-μm InGaAsP Diode Laser Transmitter Modules,” Appl. Opt. 27, 610–614 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. H. Sasada, “1.5-μm DFB Semiconductor Laser Spectroscopy of HCN,” J. Chem. Phys. 88, 767–777 (1988). [CrossRef]
  4. T. Yanagawa, S. Saito, Y. Yamamoto, “Frequency Stabilization of a 1.5-μm InGaAsP DFB Laser to NH3 Absorption Lines,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 826–828 (1984). [CrossRef]
  5. H. Sasada, K. Yamada, “The Calibration Lines of HCN in the 1.5-μm Region,” Appl. Opt. 29, 3535–3547 (1990), 10Aug.? [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. D. T. Cassidy, L. J. Bonnell, “Trace Gas Detection with Short-External-Cavity InGaAsP Diode Laser Transmitter Modules Operating at 1.58 μm,” Appl. Opt. 27, 2688–2693 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. L. J. Bonnell, D. T. Cassidy, “Alignment Tolerances of Short-External-Cavity InGaAsP Diode Lasers For Use as Tunable Single-Mode Sources,” Appl. Opt. 28, 4622–4628 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. M. Bruce, D. T. Cassidy, “Detection of Oxygen Using Short External Cavity GaAs Semiconductor Diode Lasers,” Appl. Opt. 29, 1327–1332 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. J. Reid, J. Shewchun, B. K. Garside, E. A. Ballik, “High Sensitivity Pollution Detection Employing Tunable Diode Lasers,” Appl. Opt. 17, 300–307 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. D. T. Cassidy, J. Reid, “Atmospheric Pressure Monitoring of Trace Gases Using Tunable Diode Lasers,” Appl. Opt. 21, 1185–1190 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. J. Reid, D. Labrie, “Second-Harmonic Detection with Tunable Diode Lasers—Comparison of Experiment and Theory,” Appl. Phys. B 26, 203–210 (1981). [CrossRef]
  12. P. Pokrowsky, W. Zapka, F. Chu, G. C. Bjorklund, “High-Frequency Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy with Diode Lasers,” Opt. Commun. 44, 175–179 (1983). [CrossRef]
  13. P. Werle, F. Slemr, M. Gehrtz, C. Brauchle, “Wideband Noise Characteristics of a Lead-Salt Diode Laser: Possibility of Quantum Noise Limited TDLAS Performance,” Appl. Opt. 28, 1638–1642 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. P. Werle, F. Slemr, M. Gehrtz, C. Brauchle, “Quantum-Limited FM-Spectroscopy with a Lead-Salt Diode Laser,” Appl. Phys. B 49, 99–108 (1989). [CrossRef]
  15. A. C. Stanton, J. A. Silver, “Measurements in the HCl 3–0 Band Using a Near IR InGaAsP Diode Laser,” Appl. Opt. 27, 5009–5015 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. L.-G. Wang, D. A. Tate, H. Riris, T. F. Gallagher, “High-Sensitivity Frequency-Modulation Spectroscopy with a GaAlAs Diode Laser,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 871–876 (1989). [CrossRef]
  17. N. C. Wong, J. L. Hall, “High-Resolution Measurement of Water-Vapor Overtone Absorption in the Visible by Frequency-Modulation Spectroscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 2300–2308 (1989). [CrossRef]
  18. C. B. Carlisle, D. E. Cooper, “Tunable-Diode-Laser Frequency Modulation Spectroscopy Using Balanced Homodyne Detection,” Opt. Lett. 14, 1306–1308 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. L. S. Rothman et al., “The HITRAN Database: 1986 Edition,” Appl. Opt. 26, 4058–4097 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. D. T. Cassidy, J. Reid, “Harmonic Detection with Tunable Diode Lasers—Two-Tone Modulation,” Appl. Phys. B 29, 279–285 (1982). [CrossRef]
  21. D. T. Cassidy, “Influence on the Steady-State Oscillation Spectrum of a Diode Laser for Light Interacting Coherently and Incoherently with the Field Established in the Laser Cavity,” Appl. Opt. 23, 2070–2077 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Harmonic detection can be performed if, instead of the laser wavelength, some property is modulated that influences the wavelength of absorption of a particular molecular species. Stark modulation of neutral molecules or velocity modulation of molecular ions are examples of such techniques. If the laser wavelength is not modulated, the weak fringes caused by accidental etalons (of finesse ≈ 10−4) in the optical path should not be observed. In such cases, the laser beam noise will limit the sensitivity of the TDLAS.
  23. The modulation required for atmospheric pressure detection will sweep over a greater number of fringes than the modulation required for low pressure detection. The maximum fringe signal should reduce as the modulation depth is increased. However, the difference in the modulation noise between detection of atmospheric pressure absorptions with AlGaAs lasers and detection of low pressure absorptions with InGaAsP lasers is greater than predicted theoretically. See Ref. 20.
  24. H. Sasada, Keio U., Japan; private communication.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited