OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 31, Iss. 25 — Sep. 1, 1992
  • pp: 5331–5340

Light-trap design using multiple reflections and solid-angle attenuation: application to a spaceborne electron spectrometer

Federico A. Herrero  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 31, Issue 25, pp. 5331-5340 (1992)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1438 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The design and performance of a new light trap for a spaceborne electron spectrometer are described. The light trap has a measured photon-rejection ratio of 2 × 10−11, allowing only one in 5 × 1010 incident photons to reach the sensitive area of the instrument. This rejection is more than sufficient because the ambient ultraviolet in Earth orbit requires a rejection no better than 10−8 to maintain the photon interference to less than 10 count/s. The light trap uses triple reflections to keep most of the light passing through the entrance slit away from the sensitive area of the spectrometer. However, because of electron-optic requirements, the edge of one of the metallic electrodes falls within the field of view of the sensitive area, allowing double-reflection photon paths to reach the sensitive area. Assuming diffuse reflectance r, the author shows that the photon rejection can be written as ∊ = G2r2 + G3r3 with G3 approximately 10 times larger than G2. Both coefficients depend only on the internal surface geometry; G2 represents the electrode edge reflections (second-order) and G3 represents the triple-reflection (third-order) paths. As shown by the analysis and measurements taken at two different values of r, the rejection is controlled by triple reflections if r > 0.08. It is shown that the average reflectance of all the internal surfaces must be less than 0.006, which is consistent with the data on the black coating applied to all surfaces. The analysis makes it possible to compare the photon contributions of each of the internal reflecting areas and to estimate the effective scattering width of the metallic electrode edge.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: September 27, 1990
Published: September 1, 1992

Federico A. Herrero, "Light-trap design using multiple reflections and solid-angle attenuation: application to a spaceborne electron spectrometer," Appl. Opt. 31, 5331-5340 (1992)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. W. G. Fastie, “Ultraviolet measurements in planetary atmospheres,” Appl. Opt. 6, 397–402 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. V. M. Vasyliunas, Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 9B of Plasma Physics, R. H. Lovberg, ed. (Academic, New York, 1971) p. 49. [CrossRef]
  3. E. C. Sittler, Rep. NASA TM-85037 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., 1983).
  4. W. E. McClintock, C. A. Barth, R. E. Steele, G. M. Lawrence, J. G. Timothy, “Rocket-borne instrument with a high-resolution microchannel plate detector for planetary UV spectroscopy,” Appl. Opt. 21, 3071–3079 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A honeycomb structure of low-reflectance material was considered, because this material has been used successfully in other energy analyzers [e.g., G. L. Wrenn, J. F. E. Johnson, J. J. Sojka, “The supra-thermal plasma analysers on the ESA GEOS satellites,” Space Sci. Instrum. 5, 271–293 (1981)]. However, adequate mechanical mounting of the honeycomb structure would take much more mass than was required with the present approach.
  6. G. R. Carruthers, T. Page, R. R. Meier, “Apollo 16 Lyman alpha imagery of the hydrogen geocorona,” J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1664 (1976). [CrossRef]
  7. L. J. Heroux, H. E. Hinteregger, Handbook of Geophysics and the Space Environment, A. S. Jursa, ed. (U.S. Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Hanscom Field, Mass., 1985) pp. 2-1–2-16.
  8. C. Martin, S. Bowyer, “Quantum efficiency of opaque CsI photocathodes with channel electron multiplier arrays in the extreme and far ultraviolet,” Appl. Opt. 21, 4206–4207 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. J. D. Winningham, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex. (personal communication, 1989).
  10. R. G. Johnston, R. P. Madden, “On the use of thermopiles for absolute radiometry in the far ultraviolet,” Appl. Opt. 4, 1574–1580 (1965). [CrossRef]
  11. C. E. Johnson, “Black electroless nickel surface morphologies with extremely high light absorption capacity,” Met. Finish. 16, 21–24 (1980); “Ultra-black coating for high absorptance of solar energy,” Dimensions NBS 63, 30–31 (1979).
  12. P. Jelinsky, S. Jelinsky, “Low reflectance EUV materials: a comparative study,” Appl. Opt. 26, 613–615 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. J. Heaney, R. Keski-Kuha, internal memoranda, Code 717 (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., 1989).
  14. This ratio is adopted from previous use in practice. Strictly speaking, the ratio measures the photons not rejected by the light trap. Perhaps a more adequate representation of the rejection is given by the reciprocal of the ratio, fo/fi, which corresponds to the efficiency of rejection.
  15. The fraction of the illuminated area is computed with the rays proceeding from one surface to the other, taking into account the presence of the obstacle. The fraction given is the ratio of the intensity received by the illuminated surface with the obstacle in place to the intensity that it would receive without the obstacle.
  16. M. C. Shai, internal memoranda, Code 732.5 (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., 1989).
  17. D. Milsom, Rep. 1860 (Breault Research Organization, Tucson, Arizona, 1990).
  18. The grazing angle is the complement of the incidence angle used in our calculations in Table 1.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 4 Fig. 5

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited