Discrepancies between two formulations of signal-to-noise ratio for background-limited detection
Applied Optics, Vol. 34, Issue 15, pp. 2721-2723 (1995)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.002721
Acrobat PDF (92 KB)
Abstract
Different investigators have published different relationships for the same problem of predicting the signal-to-noise ratio for incoherent passive detection of infrared radiation. The results of two authors are compared, and a possible basis for the differences is explained.
© 1995 Optical Society of America
Citation
Dennis F. Flanigan, "Discrepancies between two formulations of signal-to-noise ratio for background-limited detection," Appl. Opt. 34, 2721-2723 (1995)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-34-15-2721
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription
« Previous Article | Next Article »
OSA is a member of 