OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 35, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 1996
  • pp: 6560–6567

Range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory for optics of fractal aggregates

T. L. Farias, Ü. Ö. Köylü, and M. G. Carvalho  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 35, Issue 33, pp. 6560-6567 (1996)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006560


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (668 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans approximation for the optical cross sections of fractal aggregates (RDG-FA) that are formed by uniform small particles was evaluated in comparison with the integral equation formulation for scattering (IEFS), which accounts for the effects of multiple scattering and self-interaction. Numerical simulations were performed to create aggregates that exhibit mass fractallike characteristics with a wide range of particle and aggregate sizes and morphologies, including x p = 0.01–1.0, |m − 1| = 0.1–2.0, N = 16–256, and D f = 1.0–3.0. The percent differences between both scattering theories were presented as error contour charts in the |m − 1|x p domains for various size aggregates, emphasizing fractal properties representative of diffusion-limited cluster–cluster aggregation. These charts conveniently identified the regions in which the differences were less than 10%, between 10% and 30%, and more than 30% for easy to use general guidelines for suitability of the RDG-FA theory in any scattering applications of interest, such as laser-based particulate diagnostics. Various types of aggregate geometry ranging from straight chains (D f ≈ 1.0) to compact clusters (D f ≈ 3.0) were also considered for generalization of the findings. For the present computational conditions, the RDG-FA theory yielded accurate predictions to within 10% for |m − 1| to approximately 1 or more as long as the primary particles in aggregates were within the Rayleigh scattering limit (x p ≤ 0.3). Additionally, the effect of fractal dimension on the performance of the RDG-FA was generally found to be insignificant. The results suggested that the RDG-FA theory is a reasonable approximation for optics of a wide range of fractal aggregates, considerably extending its domain of applicability.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: November 8, 1995
Revised Manuscript: April 29, 1996
Published: November 20, 1996

Citation
T. L. Farias, Ü. Ö. Köylü, and M. G. Carvalho, "Range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory for optics of fractal aggregates," Appl. Opt. 35, 6560-6567 (1996)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-35-33-6560

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited