OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 35, Iss. 33 — Nov. 20, 1996
  • pp: 6560–6567

Range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory for optics of fractal aggregates

T. L. Farias, Ü. Ö. Köylü, and M. G. Carvalho  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 35, Issue 33, pp. 6560-6567 (1996)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.006560


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (668 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans approximation for the optical cross sections of fractal aggregates (RDG-FA) that are formed by uniform small particles was evaluated in comparison with the integral equation formulation for scattering (IEFS), which accounts for the effects of multiple scattering and self-interaction. Numerical simulations were performed to create aggregates that exhibit mass fractallike characteristics with a wide range of particle and aggregate sizes and morphologies, including x p = 0.01–1.0, |m − 1| = 0.1–2.0, N = 16–256, and D f = 1.0–3.0. The percent differences between both scattering theories were presented as error contour charts in the |m − 1|x p domains for various size aggregates, emphasizing fractal properties representative of diffusion-limited cluster–cluster aggregation. These charts conveniently identified the regions in which the differences were less than 10%, between 10% and 30%, and more than 30% for easy to use general guidelines for suitability of the RDG-FA theory in any scattering applications of interest, such as laser-based particulate diagnostics. Various types of aggregate geometry ranging from straight chains (D f ≈ 1.0) to compact clusters (D f ≈ 3.0) were also considered for generalization of the findings. For the present computational conditions, the RDG-FA theory yielded accurate predictions to within 10% for |m − 1| to approximately 1 or more as long as the primary particles in aggregates were within the Rayleigh scattering limit (x p ≤ 0.3). Additionally, the effect of fractal dimension on the performance of the RDG-FA was generally found to be insignificant. The results suggested that the RDG-FA theory is a reasonable approximation for optics of a wide range of fractal aggregates, considerably extending its domain of applicability.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: November 8, 1995
Revised Manuscript: April 29, 1996
Published: November 20, 1996

Citation
T. L. Farias, Ü. Ö. Köylü, and M. G. Carvalho, "Range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans theory for optics of fractal aggregates," Appl. Opt. 35, 6560-6567 (1996)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-35-33-6560


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Ü. Ö. Köylü, G. M. Faeth, “Radiative properties of flame-generated soot,” J. Heat Transfer 115, 409–417 (1993). [CrossRef]
  2. B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983).
  3. R. Jullien, R. Botet, Aggregation and Fractal Aggregates (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
  4. Ü. Ö. Köylü, G. M. Faeth, “Structure of overfire soot in buoyant turbulent diffusion flames at long residence times,” Combust. Flame 89, 140–156 (1992). [CrossRef]
  5. Ü. Ö. Köylü, G. M. Faeth, T. L. Farias, M. G. Carvalho, “Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates,” Combust. Flame 100, 621–633 (1995). [CrossRef]
  6. R. D. Mountain, G. W. Mulholland, “Light scattering from simulated smoke agglomerates,” Langmuir 4, 1321–1326 (1988). [CrossRef]
  7. R. A. Dobbins, C. M. Megaridis, “Absorption and scattering of light by polydisperse aggregates,” Appl. Opt. 30, 4747–4754 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ü. Ö. Köylü, G. M. Faeth, “Optical properties of soot in buoyant turbulent diffusion flames at long residence times,” J. Heat Transfer 116, 152–159 (1994). [CrossRef]
  9. Ü. Ö. Köylü, G. M. Faeth, “Optical properties of soot in buoyant laminar diffusion flames,” J. Heat Transfer 116, 971–979 (1994). [CrossRef]
  10. C. M. Sorensen, J. Cai, N. Lu, “Light-scattering measurements of monomer size, monomers per aggregate, and fractal dimension for soot aggregates in flames,” Appl. Opt. 31, 6547–6557 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. R. A. Dobbins, R. J. Santoro, H. G. Semerjian, “Analysis of light scattering from soot using optical cross sections for aggregates,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1990), pp. 1525–1532.
  12. S. B. Singham, C. F. Bohren, “Scattering of unpolarized and polarized light by particle aggregates of different size and fractal dimension,” Langmuir 9, 1431–1435 (1993). [CrossRef]
  13. G. W. Mulholland, C. F. Bohren, K. A. Fuller, “Light scattering by agglomerates: coupled electric and magnetic dipole method,” Langmuir 10, 2533–2546 (1994). [CrossRef]
  14. T. L. Farias, M. G. Carvalho, Ü. Ö. Köylü, G. M. Faeth, “Computational evaluation of approximate Rayleigh-Debye-Gans/fractal-aggregate theory for the absorption and scattering properties of soot,” J. Heat Transfer 117, 152–159 (1995). [CrossRef]
  15. A. R. Jones, “Electromagnetic wave scattering by assemblies of particles in the Rayleigh approximation,” Proc. R. Soc. London 366, 111–127 (1979). [CrossRef]
  16. D. S. Saxon, “Lectures on the scattering of light,” in The UCLA International Conference on Radiation and Remote Probing of the Atmosphere, J. G. Kuriyan, ed. (U. California Press, Los Angeles, Calif., 1974), pp. 227–308.
  17. J. C. Ku, K.-H. Shim, “A comparison of solutions for light scattering and absorption by agglomerated or arbitrarily-shaped particles,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 47, 201–220 (1992). [CrossRef]
  18. W. Lou, T. T. Charalampopoulos, “On the electromagnetic scattering and absorption of agglomerated small spherical particles,” J. Phys. D 27, 2258–2270 (1994). [CrossRef]
  19. T. L. Farias, Ü. Ö. Köylü, M. G. Carvalho, “Effects of polydispersity of primary particle and aggregate sizes on radiative properties of simulated soot,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 55, 357–371 (1995). [CrossRef]
  20. T. L. Farias, “Evaluation of light scattering theories for fractal aggregates,” Ph.D. dissertation (Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal, 1996), in preparation.
  21. C. F. Bohren, D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  22. M. Kerker, The Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation (Academic, New York, 1969).
  23. Ü. Ö. Köylü, Y. Xing, D. E. Rosner, “Fractal morphology analysis of combustion-generated aggregates using angular light scattering and electron microscope images,” Langmuir 11, 4848–4854 (1995). [CrossRef]
  24. M. V. Berry, I. C. Percival, “Optics of fractal clusters such as smoke,” Opt. Acta 33, 577–591 (1986). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited