OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 36, Iss. 4 — Feb. 1, 1997
  • pp: 903–920

Ultrasensitive laser measurements without tears

Philip C. D. Hobbs  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 903-920 (1997)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.000903


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (599 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Several easily implemented devices for doing ultrasensitive optical measurements with noisy lasers are presented. They are all-electronic noise cancellation circuits that largely eliminate excess laser intensity noise as a source of measurement error and are widely applicable. Shot-noise-limited optical measurements can now easily be made at baseband with noisy lasers. These circuits are especially useful in situations where strong intermodulation effects exist, such as current-tuned diode laser spectroscopy. These inexpensive devices (parts cost ≈$10) can be optimized for particular applications such as wideband or differential measurements. Although they cannot eliminate phase noise effects, they can reduce amplitude noise by 55–70 dB or more, even in unattended operation, and usually achieve the shot-noise limit. With 1-Hz signal-to-noise ratios of 150–160 dB, they allow performance equal or superior to a complex heterodyne system in many cases, while using much simpler dual-beam or homodyne approaches. Although these devices are related to earlier differential and ratiometric techniques, their noise cancellation performance is much better. They work well at modulation frequencies from dc to several megahertz and should be extensible to ≈100 MHz. The circuits work by subtracting photocurrents directly, with feedback applied outside the signal path to continuously adjust the subtraction for perfect balance; thus the excess noise and spurious modulation ideally cancel at all frequencies, leaving only the shot noise. The noise cancellation bandwidth is independent of the feedback bandwidth; it depends only on the speeds of the photodiodes and of the bipolar junction transistors used. Two noise-canceled outputs are available; one is a high-pass filtered voltage proportional to the signal photocurrent and the other is a low-pass filtered voltage related to the log ratio of the signal and comparison photocurrents. For reasonable current densities, the noise floors of the outputs depend only on the shot noise of the signal beam. Four variations on the basic circuit are presented: low noise floor, high cancellation, differential high power, and ratio-only. Emphasis is placed on the detailed operation and design considerations, especially performance extension by compensation of the nonideal character of system components. Experience has shown that some applications advice is required by most users, so that is provided as well.

© 1997 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: April 30, 1996
Published: February 1, 1997

Citation
Philip C. D. Hobbs, "Ultrasensitive laser measurements without tears," Appl. Opt. 36, 903-920 (1997)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-36-4-903


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. L. Forward, “Wideband laser-interferometer gravitational radiation experiment,” Phys. Rev. D 17 (2) , 379–390 (1978). [CrossRef]
  2. G. R. Janik, C. B. Carlisle, T. F. Gallagher, “Two-tone frequency-modulation spectroscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3, 1070–1074 (1986). [CrossRef]
  3. G. C. Bjorklund, “Frequency-modulated spectroscopy: a new method for measuring weak absorptions and dispersions,” Opt. Lett. 5, 15–17 (1980). [CrossRef]
  4. T. H. Wilmshurst, Signal Recovery from Noise in Electronic Instrumentation (Hilger, Boston, 1985). [CrossRef]
  5. M. A. Newkirk, K. J. Vahala, “Amplitude-phase decorrelation: a method for reducing intensity noise in semiconductor lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 13–22 (1991). [CrossRef]
  6. P. J. Miller, “Methods and applications for intensity stabilization of pulsed and cw lasers from 257 nm to 10.6 microns,” in Laser Noise, R. Roy, ed., Proc. SPIE1376, 180–191 (1991). [CrossRef]
  7. E. Ingelstam, “Some quantitative measurements of path differences and gradients by means of phase contrast and new interferometric devices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 536–544 (1957). [CrossRef]
  8. R. Stierlin, R. Bättig, P.-D. Henchoz, H. P. Weber, “Excess noise suppression in a fibre-optic balanced heterodyne detection system,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 18, 445–454 (1986). [CrossRef]
  9. R. P. Moeller, W. K. Burns, “1.06 µm all-fiber gyroscope with noise subtraction,” Opt. Lett. 16, 1902–1904 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. B. Wandernoth, “20 photon/bit 565 Mbit/s PSK homodyne receiver using synchronization bits,” Electron. Lett. 28 (4), 387–388 (1992). [CrossRef]
  11. C. J. Peters, “Laser communications system employing narrow band noise cancellation,” U.S. patent3,465,156 (2Sept.1969).
  12. P. C. D. Hobbs, “Reaching the shot noise limit for $10,” Opt. Photon. News 2 (4) , 17–23 (1991). [CrossRef]
  13. P. C. D. Hobbs, “Shot noise limited optical measurements at baseband with noisy lasers,” in Laser Noise, R. Roy, ed., Proc. SPIE1376, 216–221 (1991). [CrossRef]
  14. P. C. D. Hobbs, “Noise cancelling circuitry for optical systems, with signal dividing and combining means,” U.S. patent5,134,276 (28July1992).
  15. K. L. Haller, P. C. D. Hobbs, “Double beam laser absorption spectroscopy: shot-noise limited performance at baseband with a novel electronic noise canceller,” in Optical Methods for Ultrasensitive Detection and Analysis: Techniques and Applications, B. L. Fearey, ed., Proc. SPIE1435, 298–309 (1991). [CrossRef]
  16. C. L. A. Collins, K. D. Bonin, M. A. Kadar Kallen, “Absolute two photon cross section of Rb measured by differential absorption,” Opt. Lett. 18, 1754–1756 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. P. C. D. Hobbs, “ISICL: in situ coherent lidar for particle detection in semiconductor processing equipment,” Appl. Opt. 34, 1579–1590 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. D. Levenson, W. H. Richardson, S. H. Perlmutter, “Stochastic noise in TEM00 laser-beam position,” Opt. Lett. 14, 779–781 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. D. L. Heinz, J. S. Sweeney, P. Miller, “A laser heating system that stabilizes and controls the temperature: diamond anvil cell applications,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 1568–1575 (1991). [CrossRef]
  20. M. C. Nuss, U. H. Keller, G. T. Harvey, M. S. Heutmaker, P. R. Smith, “Amplitude noise reduction of 50 dB in colliding-pulse mode-locking dye lasers,” Opt. Lett. 15, 1026–1028 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yu. N. Dubnitshev, V. P. Koronkevich, V. S. Sobolev, A. A. Stolpovski, Yu. G. Vasilenko, E. N. Utkin, “Laser Doppler velocimeter as an optoelectronic data processing system,” Appl. Opt. 14 (1) , 180–184 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. B. Reuter, N. Talukder, “A new differential laser microanemometer,” in 1980 European Conference on Optical Systems and Applications, D. J. Kroon, ed., Proc. SPIE236, 226–230 (1980). [CrossRef]
  23. S. Okamura, M. Maruyama, “Improvement on the sensitivity of electro-optical system for electric field strength measurements,” Trans. Inst. Electron. Commun. Eng. Jpn. E 65, 702 (1982).
  24. National Semiconductor, Inc., “LM13600 data sheet,” in Operational Amplifiers Data Book (National Semiconductor, Santa Clara, Calif., 1990).
  25. Precision Monolithics, Inc., PM-1008 data sheet, in Analog IC Data Book (Precision Monolithics, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif., 1990), Vol. 10, pp. 5-556 to 5-566.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited