OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 37, Iss. 2 — Jan. 10, 1998
  • pp: 361–368

Effect of CCD readout noise in astronomical speckle imaging

Jerome A. Zadnik and James W. Beletic  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 361-368 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (909 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A theoretical and experimental comparison of photon-counting cameras and CCD’s for use in astronomical speckle imaging was performed. Photon-counting cameras able to detect single-photon events typically exhibit a lower quantum efficiency (QE) and suffer saturation effects at high light levels. In contrast, CCD’s offer a high QE and virtually unlimited photon-count rate. However CCD’s are limited at lower light levels by noise associated with the readout process. Speckle-imaging performance was quantified by derivation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the power spectrum and the Knox–Thompson product to include CCD readout noise. Ground-based telescope observations at various light levels were obtained with an advanced, high-speed, low-noise CCD camera to verify SNR expressions. The useful operating ranges for these two camera types were compared by consideration of the effects of QE, readout noise, and maximum photon-count rate. Although photon-counting cameras continued to dominate low-light-level applications, CCD’s are shown to offer significant improvements over photon-counting cameras for a wide range of light levels. Future reductions of readout noise will further improve CCD speckle-imaging performance.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1330) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric turbulence
(030.4280) Coherence and statistical optics : Noise in imaging systems
(030.6610) Coherence and statistical optics : Stellar speckle interferometry
(040.1520) Detectors : CCD, charge-coupled device
(110.6150) Imaging systems : Speckle imaging

Original Manuscript: April 21, 1997
Revised Manuscript: September 5, 1997
Published: January 10, 1998

Jerome A. Zadnik and James W. Beletic, "Effect of CCD readout noise in astronomical speckle imaging," Appl. Opt. 37, 361-368 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. A. Labeyrie, “Attainment of diffraction-limited resolution in large telescopes by Fourier analysing speckle patterns in star images,” Astron. Astrophys. 6, 85–87 (1970).
  2. K. T. Knox, B. J. Thompson, “Recovery of images from atmospherically degraded short exposure images,” Astrophys. J. 193, L45–L48 (1974). [CrossRef]
  3. K. T. Knox, “Image retrieval from astronomical speckle patterns,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 1236–1239 (1976). [CrossRef]
  4. G. Weigelt, “Modified astronomical speckle interferometry, speckle masking,” Opt. Commun. 21, 55–59 (1977). [CrossRef]
  5. A. W. Lohmann, G. P. Weigelt, B. Wirnitzer, “Speckle masking in astronomy: triple correlation theory and application,” Appl. Opt. 22, 4028–4037 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. G. Weigelt, B. Wirnitzer, “Image reconstruction by the speckle masking method,” Opt. Lett. 8, 389–391 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. W. Beletic, R. M. Goody, “Recovery of planetary images by speckle imaging,” Appl. Opt. 32, 6909–6921 (1992). [CrossRef]
  8. A. Oppenheim, J. Lim, “The importance of phase in signals,” Proc. IEEE 69, 529–541 (1981). [CrossRef]
  9. J. C. Dainty, M. J. Northcott, “Imaging a randomly translating object at low levels using the triple correlation,” Opt. Commun. 58, 11–14 (1986). [CrossRef]
  10. G. R. Ayers, M. J. Northcott, J. C. Dainty, “Knox–Thompson and triple correlation imaging through atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 963–985 (1988). [CrossRef]
  11. J. W. Beletic, “Comparison of Knox–Thompson and bispectrum algorithms for reconstructing phase of complex extended objects,” in Proceedings of the First European Southern Observatory–National Optical Astronomy Observatories (ESO–NOAO) Conference on High Resolution Imaging by Interferometry, F. Merkle, ed. (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1988), Part 2, No. 29, pp. 357–372.
  12. J. W. Goodman, J. F. Belsher, “Fundamental limitations in linear invariant restoration of atmospherically degraded images,” in Imaging Through the Atmosphere, J. C. Wyant, ed., Proc. SPIE75, 141–154 (1976). [CrossRef]
  13. M. G. Miller, “Noise considerations in stellar speckle interferometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1176–1184 (1977). [CrossRef]
  14. J. A. Zadnik, “The use of charge coupled devices in astronomical speckle imaging,” Ph.D. dissertation (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga., December1993).
  15. P. Nisenson, C. Papaliolios, “Effects of photon noise on speckle image reconstruction with the Knox–Thompson algorithm,” Opt. Commun. 47, 91–96 (1983). [CrossRef]
  16. F. Roddier, “Interferometric imaging in optical astrometry,” in Phys. Rep. 170, 97–166 (1988). [CrossRef]
  17. J. C. Dainty, “Stellar speckle interferometry,” in Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, 2nd ed., J. C. Dainty, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984), Chap. 7.
  18. M. Clampin, F. Paresce, “Photon-counting imaging with a GaAs photocathode: evaluation of the Red-RANICON for astronomical imaging,” Astron. Astrophys. 225, 578–584 (1989).
  19. C. Papaliolios, P. Nisenson, S. Ebstein, “Speckle imaging with the PAPA detector,” Appl. Opt. 24, 287–292 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. J. G. Timothy, “Electronic readout systems for microchannel plates,” IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. NS-32, 427–432 (1985). [CrossRef]
  21. J. Janesick, T. Elliot, “History and advancement of large array scientific CCD imagers,” in Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques, S. B. Howell, ed., Vol. 23 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, Calif., 1992), pp. 1–66.
  22. B. E. Burke, R. W. Mountain, P. J. Daniels, D. C. Harris, “420 × 420 charge-coupled-device imager and four-chip hybrid focal plane,” Opt. Eng. 26, 890–896 (1987). [CrossRef]
  23. B. E. Burke, R. W. Mountain, D. C. Harris, M. W. Bautz, J. P. Doty, G. R. Ricker, P. J. Daniels, “An abuttable CCD imager for visible and x-ray focal plane arrays,” IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 38, 1069–1076 (1991). [CrossRef]
  24. J. C. Twichell, B. E. Burke, R. K. Reich, W. H. McGonagle, C. M. Huang, M. W. Bautz, J. P. Doty, G. R. Ricker, R. W. Mountain, V. S. Dolat, “Advanced CCD imager technology for use from 1 to 10,000 Å,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 2744–2746 (1990). [CrossRef]
  25. J. Janesick, T. Elliot, R. Bredthauer, J. Cover, R. Schaefer, R. Varian, “Recent developments in large area scientific CCD image sensors,” in Optical Sensors and Electronic Photography, M. M. Blouke, D. Pophal, eds., Proc. SPIE1071, 115–133 (1989). [CrossRef]
  26. F. Espenak, Ten Year Planetary Ephemeris: 1986–1995, NASA ref. publ. 1176 (NASA, Planetary Systems Branch, 1986).
  27. P. Jacquinot, B. Rozien-Dossier, “Apodization,” in Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1964), Vol. 3, Chap. 2, pp. 31–184.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited