OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 37, Iss. 26 — Sep. 10, 1998
  • pp: 6151–6160

Cost, performance, and reliability simulator for optical transceiver modules

Charles W. Stirk, Nuri Delen, Adam Fedor, Matthew Ball, R. Brian Hooker, J. S. Wu, Saeed Hareb, T. H. Ju, and Y. C. Lee  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 37, Issue 26, pp. 6151-6160 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (875 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The program couple combines simulators for optical performance, mechanical reliability, and production cost under a graphical–user interface to design, simulate, and evaluate micro-optomechanical structures. The thermal simulator predicts the package temperature distribution on the basis of the materials and the geometry as well as on heat sources, sinks, and boundary conditions. The thermal distribution is input to the mechanical simulator, which calculates the stresses or strains and displacements caused by differential thermal expansion. The optical simulator predicts the impact on the optical efficiency and the cross talk of mechanical and optical parameter variations such as solder heights, misalignments, and wavelength distributions. The cost simulator represents the manufacturing process flow and calculates the final cost and the cost sensitivity on basis of the cost and the yield of each process step. By means of balancing detector and coupling yield, cosimulation from optical to cost domains determines the optimum detector size to produce the lowest-cost transceiver module.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.2340) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics components
(220.4000) Optical design and fabrication : Microstructure fabrication
(220.4880) Optical design and fabrication : Optomechanics
(230.0250) Optical devices : Optoelectronics

Original Manuscript: November 18, 1997
Revised Manuscript: March 4, 1998
Published: September 10, 1998

Charles W. Stirk, Nuri Delen, Adam Fedor, Matthew Ball, R. Brian Hooker, J. S. Wu, Saeed Hareb, T. H. Ju, and Y. C. Lee, "Cost, performance, and reliability simulator for optical transceiver modules," Appl. Opt. 37, 6151-6160 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. D. W. Peterson, J. N. Sweet, S. N. Burchett, A. Hsia, “Stress from flip-chip assembly and underfill; measurements with the ATC4.1 assembly test chip and analysis by finite element method,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 47 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, J. M. Segelken, C. S. D’Egidio, eds. (IEEE, New York, 1997), pp. 134–143.
  2. Y. C. Lee, S. E. Swirhun, W. S. Fu, T. A. Keyser, J. L. Jewell, W. E. Quinn, “Thermal management of VCSEL-based optoelectronic modules,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. Part B 20, 540–547 (1996).
  3. J. A. Sultana, D. R. O’Brien, S. E. Forman, “Finite-element analysis of adhesive butt joints in fiber-optic devices,” in Adhesive Engineering, E. A. Norland, K. M. Liechti, eds., Proc. SPIE1999, 48–58 (1993). [CrossRef]
  4. G. D. Khoe, H. Kock, D. Kuppers, J. H. F. M. Poulissen, H. M. De Vrieze, “Progress in monomode optical-fiber interconnection devices,” J. Lightwave Technol. 2, 217–227 (1984). [CrossRef]
  5. S. Masuda, T. Iwama, “Low-loss lens connector for single-mode fibers,” Appl. Opt. 21, 3475–3483 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. Sakai, T. Kimura, “Design of miniature lens for semiconductor laser to single-mode fiber coupling,” J. Quantum Electron. QE-16, 1059–1066 (1980). [CrossRef]
  7. R. E. Wagner, W. J. Tomlinson, “Coupling efficiency of optics in single mode fiber components,” Appl. Opt. 21, 2671–2688 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. H. Kogelnik, T. Li, “Laser beams and resonators,” Proc. IEEE 54, 1312–1329 (1966). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Sommerfeld, Optics: Lectures on Theoretical Physics (Academic, New York, 1964), p. 197.
  10. P. A. Sandborn, M. S. Abadir, C. F. Murphy, “The tradeoff between peripheral and area array bonding of components in multichip modules,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. Part A 17, 249–256 (1994). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. C. Lee, H. T. Ghaffari, J. M. Segelken, “Internal thermal resistance of a multi-chip packaging design for VLSI based systems,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. Part A 12, 163–169 (1989). [CrossRef]
  12. E. Suhir, “Mechanical approach to the evaluation of the low temperature threshold of added transmission losses in single-coated optical fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 863–867 (1990). [CrossRef]
  13. J. E. Shigley, C. R. Mischke, Mechanical Engineering Design, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989), Chap. 6, pp. 243–246.
  14. D. A. Doane, R. D. Franzon, eds., Multichip Module Technologies and Alternatives—The Basics (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993). [CrossRef]
  15. C. W. Stirk, J. Neff, “The cost of optical interconnects vs MCMs,” in Optics in Computing, Vol. 8 of 1997 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1997), pp. 21–23. [CrossRef]
  16. J. A. Cunningham, “The use and evaluation of yield models in integrated circuit manufacturing,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 3, 60–71 (1990). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited