OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 37, Iss. 5 — Feb. 10, 1998
  • pp: 912–920

Effects of dead zones in multiple-quantum-well binary-phase modulators on optical interconnections

Hanni Inbar and Mohammad R. Taghizadeh  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 37, Issue 5, pp. 912-920 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.000912


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (285 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We investigate the effects of inactive regions [dead zones (DZ’s)] in multiple-quantum-well binary-phase modulators used for free-space dynamic optical interconnection applications. Results, however, have implications for other types of pixelated spatial light modulators (SLM’s). To our knowledge, the effects of DZ’s in SLM’s have not before been thoroughly studied in a context other than optical correlation. We investigate the DZ’s (considered to be either opaque or transmissive) as a feature that may be exploited in system design, calculating light efficiency and fidelity as a function of DZ fractional width. It is shown that in particular cases an appropriate choice of DZ width would lead to an optical interconnection with substantially improved cross-talk performance.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.1390) Image processing : Binary phase-only filters
(200.4650) Optics in computing : Optical interconnects
(230.6120) Optical devices : Spatial light modulators

History
Original Manuscript: June 2, 1997
Revised Manuscript: October 23, 1997
Published: February 10, 1998

Citation
Hanni Inbar and Mohammad R. Taghizadeh, "Effects of dead zones in multiple-quantum-well binary-phase modulators on optical interconnections," Appl. Opt. 37, 912-920 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-37-5-912


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. D. Gianino, C. L. Woods, “General treatment of spatial light modulator dead-zone effects on optical correlation. I. Computer simulations,” Appl. Opt. 32, 6527–6535 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. J. E. Cravatt, M. K. Giles, “An improved model of the TI deformable mirror device,” in Advances in Optical Information Processing IV, D. R. Pape, ed., Proc. SPIE1296, 110–124 (1990). [CrossRef]
  3. M. K. Giles, J. Taylor, N. Grijalva, B. Gioannini, “Optical image correlation using a deformable mirror device: a feasibility study,” in Acousto-Optic, Electro-Optic, and Magneto-Optic Devices and Applications, J. A. Lucero, ed., Proc. SPIE753, 72–81 (1987). [CrossRef]
  4. B. D. Bock, T. A. Crow, M. K. Giles, “Design considerations for miniature optical correlation systems that use pixelated input and filter transducers,” in Optical Information Processing Systems and Architectures II, B. Javidi, ed., Proc. SPIE1347, 297–309 (1990). [CrossRef]
  5. P. D. Gianino, C. L. Woods, “Effects of spatial light modulator opaque dead zones on optical correlation,” Appl. Opt. 31, 4025–4033 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. P. D. Gianino, C. L. Woods, “General treatment of spatial light modulator dead-zone effects on optical correlation. II. Mathematical analysis,” Appl. Opt. 32, 6536–6541 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. A. Davis, E. A. Merrill, D. M. Cottrell, R. M. Bunch, “Effects of sampling and binarization in the output of the joint Fourier transform correlator,” Opt. Eng. 29, 1094–1100 (1990). [CrossRef]
  8. J. A. Trezza, J. S. Harris, “Creation and optimization of vertical cavity phase flip modulators,” J. Appl. Phys. 75, 4878–4884 (1994). [CrossRef]
  9. J. A. Trezza, J. S. Harris, “Two-state electrically controllable phase diffraction grating using arrays of vertical-cavity phase flip modulators,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 8, 1211–1213 (1996). [CrossRef]
  10. E. Serrano, M. P. Y. Desmulliez, S. M. Prince, H. Inbar, B. S. Wherrett, “Multiple-quantum-well binary-phase modulators: design and tolerance analysis,” in Spatial Light Modulators, Vol. 14 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington D.C., 1997), pp. 125–127.
  11. L. C. Wilkinson, S. M. Prince, M. P. Y. Desmulliez, C. R. Stanley, “Fabrication and testing of a multiple quantum well binary phase modulator,” in Spatial Light Modulators, Vol. 14 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington D.C., 1997), pp. 114–116.
  12. A. Jennings, P. Horan, B. Kelly, J. Hegarty, “Asymmetric Fabry–Perot device arrays with low insertion loss and high uniformity,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 4, 858–860 (1992). [CrossRef]
  13. N. McArdle, M. R. Taghizadeh, “Real-time reconfigurable interconnections for parallel optical processing,” Opt. Rev. 2, 189–193 (1995). [CrossRef]
  14. R. Petit, ed., Electromagnetic Theory of Gratings (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980). [CrossRef]
  15. D. A. Pommet, M. G. Moharam, E. B. Grann, “Limits of scalar diffraction theory for diffractive phase elements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1827–1834 (1994). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited