OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 38, Iss. 20 — Jul. 10, 1999
  • pp: 4325–4332

Comparison of direct blind deconvolution methods for motion-blurred images

Yitzhak Yitzhaky, Ruslan Milberg, Sergei Yohaev, and Norman S. Kopeika  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 38, Issue 20, pp. 4325-4332 (1999)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (3843 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Direct methods for restoration of images blurred by motion are analyzed and compared. The term direct means that the considered methods are performed in a one-step fashion without any iterative technique. The blurring point-spread function is assumed to be unknown, and therefore the image restoration process is called blind deconvolution. What is believed to be a new direct method, here called the whitening method, was recently developed. This method and other existing direct methods such as the homomorphic and the cepstral techniques are studied and compared for a variety of motion types. Various criteria such as quality of restoration, sensitivity to noise, and computation requirements are considered. It appears that the recently developed method shows some improvements over other older methods. The research presented here clarifies the differences among the direct methods and offers an experimental basis for choosing which blind deconvolution method to use. In addition, some improvements on the methods are suggested.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.0100) Image processing : Image processing
(100.1830) Image processing : Deconvolution
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(110.4850) Imaging systems : Optical transfer functions

Original Manuscript: November 17, 1998
Revised Manuscript: March 25, 1999
Published: July 10, 1999

Yitzhak Yitzhaky, Ruslan Milberg, Sergei Yohaev, and Norman S. Kopeika, "Comparison of direct blind deconvolution methods for motion-blurred images," Appl. Opt. 38, 4325-4332 (1999)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. N. S. Kopeika, A System Engineering Approach to Imaging (SPIE Press, Bellingham, Wash., 1998).
  2. Y. Yitzhaky, N. S. Kopeika, “Identification of blur parameters from motion blurred images,” CVGIP. Graph. Models Image Process. 59, 321–332 (1997).
  3. S. C. Som, “Analysis of the effect of linear smear on photographic images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 859–864 (1971). [CrossRef]
  4. O. Hadar, S. R. Rotman, N. S. Kopeika, “Target acquisition modeling of forward-motion considerations for airborne reconnaissance over hostile territory,” Opt. Eng. 33, 3106–3117 (1994). [CrossRef]
  5. O. Hadar, I. Dror, N. S. Kopeika, “Image resolution limits resulting from mechanical vibrations, part IV: real-time numerical calculation of optical transfer function and experimental verification,” Opt. Eng. 33, 566–578 (1994). [CrossRef]
  6. A. Rosenfeld, A. C. Kak, Digital Picture Processing (Academic, New York, 1982), Vol. 1.
  7. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989).
  8. L. J. Harris, “Image evaluation and restoration,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 569–574 (1966). [CrossRef]
  9. D. Slepian, “Restoration of photographs blurred by image motion,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 46, 2353–2362 (1967). [CrossRef]
  10. M. M. Sondhi, “Image restoration: the removal of spatially invariant degradations,” Proc. IEEE 60, 842–853 (1972). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Cannon, “Blind deconvolution of spatially invariant image blurs with phase,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-24, (1976).
  12. A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, T. G. Stockham, “Nonlinear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals,” Proc. IEEE 56, 1268–1291 (1968). [CrossRef]
  13. E. Cole, “The removal of unknown image blurs by homomorphic filtering,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1973).
  14. T. G. Stockham, T. M. Cannon, R. B. Ingebretsen, “Blind deconvolution through digital signal processing,” Proc. IEEE 63, 678–692 (1975). [CrossRef]
  15. M. Kunt, Digital Signal Processing (Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1986), Chap. 7.
  16. B. R. Frieden, “Restoring with maximum likelihood and maximum entropy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 511–518 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. S. J. Wernecke, L. R. D’addario, “Maximum entropy image reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Comput. C-26, 351–364 (1977). [CrossRef]
  18. M. I. Sezan, A. M. Teklap, “Survey of recent developments in digital image restoration,” Opt. Eng. 29, 393–404 (1990). [CrossRef]
  19. R. L. Lagendijk, A. M. Tekalp, J. Biemond, “Maximum likelihood image and blur identification: a unifying approach,” Opt. Eng. 29, 422–435 (1990). [CrossRef]
  20. A. K. Katsaggelos, ed., Digital Image Restoration (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991). [CrossRef]
  21. G. Pavlovic, A. M. Tekalp, “Maximum likelihood parametric blur identification based on a continuous spatial domain model,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1, 496–504 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Y. Yitzhaky, I. Mor, A. Lantzman, N. S. Kopeika, “A direct method for restoration of motion blurred images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1512–1519 (1998). [CrossRef]
  23. A. E. Savakis, H. J. Trussell, “Blur identification by residual spectral matching,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2, 141–151 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited