OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 39, Iss. 11 — Apr. 10, 2000
  • pp: 1681–1699

Communicating with waves between volumes: evaluating orthogonal spatial channels and limits on coupling strengths

David A. B. Miller  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 39, Issue 11, pp. 1681-1699 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.001681


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (358 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A rigorous method for finding the best-connected orthogonal communication channels, modes, or degrees of freedom for scalar waves between two volumes of arbitrary shape and position is derived explicitly without assuming planar surfaces or paraxial approximations. The communication channels are the solutions of two eigenvalue problems and are identical to the cavity modes of a double phase-conjugate resonator. A sum rule for the connection strengths is also derived, the sum being a simple volume integral. These results are used to analyze rectangular prism volumes, small volumes, thin volumes in different relative orientations, and arbitrary near-field volumes: all situations in which previous planar approaches have failed for one or more reasons. Previous planar results are reproduced explicitly, extending them to finite depth. Depth is shown not to increase the number of communications modes unless the volumes are close when compared with their depths. How to estimate the connection strengths in some cases without a full solution of the eigenvalue problem is discussed so that estimates of the number of usable communications modes can be made from the sum rule. In general, the approach gives a rigorous basis for handling problems related to volume sources and receivers. It may be especially applicable in near-field problems and in situations in which volume is an intrinsic part of the problem.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.2990) Imaging systems : Image formation theory
(260.1960) Physical optics : Diffraction theory

History
Original Manuscript: June 9, 1999
Revised Manuscript: October 6, 1999
Published: April 10, 2000

Citation
David A. B. Miller, "Communicating with waves between volumes: evaluating orthogonal spatial channels and limits on coupling strengths," Appl. Opt. 39, 1681-1699 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-39-11-1681


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. I previously have briefly presented the derivation of the communications modes and the sum rule in D. A. B. Miller, “Spatial channels for communicating with waves between volumes,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1645–1647 (1998), and in summary form in D. A. B. Miller, “Communicating with waves between volumes—how many different spatial channels are there?” in Optics in Computing ’98, P. Chavel, D. A. B. Miller, H. Thienpont, eds., Proc. SPIE3490, 111–114 (1998).
  2. R. Piestun, D. A. B. Miller, “Degrees of freedom of an electromagnetic wave,” in Eighteenth Congress of the International Commission for Optics, A. J. Glass, J. W. Goodman, M. Chang, A. H. Guenther, T. Asakura, eds., Proc. SPIE3749, 110–111 (1999); R. Piestun, D. A. B. Miller, “Electromagnetic degrees of freedom of an optical system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (to be published). [CrossRef]
  3. D. Gabor, “Light and information,” in Progress in Optics, Vol. 1, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1961), pp. 109–153. [CrossRef]
  4. G. Toraldo di Francia, “Resolving power and information,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 497–501 (1955). [CrossRef]
  5. G. Toraldo di Francia, “Directivity, supergain, and information,” Trans. IRE 4, 473–478 (1956).
  6. A. Walther, “Gabor’s theorem and energy transfer through lenses,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 639–644 (1967). [CrossRef]
  7. I omit here for simplicity the two distinct phases and, in the case of light, the two distinct polarizations, the effects of each of which can be viewed as doubling the number of degrees of freedom.
  8. G. Toraldo di Francia, “Degrees of freedom of an image,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 799–804 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. C. W. Barnes, “Object restoration in a diffraction-limited imaging system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 575–578 (1966). [CrossRef]
  10. B. R. Frieden, “Evaluation, design, and extrapolation methods for optical signals, based on the use of the prolate functions,” in Progress in Optics IX, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1971), pp. 311–407. [CrossRef]
  11. F. Gori, G. Guattari, “Shannon number and degrees of freedom of an image,” Opt. Commun. 7, 163–165 (1973). [CrossRef]
  12. F. Gori, G. Guattari, “Degrees of freedom of images from point-like-element pupils,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 453–458 (1974). [CrossRef]
  13. L. Ronchi, A. Consortini, “Degrees of freedom of images in coherent and incoherent illumination,” Alta Frequenza 43, 1034–1036 (1974).
  14. M. Bendinelli, A. Consortini, L. Ronchi, B. R. Frieden, “Degrees of freedom and eigenfunctions for the noisy image,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 1498–1502 (1974). [CrossRef]
  15. D. Slepian, H. O. Pollak, “Prolate spheroidal wave function, Fourier analysis and uncertainty—I,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 40, 43–63 (1961). [CrossRef]
  16. J. H. Shapiro, “Optimal power transfer through atmospheric turbulence using state knowledge,” IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol. COM-19, 410–414 (1971). [CrossRef]
  17. J. H. Shapiro, “Normal-mode approach to wave propagation in the turbulent atmosphere,” Appl. Opt. 13, 2614–2619 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. H. Shapiro, “Imaging and optical communication through atmospheric turbulence,” in Laser Beam Propagation in the Atmosphere, J. W. Strohbehn, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978), pp. 171–222. [CrossRef]
  19. D. A. B. Miller, “Huygens’s wave propagation principle corrected,” Opt. Lett. 16, 1370–1372 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. See, for example, D. Porter, D. S. G. Stirling, Integral Equations (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1990), for a discussion of these issues.
  21. R. Courant, D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics (Wiley, New York, 1989).
  22. C. Flammer, Spheroidal Wave Functions (Stanford U. Press, Stanford, Calif., 1957).
  23. T. A. Beu, R. I. Câmpeanu, “Prolate radial spheroidal wave functions,” Comp. Phys. Commun. 30, 177–185 (1983). [CrossRef]
  24. T. A. Beu, R. I. Câmpeanu, “Prolate angular spheroidal wave functions,” Comp. Phys. Commun. 30, 187–192 (1983). [CrossRef]
  25. The phase-conjugate cavity discussed here has two phase-conjugating mirrors. This configuration differs from the situation with one phase-conjugating mirror and one conventional mirror that is more extensively discussed in the literature. The case with two phase-conjugate mirrors is briefly discussed in, for example, J. F. Lam, W. P. Brown, “Optical resonators with phase-conjugate mirrors,” Opt. Lett. 2, 61–63 (1980).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited