OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 39, Iss. 17 — Jun. 10, 2000
  • pp: 2948–2958

Model-based resolution: applying the theory in quantitative microscopy

Andrés Santos and Ian T. Young  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 39, Issue 17, pp. 2948-2958 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.002948


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (255 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Model-based image processing techniques have been proposed as a way to increase the resolution of optical microscopes. Here a model based on the microscope’s point-spread function is analyzed, and the resolution limits achieved with a proposed goodness-of-fit criterion are quantified. Several experiments were performed to evaluate the possibilities and limitations of this method: (a) experiments with an ideal (diffraction-limited) microscope, (b) experiments with simulated dots and a real microscope, and (c) experiments with real dots acquired with a real microscope. The results show that a threefold increase over classical resolution (e.g., Rayleigh) is possible. These results can be affected by model misspecifications, whereas model corruption, as seen in the effect of Poisson noise, seems to be unimportant. This research can be considered to be preliminary with the final goal being the accurate measurement of various cytogenetic properties, such as gene distributions, in labeled preparations.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2960) Image processing : Image analysis
(100.6640) Image processing : Superresolution
(110.0180) Imaging systems : Microscopy
(110.4280) Imaging systems : Noise in imaging systems
(120.4640) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optical instruments
(170.2520) Medical optics and biotechnology : Fluorescence microscopy

History
Original Manuscript: April 19, 1999
Revised Manuscript: March 24, 2000
Published: June 10, 2000

Citation
Andrés Santos and Ian T. Young, "Model-based resolution: applying the theory in quantitative microscopy," Appl. Opt. 39, 2948-2958 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-39-17-2948


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. Dietzel, E. Weilandt, R. Eils, C. Münkel, C. Cremer, T. Cremer, “Three-dimensional distribution of centromeric or paracentromeric heterochromatin of chromosomes 1, 7, 15 and 17 in human lymphocyte nuclei studied with light microscopic axial tomography,” Bioimaging 3, 121–133 (1995). [CrossRef]
  2. A. Van den Bos, “Ultimate resolution: a mathematical framework,” Ultramicroscopy 47, 298–306 (1992). [CrossRef]
  3. A. J. den Dekker, A. Van den Bos, “Resolution: a survey,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 547–557 (1997). [CrossRef]
  4. H. Netten, I. T. Young, L. J. van Vliet, H. J. Tanke, H. Vrolijk, W. C. R. Sloos, “FISH and chips: automation of fluorescent dot counting in interphase cell nuclei,” Cytometry 28, 1–10 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. H. Netten, L. J. van Vliet, H. Vrolijk, W. C. R. Sloos, H. J. Tanke, I. T. Young, “Fluorescent dot counting in interphase cell nuclei,” Bioimaging 4, 93–106 (1996). [CrossRef]
  6. C. Ortiz de Solórzano, A. Santos, I. Vallcorba, J. M. García-Sagredo, F. del Pozo, ”Automated FISH spot counting in interphase nuclei: statistical validation and data correction,” Cytometry 31, 93–99 (1998).
  7. L. J. van Vliet, P. W. Verbeek, “Better geometric measurements based on photometric information,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, S. Okamura, T. Nemoto, S. Fujimura, K. Watanabe, eds. (IEEE, New York, 1994), pp. 1357–1360.
  8. A. J. den Dekker, “Model-based resolution,” Ph.D. dissertation in Applied Physics (Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1997).
  9. W. F. Maddams, “The scope and limitations of curve fitting,” Appl. Spectrosc. 34, 245–267 (1980). [CrossRef]
  10. A. Klein, R. van den Doel, I. T. Young, S. Ellenberger, L. J. van Vliet, “Quantitative evaluation and comparison of light microscopes,” in Optical Investigation of Cells In Vitro and In Vivo, D. L. Farkas, R. C. Leif, B. J. Tromberg, eds., Proc. SPIE3260, 162–173 (1998).
  11. H. Netten, “Automated image analysis of FISH-stained cell nuclei,” Ph.D. dissertation (Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1997).
  12. P. M. Nederlof, S. van der Flier, A. K. Raap, H. J. Tanke, “Quantification of inter- and intra-nuclear variation of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals,” Cytometry 13, 831–838 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited