OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 39, Iss. 19 — Jul. 1, 2000
  • pp: 3209–3215

Multifocal planes head-mounted displays

Jannick P. Rolland, Myron W. Krueger, and Alexei Goon  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 39, Issue 19, pp. 3209-3215 (2000)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (103 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Stereoscopic head-mounted displays (HMD’s) provide an effective capability to create dynamic virtual environments. For a user of such environments, virtual objects would be displayed ideally at the appropriate distances, and natural concordant accommodation and convergence would be provided. Under such image display conditions, the user perceives these objects as if they were objects in a real environment. Current HMD technology requires convergent eye movements. However, it is currently limited by fixed visual accommodation, which is inconsistent with real-world vision. A prototype multiplanar volumetric projection display based on a stack of laminated planes was built for medical visualization as discussed in a paper presented at a 1999 Advanced Research Projects Agency workshop (Sullivan, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, Va., 1999). We show how such technology can be engineered to create a set of virtual planes appropriately configured in visual space to suppress conflicts of convergence and accommodation in HMD’s. Although some scanning mechanism could be employed to create a set of desirable planes from a two-dimensional conventional display, multiplanar technology accomplishes such function with no moving parts. Based on optical principles and human vision, we present a comprehensive investigation of the engineering specification of multiplanar technology for integration in HMD’s. Using selected human visual acuity and stereoacuity criteria, we show that the display requires at most 27 equally spaced planes, which is within the capability of current research and development display devices, located within a maximal 26-mm-wide stack. We further show that the necessary in-plane resolution is of the order of 5 µm.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.0080) Geometric optics : Geometric optics
(120.2040) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Displays
(120.2820) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Heads-up displays
(120.4640) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optical instruments
(230.3990) Optical devices : Micro-optical devices
(350.4600) Other areas of optics : Optical engineering

Original Manuscript: July 27, 1999
Revised Manuscript: February 25, 2000
Published: July 1, 2000

Jannick P. Rolland, Myron W. Krueger, and Alexei Goon, "Multifocal planes head-mounted displays," Appl. Opt. 39, 3209-3215 (2000)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. D. F. Kocian, “Design considerations for virtual panoramic display (VPD) helmet systems,” Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Visual Display Systems Branch (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, 1988).
  2. M. L. Thomas, R. Robinson, W. P. Siegmund, S. E. Antos, “Fiber optic development for use on the fiber optic helmet-mounted display,” Opt. Eng. 29, 855–862 (1990). [CrossRef]
  3. A. Arditi, “Binocular vision,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1986), Chap. 23, p. 32.
  4. J. Siderov, R. S. Harwerth, “Precision of stereoscopic depth perception from double images,” Vision Res. 33, 1553–1560 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. C. Roumes, J. Plantier, J. P. Menu, “L’avenir est-il au visual de casque binoculaire?” in AGARD CP 517 (Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Paris, France, 1992), Vol. 11, pp. 11–19.
  6. J. Wann, S. Rushton, M. Mon-Williams, “Natural problems in the perception of virtual environments,” Vision Res. 35, 2731–2736 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. P. Rolland, W. Gibson, D. Ariely, “Towards quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments,” Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 4(1), 24–29 (1995).
  8. W. Robinett, J. P. Rolland, “A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display,” Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(1), 45–62 (1992).
  9. E. Peli, “Real vision and virtual reality,” Opt. Photon. News, July1995, pp. 28–34.
  10. M. Mon-Williams, J. P. Wann, S. Rushton, “Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of head-mounted displays,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 13, 387–391 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. W. C. Gogel, J. D. Tietz, “Relative cues and absolute distance perception,” Percept. and Psychophys. 28, 321–328 (1980). [CrossRef]
  12. H. A. Sedgwick, “Space perception,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1986), Chap. 4, p. 6.
  13. J. Foley, A. vanDam, S. Feiner, J. Hughes, Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990).
  14. J. P. Rolland, A. Yoshida, L. Davis, J. H. Reif, “High-resolution inset head-mounted display,” Appl. Opt. 37, 4183–4193 (1998). [CrossRef]
  15. L. Vaissie, J. P. Rolland, “Eye-tracking integration in head-mounted displays,” U.S. patent (Filed 23December1999).
  16. J. P. Rolland, L. Vaissie, G. Bochenek, “Analysis of eyepoint locations and accuracy of rendered depth in binocular head-mounted displays,” in Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VI, J. O. Merritt, M. T. Bolas, S. S. Fisher, eds., Proc. SPIE3639A, 57–64 (1999).
  17. J. P. Wann, S. K. Rushton, M. Mon-Williams, “Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments,” Vision Res. 35, 2731–2736 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. L. Marran, C. Schor, “Multiaccommodative stimuli in VR systems: problems and solutions,” Hum. Factors 37, 382–388 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. E. Dolgoff, “Real-depth imaging,” SID Digest 28, 269–272 (1997).
  20. A. F. Crabtree, “Method and apparatus for manipulating, projecting, and displaying light in a volumetric format,” U.S. patent5,572,375 (5November1996).
  21. A. Sullivan, “Progress report on multiplanar volumetric displays,” presented at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Biomedical Computing Workshop, Innovative Modeling & Advanced Generation of Environments Conference, Scottsdale, Ariz., 14–18 July 1997.
  22. J. D. Lewis, C. M. Verber, R. B. MacGhee, “A true three-dimensional display,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 18, 724–732 (1971). [CrossRef]
  23. E. Downing, L. Hesselink, J. Ralston, R. Macfarlane, “A three-color, solid-state, three-dimensional display,” Science 273, 1185–1189 (1996). [CrossRef]
  24. I. I. Kim, E. Korevar, H. Hakakha, “Three-dimensional volumetric display in rubidium vapor,” in Projection Displays II, M. H. Wu, ed., Proc. SPIE2650, 274–284 (1996). [CrossRef]
  25. A. Sullivan, “Multiplanar volumetric displays for medical visualization,” presented at Medicine Meets Virtual Reality ’99, Advanced Research Projects Agency Workshop, San Francisco, 20 Jan. 1999.
  26. R. W. Reading, Binocular Vision: Foundations and Applications (Butterworths, London, 1983), pp. 110–128.
  27. A. Lit, J. P. Finn, “Variability of depth-discrimination thresholds as a function of observation distance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 66, 740–742 (1976). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited