OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 39, Iss. 22 — Aug. 1, 2000
  • pp: 3963–3967

Anamorphic concentration of solar radiation beyond the one-dimensional thermodynamic limit

Nir Davidson, Lev Khaykovich, and Erez Hasman  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 39, Issue 22, pp. 3963-3967 (2000)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (236 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We propose and demonstrate a new scheme for anamorphic concentration of a big (40 cm × 40 cm) diffuse light source to achieve an extremely high concentration in one lateral direction at the expense of that in the other direction, to preserve the total (two-dimensional) optical brightness. Such anamorphic concentration is achieved by a combination of two conventional two-dimensional concentrators and a properly designed retroreflector array. Our experiments in search of a diffuse white-light source with properties comparable with those of solar radiation have yielded 28-fold improvement of the one-dimensional concentration ratio compared with those of conventional concentrators and 14-fold improvement compared with the one-dimensional thermodynamic limit.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.2740) Geometric optics : Geometric optical design
(220.1770) Optical design and fabrication : Concentrators
(230.6080) Optical devices : Sources
(350.6050) Other areas of optics : Solar energy

Original Manuscript: January 3, 2000
Revised Manuscript: March 20, 2000
Published: August 1, 2000

Nir Davidson, Lev Khaykovich, and Erez Hasman, "Anamorphic concentration of solar radiation beyond the one-dimensional thermodynamic limit," Appl. Opt. 39, 3963-3967 (2000)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. R. Winston, W. T. Weldford, High Collection Nonimaging Optics (Academic, New York, 1989).
  2. R. Winston, I. M. Bassett, W. T. Welford, R. Winston, “Nonimaging optics for flux concentration,” in Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989), Vol. 27, pp. 161–226.
  3. I. Pe’er, N. Naftali, A. Yogev, “High-power solar-pumped Nd:YAG laser amplifier for free-space laser communication,” in Nonimaging Optics: Maximum Efficiency Light Transfer IV, R. Winston, ed. Proc. SPIE3139, 194–204 (1997).
  4. E. Hasman, S. Keren, N. Davidson, A. A. Friesem, “Three-dimensional optical metrology with color-coded extended depth of focus,” Opt. Lett. 24, 439–441 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. N. Davidson, L. Khaykovich, E. Hasman, “High-resolution spectrometers for diffuse light using anamorphic concentration,” Opt. Lett. 24, 1835–1837 (1999). [CrossRef]
  6. Th. Graf, J. E. Balmer, “High-power Nd:YLF laser end pumped by a diode-laser bar,” Opt. Lett. 18, 1317–1319 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. R. Leger, W. C. Goltsos, “Geometric transformation of linear diode-laser arrays for longitudinal pumping of solid state lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28, 1088–1100 (1992). [CrossRef]
  8. N. Davidson, A. A. Friesem, “Concentration and collimation of diffuse linear light source,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 334–336 (1993). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Yamaguchi, T. Kobayashi, Y. Saito, K. Chiba, “Collimation of emissions from a high-power multistripe laser-diode bar with multiprism array coupling and focusing to a small spot,” Opt. Lett. 20, 898–900 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. B. Ehlers, K. Du, M. Baumann, H.-G. Treusch, P. Loosen, R. Poprawe, “Beam shaping and fiber coupling of high-power diode laser arrays,” in Lasers in Material Processing, L. H. Beckmann, ed., Proc. SPIE3097, 639–644 (1997). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Baumann, B. Ehlers, M. Quade, K. Du, H.-G. Treusch, P. Loosen, R. Poprawe, “Compact fiber-coupled high-power diode-laser unit,” in Lasers in Material Processing, L. H. Beckmann, ed., Proc. SPIE3097, 712–716 (1997). [CrossRef]
  12. To simplify the notation, we discuss the special case when DX1 = DY1 and αX1 = αY1. The procedure is applicable also to the general case DX1 ≠ DY1 or αX1 ≠ αY1.
  13. Our procedure can be readily extended for broader optimization criteria when the flux concentration can be increased in exchange for a small sacrifice in collection efficiency. This would lead to higher optimal values for the numerical aperture of the PM, depending on the exact trade-off between concentration and efficiency.
  14. Because the actual X width of the beam at the RR plane was measured to be 8.4 mm (FWHM), slightly larger than the theoretical value, we used a 10-mm size for each RR to reduce clipping losses to <2%. This yielded an increase in the beam X size to 10 mm on retroreflection.
  15. M. Brunotte, A. Goetzberger, U. Blieske, “Two-stage concentrator permitting concentration factors up to 300× with one-axis tracing,” Solar Energy 56, 285–300 (1996). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 4 Fig. 5

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited