OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 39, Iss. 23 — Aug. 10, 2000
  • pp: 4080–4097

All-Digital Ring–Wedge Detector Applied to Image Quality Assessment

David M. Berfanger and Nicholas George  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 39, Issue 23, pp. 4080-4097 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.39.004080


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (841 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In the automatic assessment of image quality we obtained a high accuracy in the classification of image degradations in a manner that is widely independent of scene content. Using an all-digital ring–wedge detector system combined with neural-network software, we conducted several experiments in which the end goal is to classify images according to numerical quality scales. Experiments are presented to stress the importance of both local and global image quality assessment. Two databases of degraded images were prepared. One uses five levels of Gaussian blur to simulate depth of field. The other was prepared with lossy compression and recovery with artifacts generated by a JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) compression algorithm. In quantitative terms our best sorting of Gaussian blur without knowledge of the original scene was to an accuracy of 96%. For degradation using JPEG we obtained an accuracy of 95% without knowledge of the original and 98% when the original scene is available as a reference.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(070.2590) Fourier optics and signal processing : ABCD transforms
(070.5010) Fourier optics and signal processing : Pattern recognition
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(110.3000) Imaging systems : Image quality assessment
(200.4260) Optics in computing : Neural networks

Citation
David M. Berfanger and Nicholas George, "All-Digital Ring–Wedge Detector Applied to Image Quality Assessment," Appl. Opt. 39, 4080-4097 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-39-23-4080


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. M. P. Eckert and A. P. Bradley, “Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression,” Signal. Process. 70, 177–200 (1998).
  2. N. Belaid, J. Cespedes, J. M. Thijssen, and J. Ophir, “Lesion detection in simulated elastographic and echographic images: a psychophysical study,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 20, 877–891 (1994).
  3. C. Y. Wen and R. J. Beaton, “Subjective image quality evaluation of image compression techniques,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40th Annual Meeting 1996 (Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1996), Vol. 2, pp. 1188–1192.
  4. S. J. Briggs, “The definition and measurement of image quality,” in Advances in Image Transmission II, A. G. Tescher, ed., Proc. SPIE 249, 170–174 (1980).
  5. T. L. Coluccio, S. MacLeod, and J. J. Maier, “Effect of image contrast and resolution on photointerpreter target detection and identification,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1478–1481 (1969).
  6. G. L. Latshaw, P. L. Zuzelo, and S. J. Briggs, “Tactical photointerpreter evaluations of hardcopy and softcopy imagery,” in Airborne Reconnaissance III: Collection and Exploitation of Reconnaissance Data, J. H. Smith and T. C. Freitag, eds., Proc. SPIE 137, 179–87 (1978).
  7. H. L. Snyder, M. E. Maddox, D. I. Shedivy, J. A. Turpin, J. J. Burke, and R. N. Strickland, “Digital image quality and interpretability: database and hardcopy studies,” Opt. Eng. 21, 14–22 (1982).
  8. J. J. Burke and H. L. Snyder, “Quality metrics of digitally derived imagery and their relation to interpreter performance,” in Image Quality, P. S. Cheatham, ed., Proc. SPIE 310, 16–23 (1981).
  9. B. P. Chao, R. J. Beaton, and H. L. Snyder, “Human performance evaluations of digital image quality,” in Advances in Display Technology III, E. Schlam, ed., Proc. SPIE 386, 20–24 (1983).
  10. J. H. D. M. Westerink and J. A. J. Roufs, “Subjective image quality as a function of viewing distance, resolution, and picture size,” J. Soc. Motion Pict. Tel. Eng. 98, 113–119 (1989).
  11. S. Ohtsuka and M. Kosugi, “Quality evaluation of locally impaired pictures,” J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 32, 19–24 (1991).
  12. R. Hamberg and H. de Ridder, “Continuous assessment of time-varying image quality,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II, B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas, eds., Proc. SPIE 3016, 248–259 (1997).
  13. V. Kayargadde and J.-B. Martens, “Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: experiments,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1166–1177 (1996).
  14. J. A. J. Roufs, “Perceptual image quality: concept and measurement,” Philips J. Res. 47, 35–62 (1992).
  15. J. A. J. Roufs and M. C. Boschman, “Methods for evaluating the perceptual quality of VDUs,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging: Models, Methods, and Applications, B. E. Rogowitz and J. P. Allebached, eds., Proc. SPIE 1249, 2–11 (1990).
  16. E. H. Linfoot, “Transmission factors and optical design,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 740–752 (1956).
  17. E. H. Linfoot, Fourier Methods in Optical Image Evaluation (Focal Press, London, 1964).
  18. O. H. Schade, “Image gradiation, graininess and sharpness in television and motion-picture systems. Part I. image structure and transfer characteristics,” J. Soc. Motion Pict. Tel. Eng. 56, 137–177 (1951).
  19. O. H. Schade, “Image gradiation, graininess and sharpness in television and motion-picture systems. Part II. The trainstructure of motion picture images—an analysis of deviations and fluctuations of the sample number,” J. Soc. Motion Pict. Tel. Eng. 58, 181–222 (1952).
  20. O. H. Schade, “Image gradiation, graininess and sharpness in television and motion-picture systems. Part III. The grain structure of television images,” J. Soc. Motion Pict. Tel. Eng. 61, 97–164 (1953).
  21. O. H. Schade, “Image gradiation, graininess and sharpness in television and motion-picture systems. Part IV. Image analysis in photographic and television systems (definition and sharpness),” J. Soc. Motion Pict. Tel. Eng. 64, 593–617 (1955).
  22. O. H. Schade, “An evaluation of photographic image quality and resolving power,” J. Soc. Motion Pict. Tel. Eng. 73, 81–119 (1964).
  23. R. Shaw, “Evaluating the efficient of imaging processes,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1103–1155 (1978).
  24. W. B. Wetherell, “The calculation of image quality,” in Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, R. Kingslake, ed. (Academic, New York, 1980), Vol. VIII, pp. 171–312.
  25. N. George, “Image quality rating system,” U.S. patent 3,788,749 (29 January 1974).
  26. N. George, J. T. Thomasson, and A. Spindel, “Photodetector light pattern detector,” U.S. patent 3,689,772 (5 September 1972).
  27. N. Jensen, “High-speed image analysis techniques,” Photograph. Eng. 39, 1321–1328 (1973).
  28. N. Jensen, Optical and Photographic Reconnaissance Systems (Wiley, New York, 1968), Chap. 8, pp. 102–115.
  29. N. B. Nill, “Scene power spectra: the moment as an image quality merit factor,” Appl. Opt. 15, 2846–2854 (1976).
  30. A. G. Tescher and J. R. Parsons, “Cross-spectrum error criterion as an image quality measure,” Appl. Opt. 13, 1460–1465 (1974).
  31. T. P. Barnwell III and R. M. Mersereau, “A comparison of some subjective and objective measures for image quality,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Asilomar Conference on Circuits Systems and Computers (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1978), pp. 96–100.
  32. R. A. Schindler, “Physical measures of image quality and their relationship to performance,” in Advances in Display Technology, J. R. Parsons, ed., Proc. SPIE 199, 117–125 (1979).
  33. P. G. J. Barten, “Evaluation of subjective image quality with the square-root integral method,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 2024–2031 (1990).
  34. N. B. Nill and B. H. Bouzas, “Objective image quality measure derived from digital image power spectra,” Opt. Eng. 31, 813–825 (1992).
  35. J. A. Saghri, P. S. Cheatham, and A. Habibi, “Image quality measure based on a human visual system model,” Opt. Eng. 28, 813–818 (1989).
  36. T. A. Grogan and D. Keene, “Image quality evaluation with a contour-based perceptual model,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1666, 188–197 (1992).
  37. I. R. L. Davies, D. Rose, and R. J. Smith, “Automated image quality assessment,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, J. P. Allebach and B. E. Rogowitz, eds., Proc. SPIE 1913, 27–36 (1993).
  38. S. Daly, “The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1666, 2–14 (1992).
  39. H. L. Snyder, “Image quality: measures and visual performance,” in Flat Panel Displays and CRT’s, L. E. Tannas, Jr., ed. (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1980), pp 70–90.
  40. I. Overington, “Image quality and observer performance,” in Image Quality, P. S. Cheatham, ed., Proc. SPIE 310, 2–9 (1981).
  41. N. Jayant, J. Johnston, and R. Safranek, “Signal compression based on models of human perception,” Proc. IEEE 81, 1385–422 (1993).
  42. C. K. Abbey, H. H. Barrett, and M. P. Eckstein, “Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers,” in Medical Imaging 1997. Physics of Medical Imaging, R. L. Van Metter and J. Beutel, eds., Proc. SPIE 3032, 182–194 (1997).
  43. A. B. Watson, “The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images,” Comput. Vision, Graph. Image Process. 39, 311–27 (1987).
  44. A. B. Watson, “Efficiency of a model human image code,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2401–2417 (1987).
  45. C. C. Taylor, Z. Pizlo, J. P. Allebach, and C. A. Bouman, “Image quality assessment with a Gabor pyramid model of the human visual system,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II, B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas, eds., Proc. SPIE 3016, 58–69 (1997).
  46. D. Berfanger and N. George, “All-digital ring-wedge detector applied to fingerprint recognition,” Appl. Opt. 38, 357–369 (1999).
  47. Joint Photographic Experts Group Compact Disc, “Information technology—digital compression and coding of continuous-tone still images,” International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission Standard (available through American National Standards Institute web site, http://www.ansi.org). ISO/IEC 10918–1:1994.
  48. C.-H. Chou and Y.-C. Li, “A perceptually tuned subband image coder based on the measure of just-noticeable-distortion profile,” IEEE. Trans. Circuits Syst. V 5, 467–476 (1995).
  49. T. Eude and H. Cherifi, “Quality metrics for low bitrate coding,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II, B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas, eds., Proc. SPIE 3016, 70–81 (1997).
  50. N. George, S.-G. Wang, and D. L. Venable, “Pattern recognition using the ring-wedge photodetector and neural-network software,” in Optical Pattern Recognition II, H. J. Caufield, ed., Proc. SPIE 1134, 96–106 (1989).
  51. H. Kusaka, “Consideration of vision and picture quality: psychological effects induced by picture sharpness,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1077, 50–55 (1989).
  52. V. Kayargadde and J.-B. Martens, “Estimation of perceived image blur using edge features,” Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 7, 102–109 (1996).
  53. D. L. Venable, “Pattern classification using diffraction pattern sampling and the limitations due to film grain noise,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., 1989).
  54. D. M. Berfanger and N. George, “Automatic image quality assessment,” in Proceedings of ICPS ’94: The Physics and Chemistry of Imaging Systems, IS&T’s 47th Annual Conference (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Springfield, Va., 1994), Vol 2, pp. 436–438.
  55. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989), pp. 244–255.
  56. A. A. Webster, C. T. Jones, M. H. Pinson, S. D. Voran, and S. Wolf, “An objective video quality assessment system based on human perception,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, J. P. Allebach and B. E. Rogowitz, eds., Proc. SPIE 1913, 15–26 (1993).
  57. A. B. Watson, “DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, J. P. Allebach and B. E. Rogowitz, eds., Proc. SPIE 1913, 202–216 (1993).
  58. D. R. Fuhrmann, J. A. Baro, and J. R. Cox, Jr., “Experimental evaluation of psychophysical distortion metrics for JPEG-encoded images,” J. Electron. Imaging 4, 397–406 (1995).
  59. G. K. Wallace, “The JPEG still picture compression standard,” Commun. ACM 34, 30–44 (1991).
  60. S. Ohtsuka and M. Kosugi, “Quality evaluation of locally impaired pictures,” J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 32, 19–24 (1991).
  61. C. Allen and R. Schindler, “Determining image quality from electronic or digital signal characteristics,” in Advances in Image Transmission II, A. G. Tescher, ed., Proc. SPIE 249, 179–184 (1980).
  62. E. D. Hirleman, “Optimal scaling of the inverse Fraunhofer diffraction particle sizing problem: the linear system produced by quadrature,” in Optical Particle Sizing Theory and Practice, G. Gouesbet and G. Grehan, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1988).
  63. S. D. Coston and N. George, “Recovery of particle size distributions by inversion of the optical transform intensity,” Opt. Lett. 16, 1918–1920 (1991).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited