OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 40, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2001
  • pp: 71–84

Performance comparison of rectangular (four-point) and diagonal (two-point) dither in undersampled infrared focal plane array imagers

Keith Krapels, Ronald Driggers, Richard Vollmerhause, and Carl Halford  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 40, Issue 1, pp. 71-84 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.000071


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (2072 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Undersampled staring array imagers exhibit sampling artifacts. Dither is a mechanical means of raising the spatial sampling rate without increasing the number of detectors on the focal plane array. Diagonal (two-point or slant-path) dither is easier to implement than rectangular (four-point or bowtie) dither. Also, diagonal dither generates half the data rate of rectangular dither. However, diagonal dither does not sample the image as effectively as rectangular dither. The cost and complexity advantages of diagonal dither must be traded against the expectation of reduced performance. We discuss analytical and empirical predictions of the performance difference between diagonal and rectangular dither. To compare diagonal and rectangular dither empirically, a target identification (ID) experiment was performed. The visual task involved target ID among a set of 12 tactical vehicles. High-resolution (close-up) images of the targets were blurred and downsampled to produce images representative of those seen with a 320 × 240 pixel staring array sensor. The nondithered imagery was poorly sampled, and the imagery with rectangular dither was adequately sampled. The experiment compared the static target ID performance of nondithered, diagonally dithered, and rectangularly dithered sensors. Analytical and empirical results are described.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.1240) Detectors : Arrays
(110.0110) Imaging systems : Imaging systems

History
Original Manuscript: May 15, 2000
Revised Manuscript: September 14, 2000
Published: January 1, 2001

Citation
Keith Krapels, Ronald Driggers, Richard Vollmerhause, and Carl Halford, "Performance comparison of rectangular (four-point) and diagonal (two-point) dither in undersampled infrared focal plane array imagers," Appl. Opt. 40, 71-84 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-40-1-71


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. Driggers, P. Cox, T. Edwards, Introduction to Infrared and Electrooptical Systems (Artech House, Boston, 1999).
  2. J. D. Gaskill, Linear Systems, Fourier Transforms, and Optics (Wiley, New York, 1978).
  3. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  4. S. K. Park, R. Schowengerdt, M. A. Kaczynski, “Modulation-transfer function analysis for sampled-image systems,” Appl. Opt. 23, 2572–2582 (1984). [CrossRef]
  5. K. M. Hock, “Effect of oversampling in pixel arrays,” Opt. Eng. 30, 1281–1287 (1985).
  6. O. Hadar, A. Dogariu, G. D. Boreman, “Angular dependence of sampling modulation transfer function,” Appl. Opt. 36, 7210–7216 (1997). [CrossRef]
  7. O. Hadar, G. D. Boreman, “Analysis of Oversampling Requirements in Pixelated-Imager Systems,” Opt. Eng. 38, 782–785 (1999). [CrossRef]
  8. F. Houk, N. Halyo, S. Park, “Aliasing and blurring in 2D sampled imagery,” Appl. Opt. 19, 2174–2181 (1980). [CrossRef]
  9. R. H. Vollmerhausen, R. G. Driggers, B. L. O’Kane, “Influence of sampling on target recognition and identification,” Opt. Eng. 38, 763–772 (1999). [CrossRef]
  10. R. H. Vollmerhausen, R. G. Driggers, Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems, Vol. TT39 of SPIE Tutorial Texts in Optical Engineering (Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, Wash., 2000).
  11. J. D. Gaskill, Linear Systems, Fourier Transforms, and Optics (Wiley, New York, 1978), Chap. 6.
  12. I. Overington, Vision and Acquisition (Crane, Russak, & Co., New York, 1976).
  13. R. H. Vollmerhausen, R. G. Driggers, B. L. O’Kane, “Influence of sampling on target recognition and identification,” Opt. Eng. 38, 763–772 (1999). [CrossRef]
  14. R. G. Driggers, R. H. Vollmerhausen, B. L. O’Kane, “Equivalent blur as a function of spurious response of a sampled imaging system: application to character recognition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1026–1033 (1999). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited