OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 40, Iss. 12 — Apr. 20, 2001
  • pp: 2017–2023

Improved speckle statistics in coherent differential absorption lidar with in-fiber wavelength multiplexing

Kevin D. Ridley, Guy N. Pearson, and Michael Harris  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 40, Issue 12, pp. 2017-2023 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (120 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Remote detection of gaseous pollutants and other atmospheric constituents can be achieved with differential absorption lidar (DIAL) methods. The technique relies on the transmission of two or more laser wavelengths and exploits absorption features in the target gas by measuring the ratio of their detected powers to determine gas concentration. A common mode of operation is when the transmitter and receiver are collocated, and the absorption is measured over a return trip by a randomly scattering topographic target. Hence, in coherent DIAL, speckle fluctuation leads to a large uncertainty in the detected powers unless the signal is averaged over multiple correlation times, i.e., over many independent speckles. We examine a continuous-wave coherent DIAL system in which the laser wavelengths are transmitted and received by the same single-mode optical fibers. This ensures that the two wavelengths share a common spatial mode, which, for certain transmitter and target parameters, enables highly correlated speckle fluctuations to be readily achieved in practice. For a DIAL system, this gives the potential for improved accuracy in a given observation time. A theoretical analysis quantifies this benefit as a function of the degree of correlation between the two time series (which depends on wavelength separation and target depth). The results are compared with both a numerical simulation and a laboratory-based experiment.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors
(280.1120) Remote sensing and sensors : Air pollution monitoring
(280.1910) Remote sensing and sensors : DIAL, differential absorption lidar
(280.3640) Remote sensing and sensors : Lidar

Original Manuscript: July 14, 2000
Revised Manuscript: November 22, 2000
Published: April 20, 2001

Kevin D. Ridley, Guy N. Pearson, and Michael Harris, "Improved speckle statistics in coherent differential absorption lidar with in-fiber wavelength multiplexing," Appl. Opt. 40, 2017-2023 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. R. M. Measures, ed., Laser Remote Chemical Analysis, Vol. 94 of Wiley InterScience Series on Chemical Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1988).
  2. D. K. Killinger, A. Mooradian, eds., Optical and Laser Remote Sensing, Vol. 39 of Springer Series in Optical Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983). [CrossRef]
  3. E. D. Hinkley, ed., Laser Monitoring of the Atmosphere, Vol. 14 of Topics in Applied Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976). [CrossRef]
  4. V. Wulfmeyer, J. Boesenberg, “Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor profiling: assessment of accuracy, resolution, and meteorological applications,” Appl. Opt. 37, 3825–3844 (1998). [CrossRef]
  5. A. Papayannis, G. Ancellet, J. Pelon, G. Megie, “Multiwavelength lidar for ozone measurement in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere,” Appl. Opt. 29, 467–478 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. W. B. Grant, “Effect of differential spectral reflectance on DIAL measurements using topographic targets,” Appl. Opt. 21, 2390–2394 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. W. B. Grant, “Differential absorption and Raman lidar for water vapour profile measurements: a review,” Opt. Eng. 30, 40–48 (1991). [CrossRef]
  8. E. R. Murray, D. D. Powell, J. E. van der Laan, “Measurement of average atmospheric temperature using a CO2 laser radar,” Appl. Opt. 19, 1794–1797 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. B. J. Rye, “Differential absorption lidar system sensitivity with heterodyne reception,” Appl. Opt. 17, 3862–3864 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. B. J. Rye, “Power ratio estimation in incoherent backscatter lidar: heterodyne receiver with square law detector,” J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 1899–1913 (1983). [CrossRef]
  11. N. Menyuk, D. Killinger, C. R. Menyuk, “Error reduction in laser remote sensing: combined effects of cross correlation and signal averaging,” Appl. Opt. 24, 118–131 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. R. M. Hardesty, “Coherent DIAL measurement of range-resolved water vapor concentration,” Appl. Opt. 23, 2545–2553 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. P. Drobinski, P. H. Flamant, P. Salamitou, “Spectral diversity technique for heterodyne Doppler lidar that uses hard target returns,” Appl. Opt. 39, 376–385 (2000). [CrossRef]
  14. W. B. Grant, “HeNe and cw CO2 laser long-path systems for gas detection,” Appl. Opt. 25, 709–714 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. R. M. Hardesty, R. J. Keeler, M. J. Post, R. A. Richter, “Characteristics of coherent lidar returns from calibration targets and aerosols,” Appl. Opt. 20, 3763–3769 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. M. Harris, G. N. Pearson, C. A. Hill, J. M. Vaughan, “Higher moments of scattered light fields by heterodyne analysis,” Appl. Opt. 33, 7226–7230 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. M. J. T. Milton, P. T. Woods, “Pulse averaging methods for a laser remote monitoring system using atmospheric backscatter,” Appl. Opt. 26, 2598–2603 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. L. G. Shirley, E. D. Ariel, G. R. Hallerman, H. C. Payson, J. R. Vivilecchia, “Advanced techniques for target discrimination using laser speckle,” Lincoln Lab. J. 5, 367–440 (1992).
  19. J. C. Marron, “Wavelength decorrelation of laser speckle from three-dimensional diffuse objects,” Opt. Commun. 88, 305–308 (1992). [CrossRef]
  20. S. O. Rice, “Statistical properties of a sine wave plus random noise,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 109–157 (1948). [CrossRef]
  21. A. Erdeyli, ed., Tables of Integral Transforms (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954), Vol. 1.
  22. H. Cramer, Mathematical Methods of Statistics (Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., 1946), Sect. 18.3.
  23. K. D. Ridley, E. Jakeman, “Incomplete phase conjugation through a random phase screen. II. Numerical simulations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 2393–2402 (1996). [CrossRef]
  24. M. Harris, “Intensity correlations in filtered phase-diffusing laser light,” Opt. Lett. 23, 519–521 (1998). [CrossRef]
  25. M. Harris, G. Constant, C. Ward, “Continuous-wave bistatic laser Doppler wind sensor,” Appl. Opt. 40, 1501–1506 (2001). [CrossRef]
  26. R. L. Fante, “Electromagnetic beam propagation in turbulent media,” Proc. IEEE 63, 1669–1692 (1975). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited