OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics


  • Vol. 40, Iss. 16 — Jun. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2736–2746

Optimization and theoretical modeling of polymer microlens arrays fabricated with the hydrophobic effect

Daniel M. Hartmann, Osman Kibar, and Sadik C. Esener  »View Author Affiliations

Applied Optics, Vol. 40, Issue 16, pp. 2736-2746 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (381 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



High-performance polymer microlens arrays were fabricated by means of withdrawing substrates of patterned wettability from a monomer solution. The f-number (f#) of formed microlenses was controlled by adjustment of monomer viscosity and surface tension, substrate dipping angle and withdrawal speed, the array fill factor, and the number of dip coats used. An optimum withdrawal speed was identified at which f# was minimized and array uniformity was maximized. At this optimum, arrays of f/3.48 microlenses were fabricated with one dip coat with uniformity of better than Δf/ f ∼ ±3.8%. Multiple dip coats allowed for production of f/1.38 lens arrays and uniformity of better than Δf/ f ∼ ±5.9%. Average f#s were reproducible to within 3.5%. A model was developed to describe the fluid-transfer process by which monomer solution assembles on the hydrophilic domains. The model agrees well with experimental trends.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(160.5470) Materials : Polymers
(220.3620) Optical design and fabrication : Lens system design
(220.4000) Optical design and fabrication : Microstructure fabrication

Original Manuscript: April 3, 2000
Revised Manuscript: January 31, 2001
Published: June 1, 2001

Daniel M. Hartmann, Osman Kibar, and Sadik C. Esener, "Optimization and theoretical modeling of polymer microlens arrays fabricated with the hydrophobic effect," Appl. Opt. 40, 2736-2746 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. R. Taghizadeh, “Micro-optical fabrication technologies for optical interconnection applications,” in Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics, Postconference Digest, Vol. 41 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2000), p. 260.
  2. M. W. Haney, “Micro- versus macro-optics in free-space optical interconnects” in Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics, Postconference Digest, Vol. 41 of OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2000), pp. 266–268.
  3. S. Eitel, S. J. Fancey, H. P. Gauggel, K. H. Gulden, W. Bachtold, M. R. Taghizadeh, “Highly uniform vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers integrated with microlens arrays,” IEEE Photo. Technol. Lett. 12, 459–461 (2000). [CrossRef]
  4. G. Sharp, L. E. Schmutz, “Microlens arrays meet any challenge,” Lasers Optron. Lasers Optron. 16, 21–23 (1997).
  5. M. C. Wu, L. Y. Lin, S. S. Lee, C. R. King, “Free-space integrated optics realized by surface-micromachining,” Int. J. High Speed Electron. Syst. 8, 283–297 (1997). [CrossRef]
  6. M. F. Chang, M. C. Wu, J. J. Yao, M. E. Motamedi, “Surface micromachined devices for microwave and photonic applications,” in Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, M. Osinski, Y. Su, eds., Proc. SPIE3419, 214–226 (1998).
  7. S. Traut, H. P. Herzig, “Holographically recorded gratings on microlenses for a miniaturized spectrometer array,” Opt. Eng. 39, 290–298 (2000). [CrossRef]
  8. M. Eisner, N. Lindlein, J. Schwider, “Confocal microscopy with a refractive microlens-pinhole array,” Opt. Lett. 23, 748–749 (1998). [CrossRef]
  9. P. Nussbaum, R. Volkel, H. P. Herzig, M. Eisner, S. Haselbeck, “Design, fabrication and testing of microlens arrays for sensors and microsystems,” Pure Appl. Opt. 6, 617–636 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. M. E. Motamedi, W. E. Tennant, H. O. Sankur, R. Melendes, N. S. Gluck, S. Park, J. M. Arias, J. Bajaj, J. G. Pasko, W. V. McLevige, M. Zandian, R. L. Hall, P. D. Richardson, “Micro-optic integration with focal plane arrays,” Opt. Eng. 36, 1374–1381 (1997). [CrossRef]
  11. E. Kim, G. M. Whitesides, “Use of minimal free energy and self-assembly to form shapes,” Chem. Mater. 7, 1257–1264 (1995). [CrossRef]
  12. J. L. Wilbur, A. Kurmar, H. Biebuyck, E. Kim, G. M. Whitesides, “Microcontact printing of self-assembled monolayers: applications in microfabrication,” Nanotechnology 7, 452–457 (1996). [CrossRef]
  13. H. Biebuyck, G. M. Whitesides, “Self-organization of organic liquids on patterned self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold,” Langmuir 10, 2790–2793 (1994). [CrossRef]
  14. D. M. Hartmann, O. Kibar, S. C. Esener, “Characterization of a polymer microlens fabricated by use the hydrophobic effect,” Opt. Lett. 25, 975–977 (2000). [CrossRef]
  15. In using the resist reflow process there is a great deal of variability in the sag-height uniformity that can be achieved. Factors that affect the achievable uniformity include the lens pitch, sag height, fill factor, and lens size. Typical sag-height variations range from 44h/h ∼ ±2–10; John Rauseo, MEMS Optical Incorporated, 205 Import Circle, Huntsville Alabama 35806 (personal communication, 2000).
  16. L. Schwartz, “Hysteretic effects in droplet motions on heterogeneous substrates: direct numerical simulation,” Langmuir 14, 3440–3453 (1998). [CrossRef]
  17. L. Schwartz, R. Eley, “Simulation of droplet motion on low-energy and heterogeneous surfaces,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 202, 173–188 (1998). [CrossRef]
  18. M. Schrader, G. Loeb, eds., Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications (Plenum, New York, 1992). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Landau, B. Levich, “Dragging of a liquid by a moving plate,” Acta Physicochim. URSS 17, 43–54 (1942).
  20. L. M. Hocking, “Sliding and spreading of thin two-dimensional drops,” Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 34, 37–55 (1981). [CrossRef]
  21. P. Thompson, S. Troian, “A general boundary condition for liquid flow at solid surfaces,” Nature (London) 389, 360–362 (1997). [CrossRef]
  22. B. Jean-Louis, “Large slip effect at a nonwetting fluid–solid interface,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4671–4674 (1999). [CrossRef]
  23. B. Widom, “Line tension and the shape of a sessile drop,” J. Phys. Chem. 99, 2803–2806 (1995). [CrossRef]
  24. J. Pellicer, J. Manzanares, S. Mafe, “The physical description of elementary surface phenomena: thermodynamics versus mechanics,” Am. J. Phys. 63, 542–547 (1995). [CrossRef]
  25. F. Behroozi, H. Macomber, J. Dostal, C. Behroozi, B. Lambert, “The profile of a dew drop,” Am. J. Phys. 64, 1120–1125 (1996). [CrossRef]
  26. A. Eberle, A. Reich, “Angle-dependent dip-coating technique (ADDC) an improved method for the production of optical filters. 1. Process flow for hydrophobic patterning of microlenses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 218, 156–162 (1997). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited