OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 41, Iss. 12 — Apr. 20, 2002
  • pp: 2232–2239

Effectiveness of simultaneous independent realizations at low carrier-to-noise ratio to improve heterodyne Doppler lidar performance. I. Theory and numerical simulations

Gaspard Guérit, Philippe Drobinski, Pierre H. Flamant, and Jean-Pierre Cariou  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 41, Issue 12, pp. 2232-2239 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.002232


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (190 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

It is shown that the performance of heterodyne Doppler lidar (HDL) can be improved by (i) at least one good realization for every single shot or (ii) several simultaneous good realizations for accumulation. Until now, several simultaneous independent realizations at high carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) have been considered. At low CNR, noise may have a detrimental effect on the accumulation techniques. We determine the chances of getting “heavy” speckles in HDL signals from many receiver-detector units on a single-shot basis and several good realizations on a single-shot basis, which is required for an effective accumulation. The use of multiple receiver-detector units at low CNR is worthwhile in contexts such as space lidar, where optimized treatment is at a premium. We conclude on the effectiveness of many receiver-detector units in parallel in order to achieve simultaneous independent realizations at low CNR to improve the performance of HDL on a statistical basis.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.3640) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Lidar
(030.1640) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherence
(040.2840) Detectors : Heterodyne
(040.3780) Detectors : Low light level

History
Original Manuscript: June 14, 2001
Revised Manuscript: December 5, 2001
Published: April 20, 2002

Citation
Gaspard Guérit, Philippe Drobinski, Pierre H. Flamant, and Jean-Pierre Cariou, "Effectiveness of simultaneous independent realizations at low carrier-to-noise ratio to improve heterodyne Doppler lidar performance. I. Theory and numerical simulations," Appl. Opt. 41, 2232-2239 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-41-12-2232


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. M. Hardesty, “Measurement of range-resolved water-vapor concentration by coherent CO2 differential absorption,” NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL WPL- 118 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colo., 1984), pp. 45–47.
  2. W. A. Brewer, V. Wulfmeyer, R. M. Hardesty, B. J. Rye, “Combined wind and water-vapor measurements using the NOAA mini-MOPA Doppler lidar”, in Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Laser Radar Conference, 6–10 July 1998, Annapolis, Md., U. N. Singh, S. Ismail, G. K. Schwemmer, eds. (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington D.C., 1998), pp. 565–568.
  3. P. Drobinski, R. A. Brown, P. H. Flamant, J. Pelon, “Evidence of organised large eddies by ground-based Doppler lidar, sonic anemometer and sodar,” Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 88, 343–361 (1998). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Drobinski, A. M. Dabas, C. Haeberli, P. H. Flamant, “On the small-scale dynamics of flow splitting in the Rhine valley during a shallow foehn event,” Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 99, 277–296 (2001). [CrossRef]
  5. D. Fink, S. N. Vodopia, “Coherent detection SNR of an array of detectors,” Appl. Opt. 15, 453–454 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. P. Chan, D. K. Killinger, “Coherent summation of spatially distorted laser Doppler signals by using a two dimensional heterodyne detector array,” Opt. Lett. 17, 1237–1239 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. X. Favreau, A. Delaval, P. H. Flamant, A. Dabas, P. Delville, “Four-element receiver for pulsed 10-µm heterodyne Doppler lidar,” Appl. Opt. 39, 2441–2448 (2000). [CrossRef]
  8. P. Gatt, T. P. Costello, D. A. Heimermann, D. C. Castellanos, A. R. Weeks, M. Stickley, “Coherent optical array receivers for the mitigation of atmospheric turbulence and speckle effects,” Appl. Opt. 35, 5999–6009 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. P. Drobinski, P. H. Flamant, P. Salamitou, “Spectral diversity technique for heterodyne Doppler lidar that uses hard target returns,” Appl. Opt. 39, 376–385 (2000). [CrossRef]
  10. A. M. Dabas, P. H. Flamant, P. Salamitou, “Characterization of pulsed coherent Doppler lidar with the speckle effect,” Appl. Opt. 33, 6524–6532 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. P. Drobinski, A. M. Dabas, P. Delville, P. H. Flamant, J. Pelon, R. M. Hardesty, “Refractive index structure parameter in the planetary boundary layer: a comparison of measurements taken by a 10.6-µm coherent lidar, a 0.9-µm scintillometer and in-situ sensors,” Appl. Opt. 38, 1648–1656 (1999). [CrossRef]
  12. G. Guérit, P. Drobinski, P. H. Flamant, B. Augère, “Analytical expressions of the transverse coherence properties for monostatic and bistatic lidar in presence of moderate atmospheric refractive index turbulence,” Appl. Opt. 40, 4275–4285 (2001). [CrossRef]
  13. B. J. Rye, R. M. Hardesty, “Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar. I. spectral accumulation and the Cramer-Rao lower bound,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 31, 16–27 (1993). [CrossRef]
  14. B. J. Rye, R. M. Hardesty, “Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar. II. correlogram accumulation,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 31, 28–35 (1993). [CrossRef]
  15. R. G. Frehlich, S. M. Hannon, S. W. Henderson, “Coherent Doppler lidar measurements of winds in the weak signal regime,” Appl. Opt. 36, 3491–3499 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. M. Dabas, “Semiempirical model for the reliability of a matched filter frequency estimator for Doppler lidar,” J. Atmos. Ocean Techol. 16, 19–28 (1999). [CrossRef]
  17. B. J. Rye, R. M. Hardesty, “Detection techniques for validating Doppler estimates in heterodyne lidar,” Appl. Opt. 36, 1940–1951 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. W. Goodman, “Statistical properties of laser speckles patterns,” in Laser Speckles and Related Phenomena, J. C. Dainty, ed., Vol. 9 of Springer Topics in Applied Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984), pp. 51–58.
  19. J. H. Churnside, H. T. Yura, “Speckle statistics of atmospherically backscattered laser light,” Appl. Opt. 22, 2559–2565 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. D. S. Zrnic, “Simulation of weatherlike Doppler spectra and signals,” J. Appl. Meteor. 14, 619–620 (1975). [CrossRef]
  21. R. G. Frehlich, M. J. Yadlowsky, “Performance of mean-frequency estimators for Doppler radar and lidar,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 11, 1217–1230 (1994). [CrossRef]
  22. M. J. Levin, “Power spectrum parameter estimation,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 11, 100–107 (1968). [CrossRef]
  23. A. M. Dabas, P. Drobinski, P. H. Flamant, “Adaptative filters for frequency estimates of heterodyne Doppler lidar returns: recursive implementation and quality control,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 16, 361–372 (1999). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited