OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 41, Iss. 13 — May. 1, 2002
  • pp: 2488–2493

Optimization of a dual-rotating-retarder Mueller matrix polarimeter

Matthew H. Smith  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 41, Issue 13, pp. 2488-2493 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.002488


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (660 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The dual-rotating-retarder configuration is one of the most common forms of the Mueller matrix polarimeter. I perform an optimization of this polarimeter configuration by minimizing the condition number of the system data reduction matrix. I find the optimum retardance for the rotating retarders to be 127°. If exactly 16 intensity measurements are used for a Mueller matrix calculation, a complex relationship exists between the condition number and the sizes of the angular increments of the two retarders. If many intensity measurements are made, thus overspecifying the calculation, I find broad optimal ranges of angular increments of the two retarders that yield essentially equal performance. Experimental results are given.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.5410) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Polarimetry
(230.5440) Optical devices : Polarization-selective devices

History
Original Manuscript: August 8, 2001
Revised Manuscript: January 2, 2002
Published: May 1, 2002

Citation
Matthew H. Smith, "Optimization of a dual-rotating-retarder Mueller matrix polarimeter," Appl. Opt. 41, 2488-2493 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-41-13-2488


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. M. A. Azzam, “Photopolarimetric measurement of the Mueller matrix by Fourier analysis of a single detected signal,” Opt. Lett. 2, 148–150 (1977). [CrossRef]
  2. P. S. Hauge, “Mueller matrix ellipsometry with imperfect compensators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 1519–1528 (1978). [CrossRef]
  3. D. H. Goldstein, R. A. Chipman, “Error analysis of a Mueller matrix polarimeter,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 693–700 (1990). [CrossRef]
  4. D. B. Chenault, J. L. Pezzaniti, R. A. Chipman, “Mueller matrix algorithms,” in Polarization Analysis and Measurement, D. Goldstein, R. Chipman, eds., Proc. SPIE1746, 231–246 (1992). [CrossRef]
  5. S. N. Jasperson, S. E. Schatterly, “An improved method for high reflectivity ellipsometry based on a new polarization modulation technique,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 40, 761–767 (1969). [CrossRef]
  6. G. E. Jellison, F. A. Modine, “Two-modulator generalized ellipsometer: experiment and calibration,” Appl. Opt. 36, 8184–8189 (1997). [CrossRef]
  7. R. C. Thompson, J. R. Bottinger, E. S. Fry, “Measurement of polarized light interactions via the Mueller matrix,” Appl. Opt. 19, 1323–1332 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. S. Krishnan, P. C. Nordine, “Mueller-matrix ellipsometry using the division-of-amplitude photopolarimeter: a study of depolarization effects,” Appl. Opt. 33, 4184–4192 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. R. M. A. Azzam, “Mueller-matrix measurement using the four-detector photopolarimeter,” Opt. Lett. 11, 270–272 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. F. Delplancke, “Automated high-speed Mueller matrix scatterometer,” Appl. Opt. 36, 5388–5395 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. R. A. Chipman, “Polarimetry,” in Handbook of Optics, 2nd ed., M. Bass, ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), Vol. 2, Chap. 2.
  12. See, for example, R. D. Skeel, J. B. Keiper, Elementary Numerical Computing with Mathematica (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993), Chap. 4.
  13. D. S. Sabatke, M. R. Descour, E. L. Dereniak, W. C. Sweatt, S. A. Kemme, G. S. Phipps, “Optimization of retardance for a complete Stokes polarimeter,” Opt. Lett. 25, 802–804 (2000). [CrossRef]
  14. J. S. Tyo, “Noise equalization in Stokes parameter images obtained by use of variable-retardance polarimeters,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1198–1200 (2000). [CrossRef]
  15. A. Ambirajan, D. C. Look, “Optimum angles for a Mueller matrix polarimeter,” in Polarization Analysis and Measurement II, D. Goldstein, D. Chenault, eds., Proc. SPIE2265, 314–326 (1994). [CrossRef]
  16. J. E. Drewes, R. A. Chipman, M. H. Smith, “Characterizing polarization controllers with Mueller matrix polarimetry,” in Active and Passive Optical Components for WDM Communication, A. Dutta, A. Awwal, N. K. Dutta, K. Okamoto, eds., Proc. SPIE4532, 462–466 (2001). [CrossRef]
  17. S. Lu, R. A. Chipman, “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. A. 13, 1106–1113 (1996). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited