OSA's Digital Library

Applied Optics

Applied Optics

APPLICATIONS-CENTERED RESEARCH IN OPTICS

  • Vol. 41, Iss. 21 — Jul. 20, 2002
  • pp: 4307–4313

Structured surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function reciprocity: theory and counterexamples

William C. Snyder  »View Author Affiliations


Applied Optics, Vol. 41, Issue 21, pp. 4307-4313 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.004307


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (103 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

I address the question of whether the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of a structured surface has the same value when the incident and reflected angles are reversed. In particular, I examine the validity of some recent counterexamples and contrary measurements. On the basis of a new definition for structured surfaces, I conclude that the BRDF should be reciprocal. I show that designed counterexamples are flawed and suggest that measurements that do not exhibit reciprocity can be attributed to uncertainty and uncontrolled factors.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.5620) Coherence and statistical optics : Radiative transfer
(030.5630) Coherence and statistical optics : Radiometry
(030.5770) Coherence and statistical optics : Roughness
(120.0280) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Remote sensing and sensors
(120.5820) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Scattering measurements

History
Original Manuscript: December 19, 2001
Revised Manuscript: May 9, 2002
Published: July 20, 2002

Citation
William C. Snyder, "Structured surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function reciprocity: theory and counterexamples," Appl. Opt. 41, 4307-4313 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-41-21-4307


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. E. Nicodemus, Radiometry, Vol. 4 of the Applied Optics and Optical Engineering Series (Academic, New York, 1967).
  2. F. E. Nicodemus, J. C. Richmond, J. J. Hsia, I. W. Ginsberg, T. Limperis, “Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance,” Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) Monogr. 160, (1977).
  3. W. G. Rees, Physical Principles of Remote Sensing (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990).
  4. F. J. J. Clarke, D. J. Parry, “Helmholtz reciprocity: its validity and application to reflectometry,” Light Res. Technol. 17, 1–11 (1985). [CrossRef]
  5. R. Siegel, J. R. Howell, Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, 2nd ed. (Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., 1981).
  6. W. C. Snyder, Z. Wan, X. Li, “Thermodynamic constraints on reflectance reciprocity and Kirchhoff’s law,” Appl. Opt. 37, 3464–3470 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. R. Carminati, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, J.-J. Greffet, “Reciprocity of evanescent electromagnetic waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 706–712 (1998). [CrossRef]
  8. J.-J. Greffet, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, “Field theory for generalized bidirectional reflectivity: derivation of Helmholtz’s reciprocity principle and Kirchhoff’s law,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2735–2744 (1998). [CrossRef]
  9. W. C. Snyder, “Reciprocity of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) in measurements and models of structured surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 36, 685–691 (1998). [CrossRef]
  10. W. C. Snyder, “Definition and invariance properties of structured surface BRDF,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. (to be published).
  11. H. Okayama, I. Ogura, “Experimental verification of nonreciprocal response in light scattering from rough surfaces,” Appl. Opt. 23, 3349–3352 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. W. Venable, “Comments on reciprocity failure,” Appl. Opt. 24, 3943 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. H. J. Eom, “Energy conservation and reciprocity of random rough surface scattering,” Appl. Opt. 24, 1730–1732 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. M.-J. Kim, “Verification of the reciprocity theorem,” Appl. Opt. 27, 2645–2646 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. X. Li, Z. Wan, “Comments on reciprocity in the directional reflectance modeling,” Prog. Nat. Sci. 8, 354–358 (1998).
  16. E. Eisner, “Acoustic reciprocity paradox,” Geophysics 48, 1132–1134 (1981). [CrossRef]
  17. X. Li, J. Wang, A. Strahler, “Apparent reciprocity failure in directional reflectance of structured surfaces,” Prog. Nat. Sci. 9, 747–752 (1999).
  18. F. A. Dahlen, R. I. Odom, “Acoustic reciprocity—a paradox,” Geophysics 49, 478–480 (1984). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995). [CrossRef]
  20. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference, and Diffraction of Light (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited